Reforming Social Protection for Gig Workers in Malaysia: An Institutional Approach

Authors

  • Nur Hazwani Zolkifly Department of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Perak branch, 32610, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • Shahrel Nizar Baharom Faculty of Art and Design, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Perak branch, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.Vol19.1.2.2026

Keywords:

Social Protection, Gig Workers, Institutional Approach, Good Health and Well-being, Decent Work and Economic Growth

Abstract

The gig economy has transformed employment landscapes by offering flexible work opportunities but has also exposed workers to vulnerabilities due to limited access to social protections, such as health insurance and retirement benefits. This conceptual research adopts Scott’s Three Pillars of Institutions (regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive) to comprehensively analyze the gaps in Malaysia's social protection system for gig workers and provides actionable recommendations. By reviewing academic publications, policy documents, and international best practices, the study identifies key challenges, including fragmented regulations, inconsistent industry norms, and negative cultural perceptions towards social protection. The research employs a literature-based methodology by drawing comparative insights from international practices like Singapore and the EU and demonstrate adaptable policy models for Malaysia’s socio-economic context. The paper offers broad recommendations, including gradual mandatory contributions and standardizing voluntary schemes. These findings aim to contribute to ongoing policy discussions and encourage collaborative efforts among policymakers, industry players, and civil society to develop an inclusive and resilient social protection framework for gig workers. Additionally, the study contributes to the field of business education by linking institutional theory with real-world labor market challenges, thereby enriching management and entrepreneurship curriculum with insights into inclusive workforce practices. While this study provides a theoretical and policy-based analysis, the primary limitation is the lack of empirical validation through primary data collection. Future research should incorporate qualitative insights from gig workers and industry stakeholders to assess the practical implementation of proposed policy recommendations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ab Wahid, H., Hishamuddin, A. Z., & Abd Rahman, R. (2023). Social entrepreneurship approach towards leveraging Persons with Disabilities (PwD) in Malaysia. International Business Education Journal, 16(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.vol16.1.7.2023

Abdur Rahman, A., Jasmin, A. F., & Ghorpade, Y. (2024). Who are the informally employed in Malaysia? (February), World Bank.

Abd Razak, S. S. (2024). Protecting Gig Workers in the Digital Labour Platform Through the Principles of Social Justice in Islam. Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law and Practice, 20(3), 420–424.

Abd Samad, K., Abd Rahman, N. H., Ismail, S., & Marmaya, N. H. (2023). Is the well-being of gig workers in Malaysia better? The reality of pain and gain. International Review of Applied Economics, 37(4), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2023.2240243

Achour, Z. (2025). Social sustainability in the gig economy: Rethinking social protection systems for platform workers. In Sustainability and Adaptability of Gig Economies in Global Business (pp. 297–322). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9385-7.ch011

Alturkey, Y. A. (2024). The gig economy: Insights into worker experiences in the UK and Saudi Arabia. Open Journal of Business and Management, 12(03), 1766–1799. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2024.123094

Au-Yeung, T. C., Chan, C. K.-C., Ming, C. K. K., & Tsui, W. Y. A. (2025). The gig economy, platform work, and social policy: food delivery workers’ occupational welfare dilemma in Hong Kong. Journal of Social Policy, 54(2), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279423000673

Bae, J. (2024). The gig economy and social insurance systems: public opinion, policy analysis, and policy design (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri--Columbia).

Barrientos, A. (2024). Social Protection in Latin America: Causality, Stratification and Outcomes (A. Barrientos (ed.)). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49795-7_3

Barrio, A. (2024). Unemployment insurance for platform workers: Challenges and approaches from a comparative perspective. European Journal of Social Security, 26(2), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627241267989

Behrendt, C., Nguyen, Q. A., & Rani, U. (2019). Social protection systems and the future of work: Ensuring social security for digital platform workers. International Social Security Review, 72(3), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12212

Bender, K., Rohregger, B., Kinuthia, B., Ikua, G., Schüring, E., Adamba, C., Alatinga, K. A., & Pouw, N. (2021). Different pathways of social protection reforms: An analysis of long-term institutional change in Kenya. World Development, 137, 105210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105210

Bernama. (2023, October 13). Belanjawan 2024 : Had Caruman I - Suri , I - Saraan KWSP Dinaikkan. Bernama. https://www.bernama.com/bm/news.php?id=2234656

