Strategi Pedagogi Inovatif dan Integrasi Teknologi untuk Meningkatkan Penglibatan dan Hasil Pembelajaran Murid dalam Pendidikan Biologi: Satu Ulasan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/perspektif.vol17.sp.5.2025Keywords:
pendidikan Biologi, pedagogi inovatif, teknologi pendidikan, penglibatan pelajar, motivasiAbstract
Artikel ini meninjau strategi pedagogi inovatif dan penggunaan teknologi dalam pendidikan Biologi melalui ulasan naratif terhadap 25 artikel terkini yang diterbitkan antara tahun 2020 hingga 2025. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahawa kaedah pengajaran berasaskan aktiviti seperti Claim-Evidence-Reasoning (CER), bilik darjah terbalik (flipped classroom) dan pembelajaran berasaskan projek (PBL) berkesan dalam meningkatkan penglibatan murid, memupuk minat serta mengukuhkan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi. Di samping itu, teknologi seperti realiti maya (VR), kecerdasan buatan (AI) dan platform pembelajaran dalam talian didapati menyokong pembelajaran interaktif serta menyediakan pengalaman yang lebih bersifat peribadi. Namun begitu, pelaksanaan strategi ini masih berdepan cabaran termasuk kos yang tinggi, jurang infrastruktur digital serta tahap kesiapsiagaan guru dan murid. Artikel ini menegaskan bahawa transformasi pembelajaran Biologi memerlukan pendekatan holistik yang merangkumi dasar pendidikan yang inklusif, latihan profesional berterusan dan pengukuhan komuniti amalan untuk menjamin keberkesanan serta kelestarian inovasi.
Downloads
References
Aleksandrovich, S. I., Ramazan, T., Utegaliyeva, R., Sarimbayeva, B., Keubassova, G., Bissalyyeva, R. N., Syman, K., & Abdikarimova, G. (2024). Transformative applications in biology education: A case study on the efficacy of adaptive learning with numerical insights. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 22(2), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.22124/CJES.2024.7731
Arslan, A., & Turk, M. (2024). Wikipedia as an academic service-learning tool in science and technology: Higher education case from Siberia. Journal of Community Genetics, 15(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-023-00692-6
Helikar, T., Cutucache, C. E., Dahlquist, L. M., Herek, T. A., Larson, J. J., & Rogers, J. A. (2015). Integrating interactive computational modeling in biology curricula. PLOS Computational Biology, 11(3), e1004131. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004131
Hmoud, M., Swaity, H., Karram, O., Shibli, H., Swaity, S., & Daher, W. M. (2023). High school students' engagement in biology in the context of XR technology. IEEE Access, 11, 137053–137066. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3338176
Kleinschmit, A. J., Rosenwald, A. G., Ryder, E. F., Donovan, S. S. S., Murdoch, B., Grandgenett, N. F., Pauley, M. A., Triplett, E. W., Tapprich, W. E., & Morgan, W. R. (2023). Accelerating STEM education reform: Linked communities of practice promote creation of open educational resources and sustainable professional development. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00405-y
Lacey, M. M., Francis, N. J., & Smith, D. P. (2024). Redefining online biology education: A study on interactive branched video utilisation and student learning experiences. FEBS Open Bio, 14(2), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.13767
Lewis, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance – do students see any relationship? International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289949
Morra, C. N., Fultz, R. S., & Raut, S. A. (2022). A lesson from the pandemic: Utilizing digital tools to support student engagement during instructional assistant-led sessions. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 23(3), e00143-22. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00143-22
Nur Izwani, N. (2021). Persepsi pelajar terhadap pembelajaran Biologi di sekolah menengah: Satu kajian kes. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Malaysia, 15(2), 45–56.
Radwan, I. A., El Moshy, S., Rady, D., Korany, N. S., Maaty, F. A. N. A., Elfaiedi, F. I., Monir, L. M., Ibrahim, M. S., Ragab, M. A., & Osman, N. M. R. (2025). The evolving landscape of oral biology education: A comparative study of teaching strategies. BMC Medical Education, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07338-w
Saber-Ayad, M. M. (2025). Discrepancies in global genomics education. In Genomics and Society (pp. 161–171). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-22384-6.00010-X
Shiaching, H. (2001). Different gender students' participation in the high- and low-achieving middle school questioning-orientated biology classrooms in Taiwan. Research in Science and Technological Education, 19(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140120087696
Tahtouh, M., Masri, N., Alfahel, M., Antar, G., Dayal, A., Khamis, H., Kuruvani, M., & Kachaamy, G. (2024). Exploring the virtual frontier: The impact of virtual reality on undergraduate biology education at the American University in Dubai. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(5), 675–680. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.5.2092
Taraboletti, A. A. (2024). Sourdough as a model organism for facilitating undergraduate biochemistry and biology education. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(3), 1180–1189. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00913
Theodosiou, N. A., Cassat Green, S., & Napier, E. C. (2025). Introducing societal issues in an upper level STEM course increases student engagement and knowledge transfer. Developmental Biology, 525, 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2025.05.029
U̧sak, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in biology education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(5), 806–808. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.806
Yanti, F., Lufri, L., Ahda, Y., Sepriani, R., & Ockta, Y. (2025). Web-based biology learning media for distance education: Systematic literature review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025109
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Asmahan Azmi, Salmiza Saleh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
