Planning and Governance of Transfer Technology Activities in Polytechnic Institutions

  • Mohd Norhadi Muda Center of Research and Innovation, Department of Polytechnic and Community College Education, Malaysia
  • Utami Hidayah Abdul Aziz Kuala Langat Community College, Banting, Selangor, Malaysia
Keywords: Transfer technology, planning, governance, polytechnic


Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) institutions are urged to promote transfer technology activities, especially to foster the culture of innovation and commercialisation. Technology transfer enables the technology to be retrieved and manipulated for further usage according to the industrial needs.  Although several technology transfer frameworks developed in past research, those frameworks cannot be applied to the TVET institutions because of the different organisational environment. Therefore, this study aims to identify the relationship between organisational factors, particularly the governance and planning with transfer technology activities in polytechnic. This research used a quantitative approach with a questionnaire as the instrument to test two hypotheses. 150 lecturers were selected as samples for the study involving three Polytechnics in Selangor. The hypotheses were tested based on Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) using the SmartPLS software.  The study found a significant positive relationship between planning and governance with transfer technology practices. TVET institutions could benefit from the results in implementing consistent transfer technology activities by giving more priority to planning and governance.



Download data is not yet available.


Abdul Rahman Hamdan, Mohamad Syazli Fathi & Zainai Mohamed. (2018). Evolution of Malaysia’s technology transfer model facilitated by national policies. International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7(2), 96-202.

Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Gil-Doménech, D. and de la Torre, E.M. (2020). Examining strategies behind universities’ technology transfer portfolio: How different patterns of resource consumption can lead to similar technology transfer profiles. Competitiveness Review, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Wade, M. R. & Schneberger, S. L. (2012). Integrated series in information systems. Explaining and predicting Our Digital Society, (12), 131-142.

Elbanna, S., Andrews, R. & Pollanen, R. (2016). Strategic planning and implementation success in public service organisations: Evidence from Canada. Public Management Review, 18(7), 1017-1042.

Fai, F. M., de Beer, C., & Schutte, C. S. (2018). Towards a novel technology transfer office typology and recommendations for developing countries. Industry and Higher Education, 32(4), 213-225.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 39–50.

Good, M., Knockaert, M., Soppe, B., & Wright, M. (2019). The technology transfer ecosystem in academia: An organisational design perspective. Technovation, 82, 35-50.

Guerrero, M. & Urbano, D. (2019). Effectiveness of technology transfer policies and legislation in fostering entrepreneurial innovations across continents: an overview, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 1347–1366.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS- SEM). London: Sage Publication.

Irdayanti Mat Nashir, Ramlee Mustapha, Nurul Nazirah Mohd Iman Ma’arof & Rui, T. J. (2020). Modified delphi technique: The development of measurement model for innovative instructional leadership in technical and vocational education systems. Journal of Technical Education and Training, (12)1, 24-37.

Katz, E. & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. New York: Free Press.

Kaushik, A.S. (2014). Technology transfer: enablers and barriers: A review. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 14(2), 133–159

Kilbrink, N. & Bjurulf, V. (2013). Transfer of knowledge in technical vocational education: A narrative study in Swedish upper secondary school. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 519-535.

Kirby, D. A., & El Hadidi, H. H. (2019). University technology transfer efficiency in a factor driven economy: the need for a coherent policy in Egypt. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(5), 1367-1395.

Mazurkiewicz, A. & Poteralska, B. (2016). Technology transfer barriers and challenges faced by R & D organisations. 7th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management Procedia Engineering, Poland, 182, 457-465.

Mendoza, X. P. L., & Sanchez, D. S. M. (2018). A systematic literature review on technology transfer from university to industry. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 12(2), 197-225.

Ndzoyiya, L. C. (2019). Analysis and evaluation of strategic planning and implementation at TVET colleges. A case study of Lovedale College. Master Thesis. Durban University of Technology.

Njiraine, D. (2019). Enabling knowledge sharing practices for academic and research in higher education institutions. Information and Knowledge Management, 9(3), 82-89.

Ramayah, T. & Rahbar, E. (2013). Greening the environment through recycling: An empirical study management of environmental quality. An International Journal, 24(6), 782–801.

Schoen, A., Potterie, B. P. & Henkel, J. (2018). Governance typology of universities’ technology transfer processes. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 1-16.

Tornatzky, L. & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Tsou, H-T. & Hsu, S. H. Y. (2013). Assessing the importance of TOE openness for firm performance: Does co-production matter? In The 2013 International DSI and Asia Pacific DSI Conference. Bali, Indonesia.

Wei, F. J. & Hazri Jamil. (2019). TVET educational choice of Malaysian polytechnic students. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 44(1), 65-76.

Zhang, N. & Meng, Q. (2009). Innovation 2.0 as a paradigm shift : Comparative analysis of three innovation modes. In International Conference on IEEE Management and Service Science, 2009 Chicago, 1–5.

Zuraidah Abdullah, Kazi Enamul Hoque, Nor Hayati Ramlan & Salwati Shafee (2019). Designing the structural model of TVET lecturers’ professionalism and generic skills based on an empirical study in Malaysia. Sage Open, 9(3),1-18.

How to Cite
Muda, M. N., & Abdul Aziz, U. H. (2020). Planning and Governance of Transfer Technology Activities in Polytechnic Institutions. International Business Education Journal, 13, 64-73.