Bisht, N., & Pattanaik, F. (2021). How inclusive is “Inclusive Development” in India? Challenges and prospects of Indian youth labor market. International Business Education Journal, 14(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.vol14.1.2.2021

Bonvin, J.-M., Cianferoni, N., & Mexi, M. (2023). Chapter 1: Introduction. In Social Dialogue in the Gig Economy: A Comparative Empirical Analysis (pp. 1–17). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800372375.00006

Chueri, J., & Busemeyer, M. R. (2025). Different status, same demands? The social policy preferences of platform workers in OECD countries. Competition & Change, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251318440

Daud, S. N. M., Osman, Z., Samsudin, S., & Phang, G. (2024). Adapting to the gig economy: Determinants of financial resilience among “Giggers”. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 756-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2024.01.002

Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2024). Labour Force Statistics Report (Issue January). https://storage.dosm.gov.my/labour/lfs_month_2024-01_en.pdf

Devereux, S. & Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2004). Transformative social protection for Africa's children. Social protection for Africa's children in Africa. 216-239.

Divya, S., & Barani, G. (2024). An evaluation of social protection measures for gig workers - A pilot study. In Organization, Purpose and Values: Integrating Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (pp. 143–165). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003501374-10

Fadhlulloh, Q. H., & Azhari, A. F. (2023). Perbandingan kedudukan hukum pekerja gig economy di Indonesia, Belanda, dan Inggris. Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 12(2), 307–322.https://doi.org/10.34304/jf.v12i2.165

Fuad, D. A. A. (2024, December 29). Gig Economy Expands In 2024 Amid Push For Worker Protections. Bernama. https://www.bernama.com/en/region/news.php?id=2377645

Ghorpade, Y., Rahman, A. A., & Jasmin, A. (2024). Social insurance for gig workers: Insights from a discrete choice experiment in Malaysia. International Social Security Review, 77(3), 3–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12365

Graham, M., & Shaw, J. (2017). Towards a Fairer Gig Economy (M. Graham & J. Shaw (eds.)). Meatspace Press.

Joshi, A., Jain, S., & Gupta, P. K. (2024). Challenges and impact of the gig economy. Sustainable Economies, 2(2), 96. https://doi.org/10.62617/se.v2i2.96

Law, K., Sy, L., Tiah, B., & Wei, J. (2022). The perception of mental health issues that affect workplace productivity in Klang Valley, Malaysia. International Business Education Journal, 15(1), 30–43.https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.vol15.1.3.2022

Leong, T. P., & Ghazali, M. S. (2022, October 15). Perkasa pekerja ekonomi gig dengan kemahiran tinggi. Berita Harian Online. https://www.bharian.com.my/rencana/lain-lain/2022/10/1012559/perkasa-pekerja-ekonomi-gig-dengan-kemahiran-tinggi#google_vignette

Li, W., & Gregory, K. (2019). Vulnerable Workers: Gig Economy, Platform Labour and “Smart Data” (Comments on the Smart Data Review). Social Science Research Network.

Lin, M. Y. M. (2016). Switching Focus Between the Three Pillars of Institutional Theory During Social Movements. In T. S. Chan & G. Cui (Eds.), Asian Businesses in a Turbulent Environment: Uncertainty and Coping Strategies (pp. 21–39). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48887-9_2

Makhtar, M., Abd Ghadas, Z. A., & Yaman, K. M. (2024). Regulatory framework on platform workers’ right to safe and healthy working conditions in Malaysia: A business and human rights approach. Journal of work health and safety regulation, 3(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.57523/jaohlev.oa.24-006

Matsaganis, M. (2022). False starts, wrong turns, and dead ends. How (not) to ensure social protection for all workers. Defining and Protecting Autonomous Work: A Multidisciplinary Approach, 31-50.Medina, A. F. (2025). Singapore ’ s Platform Workers Bill : Transforming the Gig Economy in 2025. Asean Briefing. https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/singapores-platform-workers-bill-transforming-the-gig-economy-in-2025/

Medina, A. F. (2025). Singapore ’ s Platform Workers Bill : Transforming the Gig Economy in 2025. Asean Briefing. https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/singapores-platform-workers-bill-transforming-the-gig-economy-in-2025/

Ministry of Manpower of Singapore. (2024). Commencement of Parts of Platform Workers Bill. https://www.mom.gov.sg/newsroom/press-releases/2024/1022-commencement-of-parts-of-platform-workers-bill

