Relationship Between Motor Creativity and Science Process Skills of Preschool Children

Authors

  • Munevver Can Yaşar Child Development Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alaattin Keykubat University, Alanya, TURKİYE
  • Nezahat Hamiden Karaca Department of Preschool Education, Faculty of Education, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon, TURKİYE
  • Assoc. Dr Halil Uzun Department of Preschool Education, Kilisli Muallim Rifat Faculty of Education, Kilis 7 Aralık University, Kilis, TÜRKİYE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol11.2.10.2022

Keywords:

Scientific process skills, motor creativity, creativity, preschool education, early childhood development

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the relationship between scientific process skills and motor creativity in preschool children. The study group included 72 children attending kindergartens affiliated to Afyonkarahisar Provincial Directorate of National Education in Turkiye, with normal developmental characteristics, and determined by simple random sampling according to the principle of getting permission from their families. In the study, "General Information Form", "Scientific Process Skills Assessment Scale (SPSAS)" and "Thinking Creatively in Action and Movement (TCAM)" were used as data collection tools. In the analysis of the data obtained; descriptive statistics such as frequency and percentage were used to evaluate the demographic characteristics of children and their families. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between SPSAS and TCAM. As a result of the study, for the children's points from scales, no relationship was found between SPSAS sub-dimensions, and the fluency and originality sub-dimensions of the TCAM. However, a positive relationship was found between the observation, measurement, communication, prediction sub-dimensions of SPSAS, and imagination sub-dimension of TCAM.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilar, D. & Pifarre-Turmo, M. (2019). Promoting social creativity in science education with digital technology to overcome inequalities: a scoping review. Front. Psychol. 10,1-16.

Akman, B., Balat, G. U., Güler, T., Alabay, E., Büyüktaşkapu, S., Önkol, F. L., ... & Veziroğlu, M. (2010). Okul öncesi dönemde fen eğitimi. Pegem Akademi.

Aktamış, H. & Ergin, Ö. (2007). Bilimsel süreç becerileri ile bilimsel yaratıcılık arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 11-23.

Aktaş-Arnas, Y. (2002). Purposes of science education in preschool period, Çocuk Gelişimi ve Eğitimi Dergisi, 6- 7, s.1-6.

Alisinanoglu, F., Inan, H.Z., Ozbey, S., Usak, M., (2012) Early childhood teacher candidates` qualifications in science teaching, Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies Volume (issue) 4(1): 373-390

Andreasan, N. C. (2009). Yaratıcı Beyin: Dehanın Nörobilimi. Çev: Kıvanç Güney, Ankara: Arkadaş Yayınevi.

Aral, N. 1999. Sanat eğitimi- yaratıcılık etkileşimi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15,11-17.

Aral, N. ve Yıldız-Bıçakçı, M. 2014. Yaratıcı düşünme, (çeviri: N.Aral ve G. Duman), Englebright Fox, J. ve Schırrmacher, R. (eds), Çocuklarda sanat ve yaratıcılığın gelişimi.Nobel Yayıncılık, 20-31 s, Ankara.

Aslan, E., Aktan, E., & Kamaraj, İ. (2013). Impact of the Kindergarten Education on the creativity and problem-solving skills. Journal of Marmara University Faculty of Education, 9(9), 37-48.

Aydın-Ceran, S. (2010). Impact of the science activities developed with creative thinking skills upon student success and attitude. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Selçuk University Institute of Education Sciences, Konya.

Barrow, L. H. (2010). Encouraging creativity with scientific inquiry. Creative Education,1, 1-6.

Bournelli, P., Makri, A., & Mylonas, K. (2009). Motor creativity and self-concept. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 104– 110.

Brever, J. A. (2007). Introduction to early childhood education: Preschool through primary grades, Sixth edition. Pearson education, Inc., Boston-USA.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Handbook of data analysis for social sciences, Ankara:Pegem Citation Index.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, O. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2008). Scientific Research Methods, Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Gözüm, A. İ. C. (2019). 21. Yüzyıl Becerisi Olarak Yaratıcılık. E. Ömeroğlu ve H. Şahin (Ed.), 21. Yüzyıl Çocuklarının Eğitimi: 6C Modeli (1. Baskı) içinde (ss. 87–121). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.

