Penilaian Program Bina Insan Bitara Terhadap Pembangunan Holistik Mahasiswa Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Evaluation of the Bina Insan Bitara Program on the Holistic Development of Students at Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/perspektif.vol18.1.2.2026Keywords:
Mahasiswa, Program Bina Insan Bitara (BIB), Pembangunan Holistik, Adab, AkhlakAbstract
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menilai keberkesanan Program Bina Insan Bitara (BIB) dalam memupuk pembangunan holistik dalam kalangan mahasiswa baharu di Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI). Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif melalui reka bentuk tinjauan keratan-lintang, data telah dikumpulkan daripada 2,507 responden yang mewakili sepuluh fakulti. Instrumen kajian merangkumi sepuluh konstruk pembangunan insan termasuk aspek akhlak, kepimpinan, dan daya tahan. Instrumen kajian berupa soal selidik yang telah melalui proses penentusan kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan yang ketat. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan tahap keberkesanan yang tinggi bagi kesemua konstruk, dengan konstruk akhlak mencatatkan skor min yang paling dominan. Analisis inferens turut mengenal pasti perbezaan persepsi yang signifikan berdasarkan jantina dalam konstruk tertentu seperti adab dan kreativiti. Implikasi kajian ini menekankan keperluan penambahbaikan berterusan dalam pengurusan logistik dan pengisian modul bagi memastikan kelestarian impak program terhadap sahsiah pendidik masa hadapan.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Bina Insan Bitara (BIB) Program in fostering holistic development among new undergraduates at Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI). Utilizing a quantitative approach through a cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 2,507 respondents representing ten faculties. The research instrument comprises ten human development constructs, including morality, leadership, and resilience, which underwent rigorous validity and reliability testing. The findings indicate a high level of effectiveness across all constructs, with the morality construct recording the most dominant mean score. Inferential analysis also identified significant perceptual differences based on gender in specific constructs such as manners and creativity. The implications of this study underscore the necessity for continuous improvement in logistics management and module content to ensure the sustainability of the program’s impact on the character development of future educators.
Downloads
References
Cahapay, M. (2021). Kirkpatrick Model: Its Limitations as Used in Higher Education Evaluation. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(1), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.856143
Cason, D., & Gillis, H. L. (1994). A meta-analysis of outdoor adventure programming with adolescents. Journal of Experiential Education, 17(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382599401700109
Devassy, S.M., Scaria, L., Metzger, J. (2023). Development of immersive learning framework (ILF) in achieving the goals of higher education: Measuring the impact using a pre–post design. Sci Rep 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45035-0
Hill, E., Stuart, S., & Dvorak, R. (2023). The impact of outdoor orientation programs on student flourishing and resilience in higher education. College Student Affairs Journal, 41(1), 59–72. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1375931.pdf
Jamaluddin, N. S., & Li Na. (2023). Applicability of constructivist-oriented teaching in the process of educational transformation in malaysia. International Business Education Journal, 16(1), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej/Vol.16.1.3.2023
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
Parekh, P., Gee, E., Tran, K., Aguilera, E., Pérez Cortés, L. E., Kessner, T., & Siyahhan, S. (2021). Board game design: an educational tool for understanding environmental issues. International Journal of Science Education, 43(13), 2148–2168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1956701
Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become. Charles Merrill.
Sibthorp, J., Paisley, K., & Gookin, J. (2007). Exploring participant development through adventure-based programming: A model from the national outdoor leadership school. Leisure Sciences, 29(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400600851346
Taff, M.A.M., Aziz, A.A. & Zakaria, J. (2011). Kerelevanan pendidikan luar dalam sistem pendidikan tinggi di Malaysia. Asean Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 3(1), 11-27
UNESCO. (1996). Learning: The treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000109590
World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. Geneva: World Economic. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abu Zarrin Selamat, Abdul Halim Masnan, Khalizul Khalid, Mohd Ikhwan Hadi Yaacob, Nazre Abdul Rashid , Yakup Mohd Rafee
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
