Demographic Dynamics of Data Analytics Readiness: A Comparative Exploration of Chinese Higher Education Faculty?

Authors

  • Han Yu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/

Keywords:

Big data, DELTA, Higher education

Abstract

Amid the growing imperative for digital transformation in higher education, the readiness of academic faculty to adopt data analytics tools remains underexplored, particularly in the Chinese context. This study investigates the influence of demographic and professional characteristics on faculty readiness for big data analytics (BDA) across International Scholarly Exchange Curriculum (ISEC) and non-ISEC institutions. The primary objective is to examine differences in BDA readiness across variables such as ISEC affiliation, gender, professional rank, and educational background. Using a non-experimental causal-comparative design, data were collected from 154 full-time faculty members across 10 Chinese universities. A modified DELTA+ model served as the assessment framework, covering six key dimensions of analytics readiness: data, enterprise, leadership, targets, technology, and analysts. Statistical analysis using t-tests and two-way ANOVA revealed that while most readiness dimensions did not significantly differ, technology readiness was significantly higher among non-ISEC faculty. Gender, rank, and education showed no main effects, though a significant interaction between ISEC status and education was observed. These findings underscore the complexity of technological readiness and suggest that institutional affiliation and educational background interact in shaping analytics capabilities. The study calls for targeted institutional policies and further research to refine professional development strategies in higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adrian, C., Abdullah, R., Atan, R., & Jusoh, Y. Y. (2017, July). Factors influencing to the implementation success of Big Data Analytics: A systematic literature review. In 2017 international conference on research and innovation in information systems (ICRIIS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Aldraiweesh, A. A., Alturki, U., Alamri, M. M., Saud, M. S. B., ... & Alhamed, O. A. (2019). Big data adoption and knowledge management sharing: An empirical investigation on their adoption and sustainability as a purpose of education. Ieee Access, 7, 47245-47258.

Arviansyah, M. R., Azis, Y., Sondari, M. C., & Harsanto, B. (2024). Current trend and future research agenda for technological innovation in higher education institutions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-11.

Baker, J. (2011). The technology–organization–environment framework. Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society, Vol. 1, 231-245.

Bao, W. (2020). COVID‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human behavior and emerging technologies, 2(2), 113-115.

Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and artificial intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068

Bijker, W. E. (1997). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. MIT press.

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Çelik, F., & Baturay, M. H. (2024). Technology and innovation in shaping the future of education. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 54.

Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., & Papadopoulos, T. (2024). Examining the impact of deep learning technology capability on manufacturing firms: Moderating roles of technology turbulence and top management support. Annals of Operations Research, 339(1), 163-183.

Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 189-211.

Connell, R. (2013). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. John Wiley & Sons.

Curry, E. (2016). The big data value chain: Definitions, concepts, and theoretical approaches. New horizons for a data-driven economy: A roadmap for usage and exploitation of big data in Europe, 29-37.

Daniel, B. K. (2017). Big data in higher education: The big picture. In Big data and learning analytics in higher education: current theory and practice (pp. 19-28). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Daniel, S. J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49(1), 91-96.

Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2014). Data-driven leadership. John Wiley & Sons.

Davenport, T. H. (2014). Big data at work: Dispelling the myths, uncovering the opportunities. Harvest Business Review Press.

Davenport, T. H., Harris, J., & Morison, R. (2010). Analytics at work: Smarter decisions, better results. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

Feenberg, A. (2012). Questioning technology. routledge.

Gibson, D. (2017). Big data in higher education: Research methods and analytics supporting the learning journey. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22, 237-241.

Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The milbank quarterly, 82(4), 581-629.

Hiran, K. K., & Henten, A. (2020). An integrated TOE–DoI framework for cloud computing adoption in the higher education sector: case study of Sub-Saharan Africa, Ethiopia. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 11, 441-449.

Król, K., & Zdonek, D. (2020). Analytics maturity models: An overview. Information, 11(3), 142.

Markus, M. L. (2004). Technochange management: using IT to drive organizational change. Journal of Information technology, 19(1), 4-20.

Morley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsey, L., & Elhalal, A. (2020). From what to how: An initial review of publicly available AI ethics tools, methods and research to translate principles into practices. Science and engineering ethics, 26(4), 2141-2168.

Noble, D. (2017). Forces of production: A social history of industrial automation. Routledge.

Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization science, 11(4), 404-428.

Proudfoot, D. E., Green, M., Otter, J. W., & Cook, D. L. (2018). STEM certification in Georgia's schools: A causal comparative study using the Georgia student growth model. Georgia Educational Researcher, 15(1), 16-39.

Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations the free Press of Glencoe. NY, 32, 891-937.

Selwyn, N. (2015). Data entry: Towards the critical study of digital data and education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 64-82.

Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers?: AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons.

Tasmin, R., & Huey, T. L. (2020). Determinants of big data adoption for higher education institutions in Malaysia. Research in Management of Technology and Business, 1(1), 254-263.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 157-178.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-27

How to Cite

Han Yu. (2025). Demographic Dynamics of Data Analytics Readiness: A Comparative Exploration of Chinese Higher Education Faculty?. Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought, 15(2), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.37134/