The Practice Level Amongst Middle Leaders Teachers of School to Increase Quality of Teachers and Achievements of Students Refer to Standard Quality Education of Malaysia Wave 2

Pengamalan Pemimpin Pertengahan Bagi Meningkatkan Kualiti Guru dan Pencapaian Murid Merujuk Standard Kualiti Pendidikan Malaysia gelombang 2

  • Rozali bin Din Pejabat Pendidikan Daerah Kinta Selatan, Perak, MALAYSIA
Keywords: Middle Leaders Team Practice, Standard Quality Education of Malaysia wave 2, quality of teachers and achievement of students

Abstract

This preliminary study aims to observe 2 domains of Standard Quality Education of Malaysia wave 2, refer to management of subject, namely planning to increases quality of teacher and increases achievement of students in South Kinta District Education Office, Perak, Malaysia. The finding of previous studies to develop teachers then we need to develop Middle leaders who became the liaison with the Highest Leader in the school.  A total of 134 Middle Leaders Team of 22 primary and   secondary schools were respondents in this study. This study uses a questionnaire quantitative approach. Data were collected using the questionnaire instrument. The overall finding of min and percentage scores indicates that Middle Leaders Team competence is at the Moderate Level. The highest overall achievement score was the Middle Leaders Team increase achievement domain to increases achievement of students, which was 2.68 and the lowest achievement was in an increase quality of teacher, which was 2.61. Through the study we hope the Middle Leaders shall render the Standard Quality Education of Malaysia wave 2 as a tool and reference to increases quality of teacher and increases achievement of students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah Sani Yahya, Abdul Rashid Mohamed, & Abdul Ghani Abdullah. (2007). Guru sebagai pemimpin. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Profesional.

Ab.Halim Tamuri dan Mohamad Khairul Azman Ajuhary. (2010). Amalan Pengajaran Guru Pendidikan Islam Berkesan Berteraskan Konsep Mu’alim. Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education 2(1), 43-56.

Abu Hassan dan Meor Ibrahim. (1997). Latihan mengajar : Apakah persediaan guru pelatih? Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia is

Angelle, P. S., Nixon, T. J., Norton, E. M., &Niles, C. A. (2011). Increasing organizational effectiveness: An examination of teacher leadership, collective efficacy, and trust in schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Pittsburgh, 19 Nov. 2011.

Awang, Z. (2012). Structual Equation Modeling Using Amos Graphic. Universiti Teknologi Mara.

Azizah Lebai Nordin (1999). Guru Pendidikan Islam yang Berkesan. Masalah Pendidikan. Jilid 22. Kula Lumpur : Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya.

Ball. D. L. & Garton, B. L. (2005). Modelling higher order thinking: The alignment between objective, classroom discourse and assessment. Journal of Agricultural Education, 46(2), 58-69.

Barr, J., Sommerness, J., & Hur, J. (2008).Teacher leadership. In T. Good (Ed.), 21st Century education: A reference handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Barth, J. (2001). Teacher leader. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(4).

Belasen, A., & Belasen, A. R. (2016). Value in the middle: cultivating middle managers in healthcare organizations. Journal of Management Development.(B) Pembangunan-Model-Kompetensi-Pemimpin-Pertengahan-Satu-Kajian-Reka-Bentuk-dan-Pembangunan-Article-Info-Abstract.pdf

Clelia Della Rovere. (2013). Teacher leadership in Professional Learning Communities such as Networks.York Region District School Board.

Comrey, A. L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Danielson, C. (2007). The many faces of leadership. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 14-19.

De Nobile, J. (2018) Towards a theoretical model of middle leadership in schools, School Leadership & Management, 38(4), 395-416, DOI:10.1080/13632434.2017.1411902 (B) Pembangunan-Model-Kompetensi-Pemimpin-Pertengahan-Satu-Kajian-Reka-Bentuk-dan-Pembangunan-Article-Info-Abstract.pdf

Ding, J., Kuo, J., & Tai, W. (2019). A fuzzy evaluation model of choosing a middle manager for an international shipping service provider, Brodogradnja, 70(1), 93–107. Diperoleh daripada http://dx.doi.org/10.21278/brod70107 (B) Pembangunan-Model-Kompetensi-Pemimpin-Pertengahan-Satu-Kajian-Reka-Bentuk-dan-Pembangunan-Article-Info-Abstract.pdf

Drs. Sardjono, M. (22 Disember, 2012). Makalah Kompetensi Profesional Guru. Retrieved from Rangkaian Pendidikan Agama Islam: http://fajriamentari.blogspot.my/2012/12/makalah-kompetensiprofesional-guru.html. Muat turun pada 12 Februari 2019.

