Trends of Architectural Design Discussion: Design Process, Cognitive and Concept
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/jcit.vol14.2.6.2024Keywords:
Design process, Design cognitive, Design concept, Design StudiesAbstract
The aim of the paper is to review the trends in discussions related to the design process, design cognition, and design concepts. The method employed to identify these trends involved a thematic literature review of top journals in the Scopus database within the field of architecture and design cognition in 2023. After extensive filtering of journals and articles, the paper narrowed down its focus to one journal that met the criteria, namely Design Studies. Articles were limited to those dated from 2018 to 2023, resulting in a review of 34 articles. Three themes were identified in the articles reviewed, namely (i) Data-Informed Design Process; (ii) Sustainable, Inclusivity, and User Reflection; and (iii) Collaborative Ideation.
Downloads
References
Baek, J. S., Kim, S., Pahk, Y., & Manzini, E. (2018). A sociotechnical framework for the design of collaborative services. Design Studies, 55, 54–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.01.001
Bianchin, M., & Heylighen, A. (2018). Just design. Design Studies, 54, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.001
Bresciani, S. (2019). Visual design thinking: A collaborative dimensions framework to profile visualisations. Design Studies, 63, 92–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.04.001
Chandrasegaran, S., Salah, A. A., & Lloyd, P. (2023). Constructing design activity in words: Exploring linguistic methods to analyse the design process. Design Studies, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101182
Comi, A., Jaradat, S., & Whyte, J. (2019). Constructing shared professional vision in design work: The role of visual objects and their material mediation. Design Studies, 64, 90–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.06.003
Daalhuizen, J., & Cash, P. (2021). Method content theory: Towards a new understanding of methods in design. Design Studies, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101018
Dyer, L., Power, J., Steen, A., Wallis, L., & Davison, A. (2021). Uncertainty and disciplinary difference: Mapping attitudes towards uncertainty across discipline boundaries. Design Studies, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101055
Goddard, Y. L., Ammirante, L., & Jin, N. (2023). A thematic review of current literature examining evidence-based practices and inclusion. Education Sciences, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010038
Gonçalves, M., & Cash, P. (2021). The life cycle of creative ideas: Towards a dual-process theory of ideation. Design Studies, 72, 100988. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.100988
Hanrahan, B. V, Yuan, C. W., Rosson, M. B., Beck, J., & Carroll, J. M. (2019). Materializing interactions with paper prototyping: A case study of designing social, collaborative systems with older adults. Design Studies, 64, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.06.002
Kempenaar, A., & Van den Brink, A. (2018). Regional designing: A strategic design approach in landscape architecture. Design Studies, 54, 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.006
Krishnakumar, S., Berdanier, C., Lauff, C., McComb, C., & Menold, J. (2022). The story novice designers tell: How rhetorical structures and prototyping shape communication with external audiences. Design Studies, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101133
Laing, S., & Apperley, M. (2020). The relevance of virtual reality to communication design. Design Studies, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.100965
Lee, J. H., & Ostwald, M. J. (2022). The relationship between divergent thinking and ideation in the conceptual design process. Design Studies, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101089
Lloyd, P. (2019). You make it and you try it out: Seeds of design discipline futures. Design Studies, 65, 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.008
Lloyd, P., & Oak, A. (2018). Cracking open co-creation: Categories, stories, and value tension in a collaborative design process. Design Studies, 57, 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.02.003
Luck, R. (2018a). Inclusive design and making in practice: Bringing bodily experience into closer contact with making. Design Studies, 54, 96–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.11.003
Luck, R. (2018b). Participatory design in architectural practice: Changing practices in future making in uncertain times. Design Studies, 59, 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.003
Lundmark, S. (2018). Design project failures: Outcomes and gains of participation in design. Design Studies, 59, 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.07.002
Milovanovic, J., Hu, M., Shealy, T., & Gero, J. (2021). Characterization of concept generation for engineering design through temporal brain network analysis. Design Studies, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101044
Monache, S. D., Misdariis, N., & Özcan, E. (2022). Semantic models of sound-driven design: Designing with listening in mind. Design Studies, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101134
Nisha, B. (2022). Lost in imagined space: A psychoanalysis of participatory design. Design Studies, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101108
Oygür, I. (2018). The machineries of user knowledge production. Design Studies, 54, 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.002
Palmieri, T., Huybrechts, L., & Devisch, O. (2021). Co-producing, curating and reconfiguring dwelling patterns: A design anthropological approach for sustainable dwelling futures in residential suburbs. Design Studies, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101011
Stals, A., Jancart, S., & Elsen, C. (2021). Parametric modeling tools in small architectural offices: Towards an adapted design process model. Design Studies, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.100978
Tessier, V. (2022). Expansive learning for collaborative design. Design Studies, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101135
Töre Yargın, G., Moroşanu Firth, R., & Crilly, N. (2018). User requirements for analogical design support tools: Learning from practitioners of bio-inspired design. Design Studies, 58, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.11.006
Umney, D., & Lloyd, P. (2018). Designing frames: The use of precedents in parliamentary debate. Design Studies, 54, 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 UPSI Press
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
