The level of relationship between athletes and coaches among sport school students in Malaysia


  • Mon Redee Sut Txi Faculty Sport Science and Coaching, Sultan Idris Education University, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia



coach-athlete relationship, coaches, athletes, sport school students


Coaches and athletes of different sport background can have a marked influence on their relationship. The objective of this study was to compare the relationship level between the athlete and coach, among sport school students. In addition, this study aimed to compare the level of athlete to coach relationship and vice versa. The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q) is used in the data collection process. In this study, the measurement is made from the contract of interpersonal relationships (closeness, commitment and complementarity). The findings are presented in the form of descriptive statistics. The comparison and relationship among variables was determined using t-tests and Pearson correlation tests. The study found that there was a significant correlation between coaches in the team sports category with the closeness of t = 2.098, sig = 0041* (p <0.05). The study also found that there was a correlation between the total time of training in a week with the commitment of athletes r = 0.155, sig = 0.016* (p <0.05). These findings indicate that the coaches have a higher level of closeness compared with athletes. Meanwhile, it appears to be no problem with athletes’ commitment with the training period set by their coach. It can be concluded that, the higher the level of interpersonal qualities (closeness, commitment and complement) the higher the level of relationship between athletes and coaches.



Download data is not yet available.


Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (1989). Issues in studying close relationships: concepsualising and measuring closeness. In. C. Hendric (Ed.), Close relationships (pp. 63-91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Carron, A. V., Hausenblas, H. & Eys, M. A. (2005). Group dynamics in sport (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Carron, A. V., Eys, M. A., & Burke, S. M. (2007). Team cohesion. In S. Jowett, & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 91-102). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Hinde, R.A. (1997). Relationship: A dialectical perspective. London, UK: Psychology Press.

Jowett, S., & Meek, G. A. (2000). The coach-atlhlete relationship in married couples: An exploratory content analysis. The Sport Psychologist, 14, 157-175.

Jowett, S., & Crokerill, I. M. (2002). Incompatibility in the coach-athlete relationship. In I. M. Crockerill (Ed.), Solutions in sport psychology (pp. 16-31). London: Thomson Learning.

Jowett, S., & Nthoumanis, N. (2004). The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q): Developtmen and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine ans Science in Sport, 14, 245-257.

Jowett, S. & Poczwardowski, A. (2007). Understanding the Coach-Athlete Relationship. En S. Jowett y D. Lavallee (Eds.) Social psychology in sport. Champaing IL, Human Kinetics. Pp. 3-14

Lorimer, R. and Jowett, S. 2009. Empathic accuracy, meta-perspective, and satisfaction in the coach-athlete relationship. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 21(2): pp.201-212.

Mallett, C. (2004). Reflective practices in teaching and coaching using reflective journals to enhance performance. In J. Wrighth, D. Macdonald & L. Burrows (Eds), (ritical enquiry and problem solving in physical education (pp.147-158). London. Routledge.

Salminen, S., & Liukkonen, J. (2009). Coach-athlete relationship and coaching behavior in training sessions. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 27, 59-67.

Smoll, F.L. y Smith.R.E.(2009).Claves para ser un entrenadorexcelente.Barcelona:Inde.

Sullivan, P.J., & Kent, A. (2003). Coaching efficacy as a predictor of leadership style in intercollegiate athletics. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 15, 1–11.

Wurther, P. (2009). Success of coach athlete relationship (Canadian Olympic study): Canada.




How to Cite

Sut Txi, M. R. (2019). The level of relationship between athletes and coaches among sport school students in Malaysia. Jurnal Sains Sukan & Pendidikan Jasmani, 8(2), 42–49.