Elsabé de Villiers & SG (Fanie) Pretorius. (2011). Democracy in schools: Are educators ready for teacher leadership? South African Journal of Education, 31, 574-589.

Gallagher, D. R., Bagin, D., & Moore, E. H. (2005).The school and community relations. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Ghani, M. F. A. (2013). Amalan Komuniti Pembelajaran Profesional:Perspektif Pemimpin Sekolah Cemerlang Negara Maju. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 10- 27.

Grant, C., Gardner, K., Kajee, F., Moodley, R.,& Somaroo, S.(2010). Teacher leadership: A survey analysis of KwaZulu-Natal teachers’ perceptions. South African Journal of Education, 30,

Grootenboer, P. (2018). The Practices of School Middle Leadership. Leading Profesional Learning. Springer Nature Singapore Ptd Ltd. Guillén, L., & Saris, W. E. (2013). (B) Pembangunan-Model-Kompetensi-Pemimpin-Pertengahan-Satu-Kajian-Reka-Bentuk-dan-Pembangunan-Article-Info-Abstract.pdf

Hair, J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2010). Professional learning communities and system improvement.Improving Schools, 13(2),172-181.

Holmes-Smith, P., Coote, L., & Cunningham, E. (2005). Structural equation modelling : From the fundamentals to advanced topics. Melbourne, Australia: School Research, Evaluation and Measurement Services.

Hussein Mahmood. (2005). Kepimpinan profesionalisme: Satu utopia? Pemimpin, 5, 39-51.

Institute for Educational Leadership. (2008).Teacher leadership in high schools:How principals encourage it,how teachers practice it. . Retrieved from www.iel.org/pubs/metlife_teacher_report

Iskandar. (2008). Metadologi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosial (Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif). Jakarta : Gaung Persada Press. Jld. 6.

Jackson, T., Burrus, J., Bassett, K., & Roberts, R. (2010). Teacher leadership:An assessment framework for an emerging area of professional practice. Princeton, NJ: ETS.

Kamaruddin Kachar (1989). Kepimpinan Profesional dalam Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur : Publishing Sdn. Bhd.

Kamarul Azmi Jasmi & Ab Halim Tamuri, (2007). Pendidikan Islam:Kaedah P&P. Skudai :Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2001). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2009). Standard Guru Malaysia.

Modul 2 TS25,2017. Model proses Pembelajaran (What’s in the black box between learning environment and learning outcomes) – Adaptasi daripada Vermunt

Kemeterian Pendidikan Malaysia (2017). SKPMg2 sebagai panduan membantu pihak sekolah melaksanakan tugas mereka untuk merancang,melaksana,menyemak,memantau dan membuat penambahbaikan kepada kaedah dan langkah-langkah pengoperasian sekolah sepanjang tahun.Penerbitan dari Jemaah Nazir Malaysia Ogos 2017

Killion, J., & Harrison, C. (2006). Taking the lead: New roles for teachers and school-based coaches. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.

Maizura Yasin & Nur Surayyah Madhubala Abdullah (2018) Kerelevanan Pendidikan Moral dalam Memenuhi Keperluan Revolusi Industri 4.0 yang Beretika: Sudut Pandangan Guru Pelatih. Dlm. Proseding Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan Universiti Awam 2018.Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin.

Mohd.Khidin Shahran (1995).Statistik Perihalan dan kebarangkalian.Dewan Bahasa dan Pusaka. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia .

Mortimore, P. (1997). Key characteristics of effective schools.Jendela Minda, 1(1), 1-35.

