Improving Secondary School Students Critical Thinking Skills in The Production of Visual Artworks through the Ard Critical Thinking Taxonomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/kupasseni.vol13.sp.5.2025Keywords:
Taxonomy, Routine Thinking, Advanced Thinking, Conceptual Thinking, Strategic ThinkingAbstract
Critical thinking skills are important to students' creativity in the production of visual artworks. Past studies have not delved deep into the role of these skills among students. Past findings also revealed that the level of critical thinking skills among the Visual Art Education (VAE) teachers are far from satisfactory. In fact, there is no specific guide for adopting the critical production process that can be referred to by VAE teachers and curriculum designers. Therefore, this study aims to identify the influence of critical thinking on students' creativity in the process of producing visual artworks. This study also aims to evaluate the ARD Critical Thinking Taxonomy (or known as Taksonomi Pemikiran Kritis ARD) that has been developed for teacher to use as a guide by VAE teachers. The Design and Development method has been employed with the inclusion of the Requirements Analysis, Design and Development, and Evaluation phases. Findings reveal that all ARD TPK constructs reach expert consensus in addition to successfully determining the ranking of critical thinking according to priority, starting with Routine Thinking, Advanced Thinking, Conceptual Thinking and Strategic Thinking. The findings of this study also display that ARD TPK is capable of increasing students critical thinking especially creativity. The findings also suggest that the ARD TPK is very vital to all parties, especially the Malaysian Ministry of Education (MOE) in emphasising the development of the individual's potential in an integrated and comprehensive manner in line with the Malaysian Philosophy of Education.
Downloads
References
Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching critical thinking skills: Literature review. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 21–39.
Brookfield, S. D. (2011). Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions. John Wiley & Sons.
Day, M., & Hurwitz, A. (2012). Children and their art: Art education for elementary and middle schools. Nelson Education.
Gamar Al Haddar, & Nurul Azmi. (2020). The use of technology aids in increasing student motivation at elementary school. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Islam, 137–149.
Herrity, J. (2024). 5 top critical thinking skills (and how to improve them). Indeed.
ISME, Melaka.
Lowenfeld, V., & Lambert, B. (1965). Creative and mental growth (4th ed.). The Macmillan Co.
Nor Azzian Bashah, & Alizah Lambri. (2024). Kesediaan guru terhadap penerapan KBAT dalam pengajaran kemahiran menulis karangan Bahasa Melayu di sekolah rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara, 17(2), 103–113.
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and development research. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 141–150). Springer.
Rosli Zakaria. (2014). ‘Piramid Seni’ model asas penghasilan karya seni. Paper presented at the Kolokium ISME, Melaka.
Rui, E., & Wei, T. L. (2023). Profile of critical thinking results analyzed from Facione indicators and gender of learners. International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(4), 434–446.
Sumarni, W., & Kadarwati, S. (2020). Ethno-STEM project-based learning: Its impact on critical and creative thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11–21.
Sumner, R. W., Schmid, J., & Pauly, M. (2007). Embedded deformation for shape manipulation. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 (pp. 80–es).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ardiana Aziz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


