Enhancing the Royal Malaysian Navy Effectively Through Competency Management

Authors

  • Raida Abu Bakar Universiti Malaya, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
  • Muhamad Zafran Whab Universiti Malaya, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/mrj.vol10.2.7.2021

Keywords:

Competency, Human Resources, Core Value, Meaningfulness, Royal Malaysian Navy

Abstract

The article discusses the concept of a competency approach to the management of HR and the concepts that are most reliable in the management of training. An alternative competency paradigm is established based on existing theory and actual evidence. The primary goal of this paper is to explore the value of a competency approach as a human resource strategy for advocating the organization's expected responsibilities, talents, and activities. The paper also discusses potential roadblocks to implementing a competency-based approach to HRM in a specific setting. That is, a new dimensional approach for the HR and Training Division considers the notion of meaningfulness and the internalization of the core values of the Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN). The discourse of the study is that there are challenges in implementing a competency strategy which could be the rationale for the Navy People not internalizing a concrete element in their career path. This paper proposed a conceptual and well-developed model, a competency management approach that would improve promotion, development, selection, and reward procedures in order to suit both organisational and individual needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allan, B. A., Duffy, R. D., & Collisson, B. (2018). Task Significance and Performance: Meaningfulness as a Mediator. Journal of Career Assessment, 26(1), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716680047

Bass, B. I., Cigularov, K. P., Chen, P. Y., Henry, K. L., Tomazic, R. G., & Li, Y. (2016). The effects of student violence against school employees on employee burnout and work engagement: The roles of perceived school unsafety and transformational leadership. International Journal of Stress Management, 23(3), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000011

Bragger, J. D., Reeves, S., Toich, M. J., Kutcher, E., Lawlor, A., Knudsen, Q. E., & Simonet, D. (2019). Meaningfulness as a Predictor of Work-Family Balance, Enrichment, and Conflict. Applied Research in Quality of Life.

Chalofsky, N., & Krishna, V. (2009). Meaningfulness, commitment, and engagement: the intersection of a deeper level of intrinsic motivation. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422309333147

Deci, Edward L.; Olafsen, Anja H.; Ryan, Richard M. (2017). Self-Determination Theory in Work Organizations: The State of a Science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19–43.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Hayes, J.L (1979), ‘A New Look At Managerial Competence: The AMA Model of Worthy Performance’, Management Review, November, pp, 2-3.

Jaradat, R. M., Keating, C. B., & Bradley, J. M. (2018). Individual Capacity and Organizational Competency for Systems Thinking. IEEE Systems Journal, 12(2), 1203–1210.

Kahn, William A. 1990 "Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work." Academy of Management Journal, 33: 692-724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287

Karen Lo, Keith Macky & Edwina Pio (2015) The HR competency requirements for strategic and functional HR practitioners, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26:18, 2308-2328. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1021827

Kelly, K. M. 2001. Individual Differences in Reactions to Rejection. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), (pp. 291-315). New York: Oxford University Press.

Kotter, J. P. (1990a). What leaders really do. Harvard Business Review, 68, 103-111.

Lips-Wiersma, M., & Wright, S. (2012). Measuring the Meaning of Meaningful Work: Development and Validation of the Comprehensive Meaningful Work Scale (CMWS). Group and Organization Management, 37(5), 655–685.

Mahmood, A., Nudrat, S., Asdaque, M. M., Nawaz, A., & Haider, N. 2011. Job Satisfaction of Secondary School Teachers: A Comparative Analysis of Gender, Urban and Rural Schools. Asian Social Science, 7(8), 203–208.

Made Jiwa Astika, & Okol Sri Suharyo. (2021). The analysis of environmental factor for improving of navy resources performance. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 6(3), 049–055.

May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety, and availability, and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11-37. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892

Nonaka, I and R Toyama (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1, 2–10.

Olivier, A.L., & Rothmann, S. (2007). Antecedents of work engagement in a multinational oil company. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 33(3), 49-56.

Orth, U., & Robins, R. W. (2014). The Development of Self-Esteem. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 381–387.

Pudiastuti, E. T. (2020). The Operational Management Of Navy Human Resources For Improving The Quality Of Navy Personnel, 11(02), 228–235.

Quek, P. N. (2006). Building capability through cognitive apprenticeship: The Singapore armed forces competency-based learning project. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 5(3), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649206001426

Rendon, Rene G. (2015). Benchmarking contract management process maturity: a case study of the US Navy. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(7), 1481–1508.

Royal Malaysian Navy Sea Power Centre, December 24, 2021. Arahan Pentadbiran Peraduan Mengarang Essi Maritim TLDM 2021, SPC.100-2/1/9 V2-(11).

Royal Malaysian Navy HQ, H.D. (2011). Royal Malaysian Navy Core Value. HQ RMN.

Shet, S. V., Patil, S. V., & Chandawarkar, M. R. (2019). Competency-based superior performance and organizational effectiveness. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(4), 753–773. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2018-0128

Spencer L Spencer S 1993 Competence at Work: A Model for Superior Performance (New York: Wiley).

Steger, M. F., Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2012a). Measuring Meaningful Work: The Work and Meaning Inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 322–337.

Sutton, A., and Watson, S. (2013), "Can competencies at selection predict performance and development needs?", Journal of Management Development, Vol. 32 No. 9, 1023-1035. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-02-2012-0032

Swanson, R. A., and Holton, E. F·. (2001) Foundations of Human Resource Development, San Francisco: Barrett-Kuehler.

Rothwell, W. J., & Lindholm, J. E. (1999). Competency identification, modelling and assessment in the USA. International journal of training and development, 3(2), 90-105. https://doi.org /10.1111/1468-2419.00069

Young, M. and Dulewicz, V. (2005), "A model of command, leadership and management competency in the British Royal Navy", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 228-241.

Zaim, H., Kurt, I., & Tetik, S. 2012. Causal Analysis of Employee Satisfaction and Performance: A Fıeld Study In The Fınance Sector. International Journal of Business And Management Studies, 4(2), 31–42.

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Abu Bakar, R., & Whab, M. Z. (2021). Enhancing the Royal Malaysian Navy Effectively Through Competency Management. Management Research Journal, 10(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.37134/mrj.vol10.2.7.2021