# A Comparative study of log volume estimation by using statistical method

### Abstract

Log volume estimation is a measurement of the amount of merchantable volume and precise estimation of log volume plays an important role in sustainable forest management. There are several log volume formula which commonly used in estimating the log volume, however, there are significant differences between each formula. Therefore, this paper evaluates the performance of three different log volume formula which are Smalian’s, Huber’s and Bruce’s formula against several log sectional length. The performance of each log volume formula will be evaluated in terms of the bias, precision and accuracy of the estimation. The result shows that Huber’s formula performs the best for log sectional length of 2 m, 4 m, 6 m and 8 m log sectional length. The log sectional length and prediction accuracy is inversely related whereby the shorter the log sectional length, the better the prediction accuracy is.

### References

[2] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 1997. State of the World’s Forests. Rome, Italy.

[3] Shari, N.H.Z., Ahmad, W.M.S.W., Musa, S., Mohd., W.R.W., and Ismail, H., 2010. Development of Local Volume Table for Second Growth Forests Using Standing Tree Measurements. Malaysian Forester, 73 (2), pp.163–170.

[4] Davis, L.S., Johnson, K.N., Bettinger, P., and Howard, T.E., 2001. Forest Management: To Sustain Ecological, Economic, and Social Values. 4th ed. Long Grove, USA: Waveland Pr Inc.

[5] Li, C., Barclay, H., Hans, H., and Sidders, D., 2015. Estimation of Log Volumes: A Comparative Study. Canada.

[6] Alemdag, I.S., 1978. An Analytical Look at the Log Volume Formulas. Canada.

[7] Freese, F., 1973. A Collection of Log Rules. U.S.D.A. Forest Service General Technical Report FPL 1. Madison, Wisconsin.

[8] Grave, H.S., 1906. Forest Mensuration. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[9] León, G.C. de and Uranga-Valencia, L.P., 2013. Theoretical Evolution of Huber and Smalian Methods Applied to Tree Stem Classical Geometries. Bosque, 34 (3).

[10] Ormerod, D.W., 1985. Scaling and Smalian’s Formula: Time to Change? Forest Chron, 61 (1), pp.28–30.

[11] Ozçelik, R., JR., H.V.W., and Brooks, J.R., 2006. Estimating Log Volumes of Three Tree Species in Turkey by Six Formulae. Forest Prod J Journal, 56 (November/December), pp.84–86.

[12] Jr., J.A.K., Ducey, M.J., Beers, T.W., and Husch, B., 2016. Determination of Tree Volume, Weight and Biomass. In: Forest Mensuration. Wiley-Blackwell, pp.135–183.

[13] Fonweban, J.N., 1997. Effect of Log Formula, Log Length and Method of Measurement on the Accuracy of Volume Estimates for Three Tropical Timber Species in Cameroon. Commonw Forest Rev, 76 (2), pp.114–120.

[14] Chapman, H.H. and Meyer, W.H., 1949. Forest Mensuration. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co.

[15] Loetsch, F., Zöhrer, F., and Haller, K.E., 1973. Forest Inventory. 2nd ed. Munich: BLV Verlagsgesellchaft.

[16] Husch, B., Miller, C.I., and Beers, T.W., 1982. Forest Mensuration. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[17] Walther, B.A. and Moore, J.L., 2005. The Concepts of Bias, Precision and Accuracy, and Their Use in Testing the Performance of Species Richness Estimators, with a Literature Review of Estimator Performance. Ecography, 28 (6), pp.815–829.

*EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology*,

*7*(1), 22-28. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/EJSMT/article/view/2458