Mapping Research on Physical Education Teachers in China: A Bibliometric Analysis using Citespace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/jsspj.vol14.sp.10.2025Keywords:
physical education (PE), institutions, funding characteristics, research hotspotsAbstract
This study aims to systematically map and analyse research trends on physical education (PE) teachers in China using bibliometric methods. Literature data were retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, covering publications from 2014 to 2024, and analysed using CiteSpace V. A total of 1,660 journal articles were examined to identify publication trends, core journals, influential authors, key research institutions, funding characteristics, and research hotspots based on keyword co-occurrence analysis. The results show that the overall number of publications on PE teacher research in China has exhibited a declining trend over the past decade, with studies mainly concentrated in sports-related journals. Author analysis indicates a broad distribution of researchers but a relatively small group of core authors, including Zhao Fuxue, Yin Zhihua, Wang Jian, and Dong Guoyong. East China Normal University, Central China Normal University, and Beijing Sport University emerged as the most influential research institutions. In addition, the proportion of funded studies remains relatively low and is dominated by national-level projects. Keyword analysis reveals that research has primarily focused on college and primary and secondary school PE teachers, professional development, physical education teaching, and job burnout, reflecting sustained academic attention to teacher professionalisation within the context of educational reform. This bibliometric analysis provides an overview of the knowledge structure and evolution of PE teacher research in China and offers a reference for future studies seeking to expand research perspectives and strengthen interdisciplinary collaboration.
Downloads
References
Bornmann, L. (2013). What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 217–233.
Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2), 1–40.
Chen, C., Hu, Z., Liu, S., & Tseng, H. (2012). Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 12(5), 593–608.
Chen Dong, Xiong Yuanqi, & Zhao Hua. (2017). Quantitative visualization analysis of foreign physical education teacher research. Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education, 51(12), 80–87.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431.
Kirk, D. (2010). Physical education futures. Routledge.
Liang, B. I., & Su, Y. H. (2017). Reflections on physical health education of teenagers from the perspective of “Healthy China”. Hubei Sports Science, 36(12), 1103–1108.
Qiu, J., & Wu, F. (2011). Visual analysis of hot topics and frontiers in library and information science research in the past five years: A quantitative study based on high-impact foreign journals. Journal of Library Science in China, 37(192), 51–60.
Sokolov, M., & Ximen, Z. (1951). Training of physical education teachers in the Soviet Union. People’s Education, (7), 44–46.
Wagner, C. S., Roessner, J. D., Bobb, K., Klein, J. T., Boyack, K. W., Keyton, J., Rafols, I., & Börner, K. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research. Scientometrics, 87(2), 251–273.
Zhong, B. (2017). From quality education to core literacy: Not merely a change of terminology. China School Physical Education, (2), 1–3.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ali Md Nadzalan, Guan Huiyin, Noorzaliza Osman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
