Pengaruh fasilinus, pentadbir sekolah dan guru LINUS terhadap pelaksanaan program LINUS di sekolah rendah daerah Kota Kinabalu

The Influence of LINUS facilitators, School Administrators and LINUS Teachers’ towards the Implementation of the LINUS Programme in Kota Kinabalu District Primary School

Authors

  • Abdul Said Ambotang Fakulti Psikologi dan Pendidikan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Hariana A. Ahong Fakulti Psikologi dan Pendidikan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Connie Shin Fakulti Psikologi dan Pendidikan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol8.no1.2.2019

Keywords:

fasilitator LINUS, pentadbir sekolah, guru LINUS, program LINUS

Abstract

 

Kajian ini dijalankan untuk mengkaji pengaruh pegawai fasilitator LINUS, kepimpinan pentadbir sekolah dan sumbangan guru LINUS terhadap pelaksanaan program LINUS di sekolah rendah daerah Kota Kinabalu. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dalam bentuk kaedah tinjauan yang melibatkan 52 buah sekolah rendah di daerah Kota Kinabalu dan sampel kajian dikira berdasarkan rumus Cochran. Minimum sampel yang diperlukan ialah 264 orang, tetapi kajian ini telah mengambil 350 orang guru sebagai sampel kajian untuk memastikan ketepatan data. Instrumen kajian yang digunakan ialah borang soal selidik yang dihasilkan sendiri oleh pengkaji dan data yang diperoleh dianalisis menggunakan analisis regresi berganda. Dapatan kajian analisis inferensi mendapati terdapat pengaruh yang sangat kuat antara ketiga-tiga pemboleh ubah bebas iaitu peranan fasiLINUS, sokongan pentadbir dan sumbangan guru terhadap pemboleh ubah bersandar iaitu pelaksanaan program LINUS. Pelaksanaan program ini perlu melibatkan banyak pihak secara umumnya dan melibatkan sekolah khasnya. Penguasaan kemahiran asas pada peringkat awal ini dapat membantu murid menguasai kemahiran pada tahap yang lebih tinggi.  

   

This study was conducted to examine the influence of LINUS facilitator officers, school administrator’s leadership and LINUS teachers' contribution to the implementation of the LINUS programme in Kota Kinabalu district primary schools. The study used a quantitative approach in form of surveys design involving 52 primary schools in the Kota Kinabalu district and the study sample was calculated based on the Cochran formula. The minimum sample size required was 264 but this study took 350 teachers as the sample to ensure data accuracy. The research instrument used was a self-administered questionnaire and the data were analysed using multiple regression analysis. The findings of the inference analysis found that there was a strong influence among the three independent variables, namely the role of LINUS, administrative support and teacher contribution to the dependent variable that is the implementation of the LINUS program. The implementation of this program involves many parties in general and involves schools in particular. The mastery of basic skills at this early stage can help students master the skills at a higher level.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, J., & Boon, Y. (2011). Amalan kepimpinan sekolah berprestasi tinggi (SBT) di Malaysia. Journal of Edupres, 1, 323-335.

Baroody, A. E., & Diamond, K. E. (2012). Links among home literacy environment , literacy interest , and emergent literacy skills in preschoolers at risk for reading difficulties. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 32(2), 78–87. doi: 10.1177/0271121410392803

Bartlett, K. R. (2001). The relationship between training and organizational commitment: A study in the health care field. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4), 335-361.

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Full range leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.

Bordia. A., & Carron, G. (1985). Issues in planning and implementing national literacy programmes. UNESCO, Paris.

Chin, R., & Yusoff, N. (2017). Penggunaan strategi pembelajaran bahasa untuk menguasai kemahiran membaca. Proceedings of IcsoTL, 35-47. doi: 10.1145/1321631.1321682

Choy, L. T. (2014). The strengths and weaknesses of research methodology: Comparison and complimentary between qualitative and quantitative approaches. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(4), 99–104. doi: 10.9790/0837-194399104

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons
.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Hakim, A., Oemar, Y., & Marnis. (2016). Pengaruh kepuasan kerja, komitmen kerja dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja fasilitator Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) Mandiri Pedesaan di Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir. Jurnal Tepak Manajemen Bisnis, VIII(1), 20.

Handayani, S. (2014). Peningkatan kompetensi pedagogi guru IPS Sekolah Dasar melalui penerapan keterampilan mengajar. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 2(1), 1-15.

Hashim, S., & Daud, K. (2014). Amalan kepimpinan lestari dan hubungannya dengan prestasi kerja guru sekolah rendah yang menerima tawaran baru di daerah Segamat. Sains Humanika, 4(2), 197–208. doi: 10.11113/SH.V2N1.389

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on teaching. Diperoleh daripada www.TheMainIdea.net

Hook, C. M., & Rosenshine, B. V. (1979). Accuracy of teacher reports of their classroom behavior. Review of Educational Research, 49(1), 1-11. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Israel, G. D. (1992). Determinig sample size. University of Florida, (November), 1–5.

Kumar, M., Talib, S. A., & Ramayah, T. (2013). Business research methods. Oxford Fajar/Oxford University Press.

Kyriacou, C. (1980). Sources of stress among British teachers: The contribution of job factors and personality factors. White collar and professional stress, 113-128.

Mustari. (2016). Menubuhkan pendidikan karakter di sekolah melalui pola pembiasaan. Seminar Nasional “Pendidikan ilmu-ilmu sosial membentuk karakter bangsa dalam rangka daya saing global,”, 61–68.

Nazariyah Sani. (2014). Pelaksanaan program LINUS: Satu analisis. Universiti Malaysia.

Richmond, M., Robinson, C., & Sachs-Israel, M. (2008). The global literacy challenge. Diperoleh semula daripada http://www.unesco.org/education/GAW2009/TheGlobalLiteracyChallenge.pdf%5Cnhttp://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/education-building-blocks/literacy/the-global-literacy-challenge-at-the-un/

Rubin, A., & Bobbie, E. (2010). Research methods for social work.

UNESCO. (1997). Adult education: The hamburg declaration - the agenda for the future. Confintea, (July), 1–17.

White, P., & Cranitch, M. (2010). The impact on final year pre-service secondary teachers of a unit in teaching literacy and numeracy across the curriculum. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(7).

Zainiah Mohamed Isa, Juppri Bacotang, & Mazlina Che Mustafa. (2018). Pencapaian kemahiran literasi awal kanak-kanak berusia 2, 3 dan 4 tahun. Jurnal Penyelidikan Teknokrat II, 20(1), 40-50.

Zinitulniza Abdul Kadir. (2011). Sudut pandang Muhyiddin Yassin. Institut Terjemahan Negara Malaysia.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-07

How to Cite

Ambotang, A. S., A. Ahong, H., & Shin, C. (2019). Pengaruh fasilinus, pentadbir sekolah dan guru LINUS terhadap pelaksanaan program LINUS di sekolah rendah daerah Kota Kinabalu: The Influence of LINUS facilitators, School Administrators and LINUS Teachers’ towards the Implementation of the LINUS Programme in Kota Kinabalu District Primary School. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 8(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol8.no1.2.2019