Carin, A.A., Bass, E.J. & Contant, L.T. (2005). Teaching Science as Inquiry (Tenth Edition). USA: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Charlesworth, R. & Lind, K.K. (2007). Math & Science for Young Children (Fifth Edition). USA: Thomson Delmar Learning.

Çilengir Gültekin, S. (2019). Okul öncesinde eğitimde drama temelli erken STEM programının bilimsel süreç ve yaratıcı düşünme becerilerine etkisi (Master's thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).

Civelek, P., & Akamca, G. Ö. (2018). The effect of outdoor activities on scientific process skills of preschool children. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(6), 2011.

Daud, A.M., Omar, J., Turiman, P., & Osman, K. (2012). Creativity in science education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 467-474.

Delis, D. C., Lansing, A., Houston, W. S., Wetter, S., Han, S. D., Jacobson, M., et al. (2007). Creativity lost: The importance of testing higher-level executive functions in school-age children and adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25, 29–40

Dementiy, L. I., & Grogoleva, O. Y. (2016). The structure of responsibility of preschool and primary school age children. In Procedia -Social and behavioral Sciences (Vol. 233, pp. 372 –376).doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.161

Demirci, C. (2007). The effects of the creative approach in the science teaching on achievement and attitude. Fen bilgisi öğretiminde yaratıcılığın erişi ve tutuma etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32 (32), 65-75.

Denervaud, S., Knebel, J.F., Hagmann, P., & Gentaz, E. (2019). Beyond executive functions, creativity skills benefit academic outcomes: Insights from Montessori education. PloS one, 14(11), e0225319. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225319

Dikici, A., Özdemir, G. ve Clark, D. B. (2018). The relationship between demographic variables and scientific creativity: Mediating and moderating roles of scientific process skills. Research in Science Education, 1-25.

Diamond, A. (2000). Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Child Development, 71, 44–56.

Duda, H. J., Susilo, H., & Newcombe, P. (2019). Enhancing Different Ethnicity Science Process Skills: ProblemBased Learning through Practicum and Authentic Assessment. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1). 1207- 1222. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12177a

Duffy, B. 2006. Supporting imagination and creativity in the early years. Open University Press:208 p, Buckingham.

Edmondson, K.M., & Novak, J.D. (1993). The interplay of scientific epistemological views, learning strategies, and attitudes of college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(6), 547–559.

Fan, J. (2017). The application of imagination and creativity of young children-the example of rabbit qi. (Unpublished master thesis) Asia University. Tayvan.

Gelman, R., & Brenneman, K. (2004). Science learning pathways for young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 150–158.

Gill, A. F. (2019). A Study of Progression in Science Process Skills during a Midwestern Public Research University’s STEM Summer Camps (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University).

Gomes, J.J.M. (2005). Using a creativity-focused science program to foster general creativity ın young children: a teacher action research study. UMI: 3166419 ProQuest Information and Learning Company, USA.

Grammatikopoulos, V., Gregoriadis, A., & Zachopoulou, E. (2012). Acknowledging the role of motor domain in creativity in early childhood education. In O. N. Saracho (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on research in creativity in early childhood education (pp. 159–176). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Guilford, JP (1967). Yaratıcılık: Dün, bugün ve yarın.DergisiYaratıcı Davranış,1, 3-14.

Hadzigeorgiou, Y., Fokialis, P., & Kabouropoulou, M. (2012). Thinking about creativity in science education. Creative Education, 3(5), 603-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.35089.

Hansel, L. (2017). Creativity throughout the day. YC Young Children, 72(5), 6-7.

Harlen, W. (2000). Teaching, learning and assessing science process skills. Assessment in Education, 6(1),129-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09695949993044.

Harlen, W., and A. Qualter. 2004. The Teaching of Science in Primary Schools. London: David Fulton

Harmanlı, Z. (2002). Creativity and main significant factors in developing creativity. Dokuz Eylül University Kindergarten/Kindergarten Teacher Handbook. İstanbul: Ya-Pa Yayın Pazarlama.

Hasanah, U., & Shimizu, K. (2020). Crucial Cognitive Skills in Science Education: A Systematic Review. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 6(1), 36-72.

Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2010). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403.

Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912

Hu, W., Shi, Q. Z., Han, Q., Wang, X., & Adey, P. (2010). Creative scientific problem finding and its developmental trend. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 46-52.

Isbell, R. T., and Raines S.C. 2003. Creativity and the arts with young children. ThomsonDelmar Learning Printed: 352 p., Canada.

