Brands for A Cause: The Effect of Cause-Related Marketing on The Brand Preference of Gen Z to Clothing Brands in Metro Manila

Authors

  • Kyla Marie Feliciano College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Santo Tomas, Manila 1015, Philippines
  • Madeline Iryle David College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Santo Tomas, Manila 1015, Philippines
  • Elyssa Gutierrez College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Santo Tomas, Manila 1015, Philippines
  • Leona Anne Miguel College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Santo Tomas, Manila 1015, Philippines
  • Agnes Jocelyn Bandojo College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Santo Tomas, Manila 1015, Philippines
  • Antonio Etrata, Jr. College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Santo Tomas, Manila 1015, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.Vol18.1.4.2025

Keywords:

cause-related marketing, Brand Preference, Gen Z, Clothing Brands

Abstract

This research looks into the effect of cause-related marketing (CRM) towards the clothing brands that Generation Z chooses in Metro Manila. One of the specific goals is to find out the effect of donation proximity, type of cause, type of support, and length of support on people's choices of clothing brands. With the help of a quantitative descriptive correlational design and purposive sampling, data were taken from 408 qualified Gen Z respondents in Metro Manila who were between the ages of 18 and 26. The information was gathered using paper and online poll forms through Google Forms that used a 6-point Likert scale. The results were looked at using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The convergent validity, construct reliability, and discriminant validity was also utilized in the study to ensure reliable and valid data. The results show that donation proximity, type of cause, and length of support have significant effects on which clothing brands Generation Z likes. However, type of support did not have a significant effect on brand preferences. Type of Cause, Length of Support, and Type of Support all had small effect sizes (f2 = 0.064, f2 = 0.160, and 0.006, respectively). Donation proximity had a medium effect size (f2 = 0.247). The study's conclusion is that local causes, especially those that are close to where the donation is made, have a big effect on Generation Z's good brand preferences in the local clothing industry. People like brands that support causes that help people, animals, the environment, and health. Long-term and consistent participation in CRM activities has a big effect on brand preferences. Based on the results, clothing brands in Metro Manila should support local causes, stick to well-known problems, and offer consistent, long-term support to effectively engage Generation Z customers.

References

Aliperti, G., Rizzi, F., & Frey, M. (2018). Cause-related marketing for disaster risk reduction in the tourism industry: A comparative analysis of prevention- and recovery-related campaigns. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 37, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.08.003

Anuar, M. M., & Adam, F. (2017). Does cause-proximity matter in cause-related marketing? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(7). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325126231

Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, M., Kadic-Maglajlic, S., Dlacic, J., & Zabkar, V. (2022). “We go together”: Understanding social cause-related purchase intentions of young adults. Journal of Business Research, 140, 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.072

Bashir, S., Khwaja, M. G., Rashid, Y., Turi, J. A., & Waheed, T. (2020). Green brand benefits and brand outcomes: The mediating role of green brand image. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020953156

BAYO. (2020, November 9). Last November 3, we promised to donate 50% of our online sales to the victims of Typhoon Rolly [Facebook status update]. Facebook. https://m.facebook.com/bayoclothing/posts/10159063733588767

Beckman, M., Noll, F., & Berndt, A. (2015). Cause-related marketing: A qualitative study into Millennials’ perception. DiVA Portal. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:814276/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Bhakar, S., Rajput, S., & Tyagi, [Initials]. (2013). Social cause-related marketing and its impact on customer brand preferences. ProQuest. Retrieved December 20, 2023, from https://www.proquest.com/openview/38fc13e34b849ca82fe3d278416d4d8a

Chang, C., Chu, X., & Tsai, I. (2021). How cause marketing campaign factors affect attitudes and purchase intention: Choosing the right mix of product and cause types with time duration. Journal of Advertising Research, 65(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2019-046

Christofi, M., Vrontis, D., Leonidou, E., & Thrassou, A. (2018). Customer engagement through choice in cause-related marketing: A potential for global competitiveness. International Marketing Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-04-2018-0133

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Colourette Cosmetics. (2020, November 17). TOTAL AMOUNT RAISED FROM COLOURTINTS FOR A CAUSE [Facebook status update]. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/346737755525748/posts/pfbid0sXD9CJHp2GAkS7xVmMac8jS1XRxe7CzzMxW4oKn8prdAmm5tUoPqUbjH8CDZe9jzl

Colourette Cosmetics. (2022, November 18). COLOURETTE Scoops it Forward 🤍 [Facebook status update]. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/346737755525748/posts/pfbid0Bp5VEEghdxdGTwDcW7JgECWEvqHMxgPqrzzqzRGGtStn4qBjpXv4sssrcaGApBCql

Cui, Y., Trent, E., Sullivan, P., & Matiru, G. (2003). Cause‐related marketing: How Generation Y responds. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 31(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550310476012

Department of Trade and Industry. (2022). Metro Manila profile. DTI. https://www.dti.gov.ph/regions/ncr/profile

