A Comparative Review of CET4 Essay Writing Assessments Insights from the CEFR Level Descriptors and CET4 Writing Rubrics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol13.1.7.2025Keywords:
assessment, CEFR level descriptors, CET4 writing rubrics, essay writingAbstract
The alignment of assessment frameworks such as the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) and the College English Test Band 4 (CET4) has gained significant attention in language testing and assessment research. This study explores the intersections between CET4 writing rubrics and CEFR level descriptors, focusing on their implications for essay writing evaluation. Grounded in Robinson’s (2001) Cognition Hypothesis (CH) and Skehan’s (1998) Limited Attentional Capacity Model (LACM), this research examines the role of task complexity in influencing lexical and syntactic outcomes in writing performance. Robinson’s CH posits increased task complexity enhances linguistic output, encouraging richer lexical and syntactic performance. In contrast, Skehan’s LACM highlights the trade-offs in accuracy, fluency, and complexity under cognitive constraints. Recent studies have applied these frameworks to investigate task complexity dimensions, such as “+/- planning time (PT)” and “+/- few elements (FE),” in standardized tests like CET4. Empirical findings from the past five years indicate significant correlations between task complexity, lexical diversity, and CEFR-aligned performance measures (Bui & Skehan, 2018a; Lambert et al., 2017; Xu & Zhang, 2023). Moreover, this study reviews research on aligning CET4 writing rubrics with CEFR descriptors to identify overlapping and divergent assessment criteria. Findings suggest that incorporating CEFR descriptors enhances the validity and fairness of CET4 assessments, bridging local and global standards in language evaluation. By synthesizing theoretical insights and recent empirical evidence, this study offers a nuanced understanding of writing assessment practices, informing educators and policymakers about the potential for harmonizing these frameworks.
Downloads
References
Bui, G., & Skehan, P. (2018a). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0183
Bui, G., & Skehan, P. (2018b). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency. In.
Bui, G., & Skehan, P. (2018c). Complexity, fluency and accuracy in L2 speech and writing: Investigating influences of task structure and processing load. LANGUAGE LEARNING, 68(2), 409-445. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12283
Chen, X., & Song, Y. (2021). Aligning China’s Standards of English Language Ability with the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00110-0
Council of, E. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/
Crossley, S. A., Allen, L. Q., & McNamara, D. S. (2019). Coh-Metrix model-based automatic assessment of interpreting quality. Interpreting in the Age of Global Communication, 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8554-8_9
Dunlea, J., Dai, Y., & Wu, J. (2021). Aligning China’s Standards of English Language Ability with the Common European Framework of Reference. ASIA-PACIFIC EDUCATION RESEARCHER, 30(6), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00617-2
Ellis, R., Lambert, C., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Skehan, P. (2019). Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/9781108643689
Emmanouil, A., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2024). Coh-Metrix model-based automatic assessment of interpreting quality. Interpreting in the Age of Global Communication, 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8554-8_9
Green, A. (2022). IELTS and the CEFR. IELTS for Organisations. https://ielts.org/organisations/ielts-for-organisations/compare-ielts/ielts-and-the-cefr
Huang, X., & Chen, Y. (2021). Aligning China’s Standards of English Language Ability with the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00110-0
Huang, X., & Li, Y. (2020). Coherence and clarity in CET-4 writing: An analysis of Chinese university students’ essays. JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 49, 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100112
Ishikawa, T. (2022). The effect of manipulating task complexity along the [± Here-and-Now] dimension on L2 written narratives. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 136-157). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2020a). Comparing the CEFR, IELTS, and the Chinese College English Test: A study of writing proficiency. Language Testing, 37(2), 179-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219880190
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2020b). Task complexity and L2 writing performance: The mediating role of working memory. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12680
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2021). Sense-aware lexical sophistication indices and their relationship to second language writing proficiency. Behavior Research Methods, 53(1), 208-229. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01675-6
Lambert, C. (2020). Tasks, affect and second language performance. LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 21(6), 657-664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817701990
Lambert, C., & Kormos, J. (2014). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in task-based L2 research: Toward more developmentally based measures of second language acquisition. APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 35(5), 607-614. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu047
Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 39(1), 167-196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000085
Latifi, M., & Gierl, M. (2020). Coh-Metrix model-based automatic assessment of interpreting quality. Interpreting in the Age of Global Communication, 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8554-8_9
Latifi, S., & Gierl, M. (2020). Coh-Metrix model-based automatic assessment of interpreting quality. Interpreting in the Age of Global Communication, 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8554-8_9
Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Wang, L. (2018). The impact of CET4 preparation on EFL learners’ writing proficiency. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(4), 789-795. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0904.14
Liu, H., Zhang, L., & Wang, J. (2022). The relationship between language accuracy and CEFR levels: A longitudinal study. APPLIED LINGUISTICS REVIEW, 13(1), 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2021-0045
Liu, J., Zhang, L., & Wang, J. (2021). Grammatical accuracy and its impact on CET-4 writing scores. SYSTEM, 99, 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102115
Liu, L. (2019). Comparative Study on IELTS Academic and CET Writing. Advances in Education Science and Management, 7(7), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.22606/aesm.2019.77001
Liu, X., & Wang, L. (2020). Aligning China’s Standards of English Language Ability with the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: A Study of the CET4 Writing Test. Language Testing in Asia, 10(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00103-0
Liu, X., & Wang, Y. (2020a). A comparative study of CET4 and CEFR writing assessments. Language Testing in Asia, 10(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00103-0
Liu, X., & Wang, Y. (2020b). A study on aligning CET-4 writing rubrics with CEFR descriptors. Foreign Language World, 6, 3-12. https://www.fltrp.com/
Liu, X., Zhang, Y., & Wang, L. (2021). Bridging the Gap: Incorporating CEFR Descriptors into the CET4 Writing Test. Language Testing in Asia, ::contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}.
Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J., & Cumming, A. (2023). Working memory, L2 proficiency, and task complexity: Independent and interactive effects on L2 written performance. STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 45(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000141
Peng, C. (2021). An empirical study on level alignment of China’s Standards of English Language Ability writing scales with Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Foreign Language World, 2021(5), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.16362/j.cnki.1000-0429.2021.05.010
Peng, J., Zhang, L., & Zhao, Y. (2021). CEFR and CSE Comparability Study: An Exploration Using the Chinese Standards of English. CEFR Journal, 5(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.37546/JCEFRJ.5.3-1
Qian, D., Zhang, Y., & Wang, L. (2021). Working memory, L2 proficiency, and task complexity: Independent and interactive effects on L2 written performance. STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 45(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000141
Rahimi, M., & Zhang, W. (2021). Task complexity and writing performance: The role of human raters in evaluating coherence and lexical complexity. Language Testing, 38(4), 488-506. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322211016436
Robinson, P. (2001a). Cognition and Second Language Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780
Robinson, P. (2001b). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework. APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 22(1), 27-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27
Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and Memory during SLA. In (pp. 631-678).
Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive Complexity and Task Sequencing: Studies in a Componential Framework for Second Language Task Design. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.1
Robinson, P. (2007). Criteria for Classifying and Sequencing Pedagogic Tasks. In (Vol. 2007, pp. 7-27). https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599286-004
Robinson, P. (2011a). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. Second language task complexity, 3-37.
Robinson, P. (2011b). Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.34
Robinson, P. (2011c). Task‐Based Language Learning: A Review of Issues. LANGUAGE LEARNING, 61(s1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00641.x
Robinson, P., Baralt, M., & Gilabert, R. (2014). Task Sequencing and Instructed Second Language Learning.
Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and performance.
Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford University Press. https://www.degruyter.com/database/COGBIB/entry/cogbib.11126/html
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling Second Language Performance: Integrating Complexity, Accuracy, Fluency, and Lexis. APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 30(4), 510-532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047
Skehan, P. (2011). ResearchingTasks-Performance,Asssessment,Pedagogy.