Justo, C.F. 2008. Creative relaxation, motor creativity, self-concept in a sample of children from early childhood education. Electronic Jurnal Of Rearch İn Educational Psyvhology, 6(1),29-50.

Kandır, Türkoğlu, Gözüm (2018) Evaluation of Turkish 2013 Pre-school Education Program of the Ministry of National Education in Terms of Science Activities. Current Trends in Pre-school Education-2, Ümit Deniz, Turhan Çetin, Nudzejma Obralıc, Vedat Bayraktar, Yakup Yıldırım, Editör, Lambert Academic Publishing, ss.60-81.

Karaca, N.H. & Aral, N. (2017). Adaptation of thinking creatively in action and movement test for Turkish children. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 42, 240-253

Karaca, N. H., Uzun, H., Metin, S., & Aral, N. (2020). Demographic factors associated with young children’s motor creativity. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(5), 1307–1319. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i5.5169

Karasar, N. (2013). Scientific Research Method (Vol.25). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

Kartal, O.Y. (2014). Imagination Education and Patent Production. Eğitim Philosophy of Education. Atatürk University AÖF.

Kefi, S., Çeliköz, N., & Erişen, Y. (2013). Preschool teachers’ levels of using the basic science process skills. Eğitim ve öğretim araştırmaları dergisi, 2(2), 300-319.

Kind, P.M. & Kind, V., (2007). Creativity in science education: perspectives and challenges for developing school science. Studies in Science Education, (4), 1-37.

Konstantinidou, E., Pollatou, E., & Zachopoulou, E. (2005). The effect of verbal instructions on preschool children’s motor creativity. Inquiries in Sport and Physical Education, 3, 90–97.

Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keselman, A., and Kaplan, D. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction 18: 495–523.

Kurtuluş, N. (2012). The effect of instructional applications based on creative thinking on scientific creativity, scientific process skills and academic achievement. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Trabzon.

Laban R (1975) Laban’s Principles of Dance and Movement Notation. 2nd edition, ed Lange R (MacDonald and Evans, London).

Lambert, A. (2019). Developing skills through creative problem-solving, Childhood Education, 95(4), 24-29.

Leggett, N. (2017). Early childhood creativity: challenging educators in their role to intentionally develop creative thinking in children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(6), 845-853.

Lestari, T. P., Sarwi, S., & Sumarti, S. S. (2018). STEM-based Project Based Learning model to increase science process and creative thinking skills of 5th grade. Journal of primary education, 7(1), 18-24.

Lin, Y. (2019). Do socially competent children have high levels of creativity? Investigating the relationship between social competence and creativity in Taiwanese children, International Journal of Education & Management Studies, 9(3), 171-176.

Lind, K. K. (2005). Exploring science in early childhood education, Fourth edition, Thomson Delmar Learning, New York, USA.

Martin, R. E., Sexton, C., Franklin, T., & McElroy, D. (2001). Teaching science for all children. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.

May, R. (2015), Yaratma Cesareti (Çev. Alper Oysal). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.

Mayesky, M. (2009). Creative social studies. In Creative activities for young children. USA: Delmar Cengage Learning.

Meador, K. (2003). Thinking creatively about science: Suggestions for primary teachers. Gifted Child Today, 26(1), 25-29.

Micklo, S. J. (1995). Developing young children’s classification and logical thinking. Childhood Education, 72(1), 24-28.

Omar, R., Putch, S, N., & Ikhsan, Z. (2014). Implementation of Science Process in Project Based Learning Through Collaborative Action Research. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Reform (ICER 2014), Innovations and Good Practices in Education: Global Perspectives. Faculty of education, The Nasional University of Malaysia.

Ormanci, Ü., & Çepni, S. (2019). Thematic analysis of conducted studies regarding preschool science education in Turkey. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(3), 415-439.

Özdemir, G. & Dikici, A. (2017). Relationships between scientific process skills and scientific creativity: Mediating role of nature of science knowledge. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 3(1), 52-68.

Özözer, Y. (2005). Ne Parlak Fikir! Yaratıcı DüĢünme Yöntemleri. 3. Basım. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık

Özözer, Y. (2005). Ne Parlak Fikir! Yaratıcı DüĢünme Yöntemleri. 3. Basım. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık

Pica, R. (2000). Experiences in movement: with music,activites and theory. Delmar Cengage Learning.

