Assessing Institutional Readiness for Blended Learning Management and Implementation in Malaysian Higher Education

Authors

  • Punitha Kathirveloo Faculty of Management and Economics, Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/mrj.vol13.2.5.2024

Keywords:

Higher Education Institutions, corporate governance, blended learning management and implementation

Abstract

This paper aimed to examine the readiness of Malaysian Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) to improve teaching and learning activities in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) by emphasizing on the practice of good governance by Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) by emphasizing on the practice of good governance by Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) through the deployment of National E- Learning Policy (DePAN 2.0). The policy incorporates six domains: infrastructure and infostructure, governance, e-content, blended learning, professional development and enculturation through a strategic e-learning framework to facilitates HEIs towards globalised online learning. The discussion is further broadened into exploring the four concepts of good governance: accountability, participation, persistency, transparency and its governing influence towards the application of six domains from DePAN 2.0 as the mechanism to constantly monitor and assess the effectiveness of blended learning management and implementation in HEIs. A comparative analysis approach is used to study existing literatures, models and conceptual frameworks involving blended learning and governance in Malaysian Higher Education context contributing to key findings suggesting student acceptance and lecturer adoption significantly impact institutional readiness in blended learning implementation and effective governance is critical for promoting greater student acceptance and faculty adoption of blended pedagogies. This study findings have profound impacts for policymakers and higher education institutions (HEIs), emphasizing the necessity for strategic interventions to enhance governance practices, support faculty development, and foster a conducive learning environment to fully leverage the benefits of blended learning in Malaysia’s higher education landscape.

Author Biography

  • Punitha Kathirveloo, Faculty of Management and Economics, Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia

    Ministry of Education, Malaysia

References

Agboola, A.K. (2005) A Study of readiness towards the introduction of e-learning as a teaching and learning environment among lecturers: A case study of the International Islamic University Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation, International Islamic University Malaysia).

Anuar Yusof, Esther, G.S.D., Wah, Y.L., & Kamarulzaman Aziz. (2015). Students’ preparedness for blended learning through social network sites: Inspiring Active Learners. Proceedings of Edulearn15 Conference, 6-8 July 2015, Barcelona, Spain.

Asian Development Bank. (1996). Basic Information. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

Asian Development Bank. (2005). Details on governance frameworks.

Azizan, F. Z. (2010). Blended Learning in higher education institution in Malaysia. Proceedings of Regional Conference on Knowledge Integration in ICT, 454-466. Retrieved from https://library.oum.edu.my/oumlib/sites/default/files/file_attachments/odl-resources/4334/blended-learning.pdf

Chan, M. S., Fauzi, M. F., Juhari, S. N., Aliman, N., Rajoo, M., Abdul Wahab, N. M., & Magiman, M. M. (2022). Blended learning practices in Malaysia higher education: A review. Mathematical Statistician and Engineering Applications, 71(3), 1497–1507. Retrieved from https://www.philstat.org/index.php/MSEA/article/view/1497

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0047239520934018

Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. (2011). Dasar e-pembelajaran negara institusi pengajian tinggi. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia.

Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia, (2021). Dasar e-Pembelajaran Negara (Depan) 2.0. from

Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. (2021).Dasar e-Pembelajaran Negara (DePAN) 2.0. Retrieved from https://utlc.uum.edu.my/images/2021/DePAN-20.pdf

Farazmand, A. (2012). Sound Governance: Engaging Citizens through Collaborative Organizations. Public Organization Review, 12(3), 223-241.

Farazmand, A. (2015). Governance in the Age of Globalization: Challenges and Opportunities for South and Southeast Asia. Governance in South, Southeast, and East Asia, 11-26.

Garrison, D., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.

Goh, C. F., & Wong, K. T. (2014). Implementation of Blended Learning in Higher Learning Institutions: A Review of Literature. International Education Studies, 7(11), 1-9. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1071195.pdf

Graham, J., et al. (2003). Governance principles on protected areas in the 21st century. A discussion paper. Institute on Governance, the Fifth World Bark Congress, Dublin.