Mugambwa, J., Andabati, D., & Muyomba, B. (2024). Experiences and perceptions on gig work in Uganda. In Humanism in Business Series: Vol. Part F4244 (pp. 255–279). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59944-6_12

Nagina, R. (2025). Building inclusive and equitable gig economies for sustainable global growth. In Sustainability and Adaptability of Gig Economies in Global Business (pp. 261–296). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9385-7.ch010

Nur, M., Asmorojati, A. W., Megawati, Zuliyah, S., & Isdiyanto, I. Y. (2023). A comparative assessment of digital platform worker protection in the EU and ASEAN. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(2), 367–390. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i2.29823

Öçal, M., & Kutlu, Ö. (2025). Informal work and the protection of social rights: The gray areas of employment. In Informal Work and the Protection of Social Rights: The Gray Areas of Employment. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9198-3

Radzi, M. S. N. M., Bidin, A., Musa, M. K., & Hamid, N. ‘Ashikin. (2022). Protecting gig workers’ interests in Malaysia through registered association under Societies Act 1966. IIUM Law Journal, 30(S1), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v30is1.702

Ragayah, H.M. (2012). Malaysia: Towards a social protection system in an advanced equitable society. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 29, 197 - 217.

Razak, S. S. A., & Shukor, S. F. A. (2025). reforming social security protection for platform workers in Malaysia’s digital labour platforms. IIUM Law Journal, 33(1), 35–64. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v33i1.1017

Salam, A. (2020). Organizational justice as a predictor of organizational citizenship behaviour. International Business Education Journal, 13, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.vol13.sp.3.2020

Sankararaman, G., Natarajan, R., V., R., N.R., V., & D., I. (2024). Gig economy’s impact on workforce dynamics and economic resilience. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(6), 1627–1634. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i6.5561

Schoukens, P., Fernandez, A. B., & Montebovi, S. (2018). Social protection of non-standard workers : The case of platform work. 1, 227–258. https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/social-protection-of-non-standard-workers-the-case-of-platform-wo

Schwartz, L., & Weber, N. (2023). Asymmetric by Design: How and Why Labor Policy Impacts Gig Workers. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/mh29a

Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. In Sage Publications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.22439/cjas.v32i2.4764

Siachiwena, H., & Seekings, J. (2024). The politics of “institutionalising” social protection in Africa: The retrenchment of social cash transfers in Zambia, 2015-2021. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 39(3), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/ics.2023.17

Stewart, A., & Stanford, J. (2022). Chapter 3: Giving platform workers a say: regulating for voice in the gig economy (pp. 48–70). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839105548.00011

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788

Tran, M., & Sokas, R. K. (2017). The gig economy and contingent work: An occupational health assessment. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59(4), e63–e66. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000977

Uchiyama, Y., Furuoka, F., & Akhir, M. N. M. (2022). Gig workers, social protection and labour market inequality: Lessons from Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 56(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.17576/JEM-2022-5603-09

Yaroshenko, O. M., Tkachenko, V. S., Puntus, D. A., Yakovleva, G. O., & Konopeltseva, O. O. (2024). Models of social protection for workers in the gig economy: Legal challenges and prospects. Science of Law, 2024(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.55284/sol.v2024i3.139

Yusoff, N. D., Ismail, S., Razak, N. A., Rafien, N. S. M. and Yaakub, W. (2024), Retirement preparedness among Malaysia’s low-income private sector employees: A conceptual model,” Information Management and Business Review, 16(I), pp. 613–627, https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i3(I)S.4088

Zhang, H., & Liu, K. (2024). Can a voluntarist approach to social security extend protection to gig workers? Evidence from the platform-based food-delivery sector in China. Journal of Industrial Relations, 00221856241262786. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856241262786

Zolkifly, N. H., Fadly Habidin, N., Baharom, S. N., Lailatul, N., & Yusof, H. M. (2024). The ride-hailing entrepreneurship model for the low-income group: An expert perspective. International Business Education Journal, 17(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.Vol17.1.6.2024

Downloads

Published

2026-04-14

How to Cite

Zolkifly, N. H., & Baharom, S. N. (2026). Reforming Social Protection for Gig Workers in Malaysia: An Institutional Approach. International Business Education Journal, 19(1), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.Vol19.1.2.2026