Rebecca R.B . (2011). Movement, art, and child development through the lens of an ınnovative use of the kestenberg movement profile. American Journal of Dance Therapy. DOI 10.1007/s10465-011-9112-8

Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (p.246-279). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ruiz Perez, L.M. 1995. El desarrollo de la competencıa motrız en la eso y su evaluacıón. http://www.ub.edu/Vcongresinternacionaleducacionfisica/userfiles/file/MesasRedondas/MR5RuizPerez.pdf

Schmidt, A. L. (2010). The battle for creativity: Frontiers in science and science education. Bio Essays, 32(12), 1016-1019.

Scibinetti, P., Tocci, N., & Pesce, C. (2011). Motor creativity and creative thinking in children: The diverging role of inhibition. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 262-272.

Sedef, A. (2012). The effect of creative drama activities on elementary school seventh grade students’ scientific process skills, scientific creativity and self-regulation. Unpublished Master Thesis Pamukkale University, Institute of Science, Denizli.

Siew, N M., Chong, C L. and Chin, K O. (2014) Developing a Scientific Creativity Test for Fifth Graders Problem of Education in the 21st Century, edited by Vincentas Lamanauskas (Scientia Educologica, Lithuania, 2014) 109-123

Sturza-Milić, N. (2012). Motor Knowledge accumulation and motor creativity manifestation. Research in Pedagogy, 2(2), 54-64.

Taconis, R., Ferguson‐Hessler, M. G., & Broekkamp, H. (2001). Teaching science problem solving: An overview of experimental work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 442-468.

Tekerci, H. & Kandır, A. (2018). The study of validity-reliability of scientific process skills assessment scale for 48-66-month-old children. In: R. Efe, I. Koleva & E. Atasoy (Eds.), Recent Researches in Education (pp.313-325). UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Torrance, E.P. (1981). Thinking creatively in action and movement. Bensenville, IL: Scolastic Testing Service.

Tocci, N., Scibinetti, P., & Zelli, A. (2004). Age and gender differences in motor creativity among Italian elementary school children. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 46, 89–104

Trevlas, E., Matsouka, O., & Zachopoulou, E. (2003). Relationship between playfulness and motor creativity in preschool children. Early Child Development and Care, 173, 535–543

Tu, T.H. (2001). Teacher-child verbal interaction in preschool science teaching. (Unpublished dissertation thesis). Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Iowa State, Ames, Iowa.

Ünal, M. (2019). 4-6 yaş okul öncesi çocuklarına etkinlik temelli STEM eğitiminin bilimsel süreç becerilerine etkisinin incelenmesi (Master's thesis, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü).

Ünal, M., & Aksüt, P. (2021). 4-6 yaş çocuklarına etkinlik temelli STEM eğitiminin bilimsel süreç becerilerine etkisinin incelenmesi. Erken Çocukluk Çalışmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 109-134.

Vandervert, L. R., Schimpf, P. H., & Liu, H. (2007). How working memory and the cerebellum collaborate to produce creativity and innovation. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 1–18.

Wang, J.H. T. 2003. The effects of creative movement progrem on motor creativity and gross motor skills of presschool children. Doctor thesis (unpublished).The Universty of South Dakota, 137 p, South Dokato.

Wyrick, W. (1968). The development of a test of motor creativity. Research Quarterly, 39,756–765.

Worth, K., & Grollman, S. (2003). Worms, shadows, and whirlpools: Science in the early childhood classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Worth, K. (2010). Science in early childhood classrooms: Content and process. Early Childhood Research & Practice , 12(2).

Yamin, T.S. (2010). Scientific creativity and knowledge production: theses, critique, and implications. Gifted and Talented International, 25(1), 7-12.

Zachopolou, E., & Makri, A. (2005). A developmental perspective of divergent movement ability in early young children. Early Child Development and Care, 175, 85–95.

Zachopoulou, E., Makri, A., & Pollatou, E. (2009). Evaluation of children’s creativity: Psychometric properties of Torrance’s Thinking Creatively in Action and Movement test. Early Child Development and Care, 179, 317–328.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-27

How to Cite

Can Yaşar, M., Karaca, N. H., & Uzun, H. (2022). Relationship Between Motor Creativity and Science Process Skills of Preschool Children. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 11(2), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol11.2.10.2022