The Role of Intermediaries in the Art World and their Impact on the Value of Artworks

Authors

  • Galih Jatu Kurnia Program Studi Pendidikan Seni Rupa, Fakultas Pendidikan Seni dan Desain, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229 Bandung, Indonesia
  • Yukki Setiawan Program Studi Pendidikan Seni Rupa, Fakultas Pendidikan Seni dan Desain, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229 Bandung, Indonesia
  • Zakiah Pawitan Program Studi Pendidikan Seni Rupa, Fakultas Pendidikan Seni dan Desain, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229 Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/kupasseni.vol13.sp.8.2025

Keywords:

Intermediaries, Art world, Art Value

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of the role and function of intermediaries on the value of artworks. It describes and elaborates on the role of art intermediaries in the art world and how this value is interpreted by various stakeholders in the art community. This research employs a qualitative approach using a systematic literature review design, encompassing data collection, data analysis, coding, synthesis, and validity testing. The findings indicate that the role of intermediaries in the art ecosystem is crucial in dynamizing the social field of art. They serve as connectors between artists, artworks, and the public. Galleries, museums, curators, art critics, collectors, and art agents play diverse roles in shaping, promoting, and distributing artworks. Art intermediaries not only facilitate transactions but also help establish the reputations of artists and the credibility of their works. Their influence extends to shaping perceptions of the aesthetic, historical, and cultural value of artworks through organizing exhibitions, writing art criticism, and documenting art history. Additionally, intermediaries mediate dialogues between traditional and contemporary art practices, bridging gaps between creators and audiences. This dynamic role contributes significantly to the valuation process, which impacts not only economic aspects but also societal appreciation of art. By understanding these roles, stakeholders can better navigate the complexities of the art market and contribute to a more inclusive and vibrant art ecosystem.

References

Antal, A. B. (2012). Artistic intervention residencies and their intermediaries: A comparative analysis. Organizational Aesthetics, 1(1), 44–67. https://oa.journals.publicknowledgeproject.org/index.php/oa/article/view/5

Barker, C. (2004). Cultural studies: Teori & praktik. Kreasi Wacana.

Bentcheva, E. (2022). Fluxus resonances in Southeast Asia. Southeast of Now: Directions in Contemporary and Modern Art in Asia, 6(1), 33–68. https://doi.org/10.1353/SEN.2022.0002

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706QP063OA

Campbell, M., Evans, C., & Wowk, L. (2022). Strategies for social engagement: Arts-service organizations as organizational intermediaries. Poetics, 92, 101652. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POETIC.2022.101652

Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Damajanti, I., Sabana, S., & Adriati, I. (2014). Kajian aspek ketidaksadaran dalam karya seni rupa Indonesia periode 2000-2011. Journal of Urban Society’s Arts, 1(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.24821/JOUSA.V1I1.785

Dewi, C. S. (2021). Modul pelatihan berbasis kompetensi kurator seni rupa. Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. http://repository.ikj.ac.id/889/

Hastarika, G. (2021). Akses dalam praktik pemerantaraan kesenian di Indonesia - ProQuest. Antropologi Indonesia, 42(2), 125–138.

Heinich, N. (2012). Mapping intermediaries in contemporary art according to pragmatic sociology. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(6), 695–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549412450634

Hujatnikajennong, A. (2015). Kurasi dan kuasa: Kekuratoran dalam medan seni rupa kontemporer di Indonesia. Marjin Kiri.

Ilyas, K. B., & Marcelleno, M. J. (2016). Arts marketing: Peran, interaksi, dan proses dalam medan seni rupa kontemporer di Jakarta (pendekatan kualitatif). Universitas Prasetiya Mulya.

Jesica, E. S., & Budiman, Ch. (2019). Ranah seni rupa Indonesia: Kolektor, pasar, dan penahbisan karya. Imajinasi: Jurnal Seni, 13(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/IMAJINASI.V13I2.21945

Khairudin, K. A., Rashid, M. S. A., Gani, M. A. A. A., Yahaya, M. H., Zamari, Z. M., & Hamzah, A. F. A. (2022). Types and styles of painting preferred by a hotel in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment, 9(2), 21–36. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/myse/article/view/18826

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson.

Latifah, N. L., Anugrah, D. A., Aynani, M. D., & Garini, K. W. (2013). Kajian sistem pencahayaan yang mempengaruhi kenyamanan visual pada ruang A dan ruang sayap galeri Selasar Sunaryo. Reka Karsa: Jurnal Arsitektur, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.26760/REKAKARSA.V1I3.295

Muniz, A. M., & O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1086/319618

Nugroho, A. S. (2013). Desain sebagai “dagangan” simbolik. Deiksis, 5(01), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.30998/DEIKSIS.V5I01.460

Pakpahan, Y. E., Hasugian, C., Warat, M. D. I., Sari, Y. M., & Anugrah, J. (2023). Peningkatan motivasi kewirausahaan dan pengelolaan keuangan pada siswa SMA Negeri 1 Berastagi. INCOME: Indonesian Journal of Community Service and Engagement, 2(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.56855/INCOME.V2I1.226

Papaioannou, D., Sutton, A., & Booth, A. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5018623

Parta, I. W. S. (2009). Pengoleksian karya seni rupa sebagai gaya hidup. Jurnal Imaji Maranatha, 4(2), 176–189.

Potash, J. (2011). Art therapists as intermediaries for social change. Journal of Art for Life, 2(1). https://journals.flvc.org/jafl/article/view/84095

Saul, B. H. (1982). Art worlds. University of California Press.

Stevenson, M. (1993). The art market, its intermediaries and the components of value of art works in an historical perspective [University of Cape Town]. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/21499

Suminar, L. (2017). Galeri seni sebagai ruang publik dan pendukung identitas kota Yogyakarta. Academia.

Supangkat, J. (2017). Seni dan kurasi di perguruan tinggi seni. Jurnal Seni Nasional Cikini, 1(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.52969/JSNC.V1I1.49

Susanto, M. (2004). Menimbang ruang menata rupa. Galangpress Group.

Undiana, N. N. (2018). Seni dan media massa: Pengelolaan informasi seni rupa dalam media baru. ATRAT: Jurnal Seni Rupa, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.26742/ATRAT.V6I2.693

Wanlie, W. (2012). Produksi budaya dalam seni grafiti. Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiologi, 17(2), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.7454/MJS.v17i2.1200

Yudistira, G. P., Endriawan, D., & Trihanondo, D. (2020). Analisis keberadaan pelukis Jelekong dalam medan sosial seni rupa di Bandung dan faktor penyebab eksistensinya dapat bertahan hingga sekarang. EProceedings of Art & Design, 7(2). https://openlibrarypublications.telkomuniversity.ac.id/index.php/artdesign/article/view/12508

Zulfikli, Z. (2021). Seni rupa di era disrupsi: Dampak teknologi dalam medan sosial seni rupa. Gondang, 5(1), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.24114/GONDANG.V5I1.24964

Downloads

Published

2025-04-18

How to Cite

Kurnia, G. J., Setiawan, Y., & Pawitan, Z. (2025). The Role of Intermediaries in the Art World and their Impact on the Value of Artworks. KUPAS SENI: Jurnal Seni Dan Pendidikan Seni, 13(Isu Khas), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.37134/kupasseni.vol13.sp.8.2025