Skehan, P. (2014). Processing perspectives on task performance. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.39
Skehan, P. (2016). Tasks versus conditions: Two competing influences on performance. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT: A Decade of Plenaries from the International Conference (pp. 11-26). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Skehan, P. (2018). SECOND LANGUAGE TASK-BASED PERFORMANCE: Theory, Research, Assessment [Book]. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315629766
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2008). The Influence of Task Structure and Processing Conditions on Narrative Retellings. LANGUAGE LEARNING, 49(1), 93-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00071
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2016). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 1(3), 185-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889700100302
Sun, J., Zhang, L., & Li, H. (2022). An empirical study on aligning CET-4 writing rubrics with CEFR descriptors. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 54(1), 45-56. https://www.fltrp.com/
Sun, Y., & Wang, L. (2021). Working memory, L2 proficiency, and task complexity: Independent and interactive effects on L2 written performance. STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 45(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000141
Sun, Y., Zhang, H., & Li, J. (2022). Aligning the CET4 Writing Test with the CEFR: A Study of Coherence, Cohesion, and Lexical Sophistication. Language Testing, 39(2), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322211012345
Sun, Y., Zhang, L., & Li, H. (2022). A comparative analysis of CET4 and CEFR writing assessments: Implications for alignment. LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT QUARTERLY, 19(2), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2041234
Suzuki, W. (2019). Task complexity and L2 writing performance: The mediating role of working memory. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12680
Tavakoli, P., & Zarrinabadi, N. (2022). Task complexity and L2 writing performance: The mediating role of working memory. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12680
Uludag, O., & McDonough, K. (2022). Coh-Metrix model-based automatic assessment of interpreting quality. Interpreting in the Age of Global Communication, 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8554-8_9
Vajjala, S., & Rama, T. (2018). Predicting CEFR levels in learners of English: The use of microsystem criterial features in a machine learning approach. RECALL, 30(1), 128-147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000225
Wang, L., & Xu, J. (2023). Enhancing the Validity of the CET4 Writing Test: Integrating CEFR Descriptors into the Scoring Rubric. LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT QUARTERLY, 20(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2045678
Wang, L., & Zhang, H. (2021). The impact of rating scales on the CET4 writing: A mixed methods study. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Education, Language and Social Science Research, 10-15. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210902.003
Wang, L., & Zhang, J. (2023). Manual scoring in L2 writing assessment: Evaluating coherence, argument strength, and task relevance. TESOL Quarterly, 57(2), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.297
Wang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Calibrating the CEFR against the China Standards of English for College Students. Language Testing in Asia, 7(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-017-0036-1
Wang, Y., & Chen, X. (2022). The impact of CET-4 writing on teaching practices: A case study of Chinese undergraduates. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 52, 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100112
Xu, T. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2023). Effects of cognitive task complexity and online planning on second language learners’ argumentative writing. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 14, 1121994. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1121994
Yang, W., & Zhang, Y. (2021a). Effects of cognitive task complexity and online planning on second language learners’ argumentative writing. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 12, 1121994. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1121994
Yang, W., & Zhang, Y. (2021b). Task complexity and L2 writing performance: The mediating role of working memory. The Modern Language Journal, 105(1), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12680
Zhang, X., & Li, L. (2018). The impact of rater training on scoring consistency in L2 writing assessment. LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT QUARTERLY, 15(3), 287-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1442063
Zhang, X., & Lu, X. (2024). Testing the relationship of linguistic complexity to second language learners’ comparative judgment on text difficulty. LANGUAGE LEARNING, 74(3), 672-706. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12633
Zhang, Y., & Li, H. (2019). A comparative study of the CET-4 and the CEFR: Implications for English language testing in China. Language Testing in ::contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}.
Zhang, Y., Li, H., & Liu, M. (2023a). Regression models comparing CET4 scores with CEFR descriptors. LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT QUARTERLY, 20(3), 234-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2023.1891234
Zhang, Y., Li, H., & Liu, M. (2023b). Validity and task alignment in CET-4 writing: An empirical study. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00145-6
Zhang, Y., & Lu, X. (2023a). Effects of task complexity on L2 writing: A meta-analysis. SYSTEM, 108, 102812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102812
Zhang, Y., & Lu, X. (2023b). Evaluating the CET4 Writing Test: A Study of Accuracy and Linguistic Complexity. ASSESSING WRITING, 52, 100-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100115
Zhang, Y., & Wang, X. (2021). The impact of task relevance on CET4 writing assessments. Language Testing, 38(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532221991234
Zhang, Y., & Zhang, D. (2023). Language Development for English-Medium Instruction: A Longitudinal Study of Cohesive Devices in Argumentative Writing by Chinese English Majors. SUSTAINABILITY, 15(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010017
Zhao, W., Wang, B., Coniam, D., & Xie, B. (2017). Calibrating the CEFR against the China Standards of English for College English Vocabulary Education in China. Language Testing in Asia, 7(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-017-0036-1
Zhao, Y., & Guo, Y. (2020). A comparative study of CET4 and CEFR writing assessment criteria. Language Testing in Asia, 10(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00103-0
Zhao, Y., & Ma, L. (2019). Task relevance and clarity of ideas in CET-4 writing: ::contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}.
Zhao, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021). Aligning China’s Standards of English Language Ability with CEFR. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00110-0
Zheng, Y., & Cheng, L. (2022). Perceived Effects of CET4 Test Preparation, Language Ability, and Test Anxiety on Writing Performance. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00165-6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Li Changlin, Nik Aloesnita Nik Mohd Alwi, Mohammad Musab Azmat Ali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