Duarte, P. A. d. O., & Silva, S. C. (2020). The role of consumer-cause identification and attitude in the intention to purchase cause-related products. International Marketing Review, 37(4), 603–620. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-04-2018-0159

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Fields, T. (2013). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer behavior: Does the cause matter? Texas Tech University Repository. https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/handle/2346/60650

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Goldsmith, R., & Yimin, Z. (2014). The influences of brand-consumer and cause-congruence on consumer responses to cause-related marketing. Journal of Applied Marketing Theory, 5(2), 12–20. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/jamt/vol5/iss2/4

Handa, M., & Gupta, S. (2020). Digital cause-related marketing campaigns: Relationship between brand-cause fit and behavioral intentions. Journal of Indian Business Research, 12(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-09-2019-0285

Hong, K. T., Ng, S. I., Yusof, R. N. R., & Kaliappan, S. R. (2021). What do consumers like to see in a cause-related marketing campaign board? International Journal of Business and Society, 22, 346–364. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3182.2021

Hoyer, W. D., MacInnis, D. J., & Pieters, R. (2018). Problem recognition and information search. In Consumer behavior (7th ed., pp. 185–200). Cengage Learning.

Huang, L., & Fitzpatrick, J. (2018). Lending a hand: Perceptions of green credit cards. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(7), 1329–1346. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-07-2017-0149

Jublee, D. I., Kasilingam, D., & Stephen, G. (2023). Investigating the impact of brand vs cause interaction on cause-related advertisements. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, 103524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103524

Kao, D. T. (2019). The impact of envy on brand preference: Brand storytelling and psychological distance as moderators. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 28(4), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-08-2018-2004

Kock, N. (2017). WarpPLS user manual: Version 6.0. ScriptWarp Systems.

Lafferty, B. A., & Edmondson, D. R. (2013). A note on the role of cause type in cause-related marketing. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1455–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.07.021

Lee, J. Y., & Johnson, K. K. P. (2019). Cause-related marketing strategy types: Assessing their relative effectiveness. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-03-2018-0032

Moharam, O., Elsamadicy, A. M., & Negm, E. M. (2020). Cause-related marketing: A conceptual and theoretical review. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 22(10), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-2210051726

Not Cool. (2014). Home [Facebook page]. Facebook. Retrieved August 31, 2023, from https://www.facebook.com/notcoolthelabel?mibextid=LQQJ4d

Nuvriasari, A., & Ririn Puspita Sari. (2023). An Investigation on the Relationship between Market Orientation, Innovation, Competitive Advantage and Marketing Performance. International Business Education Journal, 16(1), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.Vol16.1.9.2023.

Pandey, P. K., Bajpai, N., & Tiwari, A. V. (2023). Examining the role of cause-related marketing in influencing the purchase intention of Indian customers in the FMCG sector: The role of attitude and cause involvement. British Food Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2023-0638

Pieper, P. (2019). A study of cause related marketing: Key factors for an efficient cause-related marketing strategy. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1434438/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Pinto, R., & Mekoth, N. (2019). Reciprocity norm can be a magic wand for facilitated giving form of cause-related marketing. International Journal of Advance and Innovative Research, 6(1), 48–51. https://www.academia.edu/download/63604940/Roadside_vendor20200612-108908-1nkrnc9.pdf#page=56

Schoor, M. L. van. (2021). Cause-related marketing in South Africa: Effects of donations and rewards on consumers’ perceived motives, perceived fairness, attitudes and purchase intention. Stellenbosch University. https://scholar.sun.ac.za/server/api/core/bitstreams/7c41a293-df18-4815-809c-406775f74697/content

Soniya, K. (2018). A study on cause-related marketing and its impact on customer brand preference. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 5(4), 219–231. https://www.jetir.org/view?paper=JETIR1804045

Uniqlo Philippines. (2022, October 12). Join us in our efforts to reduce ocean garbage! Click here to learn more: s.uniqlo.com/3VIZ6P5. JOIN: THE POWER OF CLOTHING [Status update]. https://m.facebook.com/UNIQLO.PH/posts/5449339205135786

Vafeiadis, M., Harrison, V., Diddi, P., Dardis, F., & Buckley, C. (2021). Strategic nonprofit communication: Effects of cross-sector corporate social responsibility (CSR) alliances on nonprofits and the mediating role of social-objectives achievement and consumer brand identification. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 15, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2021.1945610

Wang, R., & O’Connor, A. (2022). Can corporate–nonprofit partnerships buffer socially irresponsible corporations from stakeholder backlash? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 27(4), 762–779. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-06-2021-0066.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Feliciano, K. M., David, M. I., Gutierrez, E., Miguel, L. A., Bandojo, A. J., & Etrata, Jr., A. (2025). Brands for A Cause: The Effect of Cause-Related Marketing on The Brand Preference of Gen Z to Clothing Brands in Metro Manila. International Business Education Journal, 18(1), 40-59. https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.Vol18.1.4.2025