Pragmatic Analysis of Opening-Closing Arguments at Trump’s Impeachment Trial

Authors

  • Mazura Mastura Muhammad Faculty of Languages and Communication Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI), Malaysia
  • Dalia M. Hamed Faculty of Education, Tanta University, Egypt
  • Sharmini Garneshan Bock and Partners, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Wesam M. A. Ibrahim Applied College Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Saudi Arabia Faculty of Education Tanta University, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol13.2.7.2025

Keywords:

deictic expressions, pragmatics, Schiff’s arguments, Trump impeachment, vague category markers

Abstract

Donald Trump, the 45th president of the United States, was impeached on the eighteenth of December in 2019, when the House of Representatives approved two articles of impeachment by which Trump was accused of power abuse and obstruction of Congress. Trump’s impeachment trial was managed by the Democrats who presented the case before the Senate. Adam Schiff, the Head of the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee, led a team of Democrats who laid out the charges detailing how Trump had abused his power. This paper presents a pragmatic analysis of Adam Schiff’s opening and closing arguments at Trump’s impeachment trial, particularly in relation to deixis and vagueness. Our analytical framework includes Levinson’s classifications of person, time, and place deixis, along with those of Huang (2004), Fromkin et al. (2003) and Yule (1996). It also uses two models of vague category markers presented by Evinson, McCarthy, and O’Keeffe (2007) and Sabet and Zhang (2015). The results show that Schiff, in both arguments, employed deictic expressions as a pragmatic device serving the purpose of preciseness and presented vague category markers in a limited way. However, although Schiff’s opening argument depended on addressing reason and using deixis to offer specific facts, it was characterized by repetitive language. His closing argument, on the other hand, appealed to people’s sentiments via the use of deixis followed by emotional descriptions. It is likely that Schiff’s arguments were, to some extent, weakened by his repetitive and exaggerated language, which may have helped Trump’s case. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alkhtanai, M. (2017). Vague language and its social role. Available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f406/1d54fbbcde56b477892f59707aa8d871304a.pdf

Bunt, H. (2000). Dialogue pragmatics and context specification. Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.23.2949

Carron, J. (1992). An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Channell, J. (1994). Vague language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Channell, J. M. (1983). Vague language: Some vague expressions in English. Available at http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/10896/

Crystal, D. (1992). An encyclopedia dictionary of language and languages. London: Blackwell Pub. Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. (6th ed.). Blackwell Publishing.

Dewi, S.E.P. (2013). Deixis analysis in “The Child in the Grave” written by Hans Christian Andersen. Available at https://www.academia.edu/7440961/Deixis_Analysis_in_The_Child_in_the_Grave_written_by_Hans_Christian_Andersen

Diessel, H. (2012). Deixis and demonstratives. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265592153_Deixis_and_Demonstratives

Evinson, J., M. McCarthy, A. O’Keeffe. (2007). ‘Looking out for love and all the rest of it’: Vague category markers as shared social space in J. Cutting (ed.) Vague language explored. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 138–57

Ewata, Thompson O., Bolanle I. Akeredolu-Ale, Babatunde I. Awe. (2023). Understanding English vague expressions as second language learners in African perspectives on the teaching and learning of english in higher education. Routledge: eBook ISBN9781003279433

Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2003). An introduction to language. Massachusetts: Heinle.

Green, K.M.C. (1992). A study of deixis in relation to lyric poetry. Available at http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/1855/1/DX195813.pdf

Hanks, W. F. (1992). The indexical ground of deictic reference. In Rethinking context, language as an interactive phenomenon. (A. D. Goodwin, Ed.) .Cambridge University Press.

Horn, L. R. and Ward, G. (2006). The handbook of pragmatics. Oxford. Blackwell Publishing.

Horn, L. R., and Ward, G. (2004). The handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Huang, Y., 2014. Pragmatics. (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kearns, K. (2000). Semantics. Macmillan Press Ltd.

Kreidler, C.W. (1998). Introducing English semantics. Routledge.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levinson, S. C. (1995). Cognitive anthropology. In handbook of pragmatics online. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Available at https://benjamins.com/online/hop/articles/cog1

Levinson, S. C. (2004). Deixis and pragmatics. In: L. Horn and G. Ward (Eds.). The handbook of pragmatics. Oxford. Blackwell. 97–121.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Malyuga, E. & Mc Carthy, M. (2018). English and Russian vague category markers in business discourse: Linguistic identity aspects. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216618300614Cutting, J. (2007). Vague Language Explored. Palgrave Macmillan.

McNeill, D. (2000). Language and gesture: Window into thought and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mey, J. L. (1994). Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher, Inc.

Overstreet, M. (1999) Whales, candlelight and stuff like that, general extenders in English discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pedria Velasco, Y. (2016). Navigating through time and space: Deixis in Atwood’s “This is a photograph of me.” In GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies (Vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 111–122). Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM Press). https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2016-1602-07Quinto, E.J.M. (2012). Stylistic analysis of deictic expressions in President Benigno Aquino III‘s October 30th Speech. Available at ejournal.ukm.my/3l/article/download/5140/3397.

Ravindran, L., & Amini, M. (2023). The role of technology in enhancing intercultural and pragmatic competencies in EFL class. AJELP: Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 11(2), 60-70. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol11.2.6.2023

Sabet, R.G.P. & Zhang, G.Q. (2015). Communicating through vague language. A comparative study of L1 and L2 speakers. Palgrave Macmillan.

Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-Cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, a division of Walter de Gruyter & Co.

Williams, N. (1992). Deixis: Deixis and indexicals. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332079373_Deixis_Deixis_and_Indexicals

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zhang, G.Q.& Lee, N.N. (2018). Vague language, elasticity theory and the use of “some”. A comparative study of L1 and L2 speakers in educational settings. London & New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-27

How to Cite

Muhammad, M. M. ., Hamed, D. M., Garneshan, S., & Ibrahim, W. M. A. (2025). Pragmatic Analysis of Opening-Closing Arguments at Trump’s Impeachment Trial. AJELP: Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 13(2), 88-105. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol13.2.7.2025