Güzer, B., & Caner, H. (2014). The past, present and future of blended learning: An in-depth analysis of literature. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 116, 4596–4603

Haron, H., Abbas, W. F., & Rahman, N. A. (2012). The Adoption of Blended Learning among Malaysian Academicians. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 175-181.

Henkel, M. (2007). Can academic autonomy survive in the knowledge society? A perspective from Britain. Higher Education Dynamics Governing Knowledge, 26 (1). 87-99

Horn, M. B., Staker, H., Hernandez, A., Hassel, B., & Ableidinger, J. (2011). The rise of K–12 blended learning. Retrieved from http://www.christenseninstitute.org/publications/the-rise-of-k12-blended-learning/

Inman, E., Kerwin, M. & Mayes, L. (1999). Instructor and Student Attitudes toward Distance Learning. Community College Journal of Research and Practice. 23 (6), 581-591

Jordan, A., et al. (2003). Has governance eclipsed government? Pattern of environmental instrument selection and use in eight states and the EU, CSERGE working paper EDM 03-15, University of East Anglia, Norwich.

Kaur, M. (2013). Blended Learning - Its Challenges and Future. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 93, 612–617.

Kim, W. (2007). Towards a definition and methodology for blended learning. In J. Fong, & F. L. Wang (Eds), Proceedings of Workshop on Blended Learning 1-8. Edinburgh, UK: Pearson, 2007.

Kohler-Koch, B., & Rittberger, B. (2006). Review Article: The Governance Turn in EU Studies*. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(S1), 27-49.

Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.um.edu.my/docs/default-source/about-um_document/media-centre/ummagazine/4-executive-summary-pppm-2015-2025.pdf

Ma'arop, A. H., & Embi, M. A. (2016). Implementation of Blended Learning in Higher Learning Institutions: A Review of the Literature. International Education Studies, 9(3), 41-52. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1093338.pdf

Masrom, M., et al. (2008). Critical Success in E-Learning: An Examination of Technological and Institutional Support Factors. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education. 1(2), 131-142.

Melton, B. F., Bland, H., & Chopak-Foss, J. (2009). Achievement and Satisfaction in Blended Learning versus Traditional General Health Course Designs. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1)

Okaz, A.A. (2015). Integrating Blended Learning in Higher Education. Proceeding of 5th World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership, WCLTA 2014. 600-603

OECD. (2021). The State of Higher Education: One Year into the COVID-19 Pandemic. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/state-of-higher-education-2021-50a1ba4e-en.htm

Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (TRI): A multiple scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research,2(4),307-320.

Richards, D., & Smith, M. J. (2002). Governance and public policy in the United Kingdom. Oxford University Press.

Rosenberg, M. J., & Foshay, R. (2002). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. Performance Improvement, 41(5), 50-51.

Sabri, N. M., Isa, N., Daud, N. M., & Aziz, A. A. (2010). Lecturers’ experiences in implementing blended learning using i-Learn. In 2010 International Conference on Science and Social Research (CSSR 2010).

Schneider,V. (2004) State theory, governance and the logic of regulation and administrative control. In: Warntjen A, Wonka A (eds) Governance in Europe. Nomos.

Shoniregun, C. A., & Gray, S. (2003). Is e-learning really the future or a risk? Ubiquity, 2003(April), 1-1.

Tiihonen, S. (2004). From governing to governance. Tampere University Press.

Wong, K. T., Hamzah, M., Goh, P. S. C., & Yeop, M. A. (2016). Blended Learning Engagement in Higher Education Institutions: A Differentiated Approach between Public and Private Universities in Malaysia. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 10(4), 55-61. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1248868.pdf

Zhang, Y. (2010). Application of blended learning model based on PCR. In 2010 International Conference on E-Health Networking Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (EDT).

Zhu, C., Valcke, M., Schellens, T., & Li, Y. (2009). Chinese students’ perceptions of a collaborative e-learning environment and factors affecting their performance: Implementing a Flemish e-learning course in a Chinese educational context. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(2), 225-235.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-20

How to Cite

Kathirveloo, P. (2024). Assessing Institutional Readiness for Blended Learning Management and Implementation in Malaysian Higher Education. Management Research Journal, 13(2), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.37134/mrj.vol13.2.5.2024