Neuman, W.L. (2003). Social Research Methods. Qualitative and Quantitative and Quantitative Approaches. (5th edition). Boston:Pearson Education.

Neumann, M. D., Jones, S. C. L., & Webb, P. T. (2012). Claiming the political: The forgotten terrain of teacher leadership knowledge. Action in Teacher Education, 2-13.

NIE. (2009) A Teacher Education Model for the 21st Century, A Report by the National Institute of Education. Nanyang Institut of Education, Singapore:Nanyang Institute.

Noor Alina Mohd Ngali. (2009). Kesediaan Guru Terhadap Pengajaran Kemahiran Amali Dalam Kurikulum Pendidikan Vokasional. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn. Tesis Sarjana Muda.

Noraini Idris dan Shuki Osman (2009). Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran: Teori Praktis. Kuala Lumpur : Mc Graw Hill.

Norazizah Che Mat (2018). Reka bentuk model kepimpinan berkesan Institut Pendidikan tinggi Majlis Amanah Rakyat. (Tesis kedoktoran tidak diterbitkan) Lembah Pantai: UM.(B)

Northouse, P.G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Nur Hafizoh Idris, & Rohana Hamzah.(2012). Nilai profesionalisme bakal guru berteraskan Indikator Standard Guru Malaysia (SGM).Jurnal Teknologi.

Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452219486

Patton, (1990). Qualitative evaluation anda research method. Thousand, Osaka, CA: Sage

Rohana Hamzah. (2010). Mengenali manusia asas pendidikan berkualiti.Skudai: UTM Press.

Rost, J. C. (1991). Leadership for the twenty-first century. Westport, CO: Praeger.

Rajendran. N.S (2001). Pengajaran Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi: Kesediaan Guru Mengendalikan Proses Pengajaran Pembelajaran. Seminar Projek KBKK: Poster “Warisan Pendidikan Wawasan” Anjuran Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.

Rosnani Hashim & Suhailah Hussien (2003). The Teaching of thinking in Malaysia (1st ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Research Centre IIUM .

Shahbudin Hahim, Rohizani Yaakub, dan Mod Zohir Ahmad. (2006). Pedagogi dan Strategi Teknik Mengajar dengan Berkesan.Selangor : PTS Publications & Distributor Sdn Bhd.

Sarvinder Singh, & Ahmad Bin Esa. (2008). Kepimpinan dalam menghadapi isu-isu semasa pendidikan. Dimuat turun daripada http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/2712/1/21._PKPGB_2008_1.pdf

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (5th ed.). West Sussex, UK: Wiley.

Simpson J.D, Jackson J.BM, Aycock C. Judy, (2005). John Dewey and The Art of Teaching. http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/2712/1/21._PKPGB_2008_1.pdf

Sharratt, L., & Fullan, M. (2009).Realization: The change imperative for deepening district-wide reform. Thousand . California : Sage Publications Inc.

Spencer, Lyle M. Jr, & Spencer, Signe M. (1993). Competence at Work, models for superior performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Teacher Leadership Exploratory Consortium Letter. (2010). Retrieved from http://tlstandards.weebly.com

Traversi, D. M. (2007). Eight Drivers of the High-Impact Leader. Retrieved from http://www.leader-values.com/Content/detail.asp?ContentDetailID=1308

Yin, R.K. (2003) Case Study Research : Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Thausand Oaks: Sage Publication.

York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004).What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74, 255–316.

Yusnita A.R. (2003) Pengetahuan Terhadap Penyediaan Rancangan Perniagaan:Satu Tinjauan di Kalangan Pelajar-pelajar Tahun Akhir Sarjana Muda Kejuruteraan

Zamri Mahamod, Ruslan Amir & Mohamed Amin Embi. (2015). Kepelbagaian Pelajar dan Perbezaan Pembelajaran. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Published
2021-10-12
How to Cite
Din, R. (2021). The Practice Level Amongst Middle Leaders Teachers of School to Increase Quality of Teachers and Achievements of Students Refer to Standard Quality Education of Malaysia Wave 2. Management Research Journal, 10, 106-118. https://doi.org/10.37134/mrj.vol10.sp.9.2021