Bridging Gaps with Technology: A Systematic Review of Digital Scaffolding in ESL Classrooms

Authors

  • Afza Diyana Abdullah Pusat Pengajian Ilmu Pendidikan, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11700 Gelugor, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Nurul Ashikin Izhar Pusat Pengajian Ilmu Pendidikan, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11700 Gelugor, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Mohd Ali Samsudin Pusat Pengajian Ilmu Pendidikan, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11700 Gelugor, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/ejoss.vol12.sp.9.2026

Keywords:

digital scaffolding , ESL, systematic literature review, educational technology, blended learning

Abstract

Digital scaffolding has gained increasing attention in English as a Second Language (ESL) education; however, its conceptualisation and implementation remain fragmented. This systematic literature review synthesises empirical research on digital scaffolding in ESL contexts, examining how it is defined, the factors driving its adoption, and how it is implemented across formal educational settings. Guided by PRISMA 2020 protocols, a structured Scopus search identified 214 records published between 2020 and 2025, of which 8 studies met the inclusion criteria after screening. The synthesis reveals persistent conceptual ambiguity: while some studies equate digital scaffolding with technological affordances such as automated feedback or digital prompts, others frame it as adaptive, contingent, and fading support grounded in sociocultural learning theory. Drivers of digital scaffolding are broadly shared but contextually framed, with global studies emphasising enrichment, learner autonomy, and personalization, and Malaysian studies highlighting equity-related constraints such as feedback scarcity, infrastructural challenges, and assessment demands. Implementation spans micro-level tools, meso-level instructional sequences, and macro-level learning ecosystems, yet most interventions remain skill-specific, short-term, and limited in attention to scaffold fading and transfer. Overall, the review demonstrates that digital scaffolding extends beyond technology use and requires pedagogically designed, layered support that is sensitive to learner development and contextual conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ag-Ahmad, N., Mohamed, A. T. F. S., & Majilang, D. B. (2025). Voices from ESL classrooms: Overcoming challenges and enhancing English language teacher education in Malaysia. Studies in English Language and Education, 12(1), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i1.38886

Adickalam, E. R., & Yunus, M. M. (2022). Systematic literature review: Investigating speaking challenges among ESL learners during the COVID-19 pandemic. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(6), 1145–1156. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1206.14

Budianto, L., Prihadi, K. D., Susanto, D., Rohman, A., Kholil, A., & Firdousi, M. A. (2025). Digital media’s role in overcoming anxiety, enhancing linguistic elements and fostering motivation for developing speaking skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(2), 1379–1388. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i2.31931

Chen, R., Ng, B. S., & Paramasivam, S. (2023). Toward the implications of technology-based education and EFL learners’ anxiety for instructions. Language Related Research, 14(3), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.14.3.11

Chuane, Q., Shukor, S. S., Yuehong, T., & Xiaofen, Z. (2023). The relationship between motivation and English language test performance among secondary vocational schools’ students in China. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(1), 280–302. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.25741

Ding, D., & Muhyiddin Yusof, A. (2025). Investigating the role of AI-powered conversation bots in enhancing L2 speaking skills and reducing speaking anxiety: A mixed methods study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05550-z

Hasan, M., & Bidin, S. J. (2023). Scaffolding students’ descriptive writing skills in EFL context: A pedagogical approach. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.903017

Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., & Vedel, I. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291.

https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221

Kernagaran, V., & Abdullah, A. (2022). A systematic literature review of flipped learning in English as a second language (ESL) context. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 793–814. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15243a

Li, D., & Zhao, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence applications for oral communication skills in EFL contexts: A systematic review. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-025-01023-8

Ma, M., Noordin, N., & Razali, A. B. (2022). Effect of educational technology on students’ foreign language anxiety: A thematic literature review. World Journal of English Language, 12(6), 361–369. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n6p361

Ng, M. L., Rahman, Md. M., Rahman, M. H., Lai, T. T., & Tan, R. S.-E. (2025). Exploring obstacles and effectiveness of task-based language teaching (TBLT) approach in EFL speaking instruction: Insights from an adult EFL classroom. World Journal of English Language, 15(6), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n6p151

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Ramalingam, S., Yunus, M. M., & Hashim, H. (2022). Blended learning strategies for sustainable English as a second language education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14(13), Article 8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138051

Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2

Shukor, S. S., Chuane, Q., Albakri, I. S. M. A., Madzlan, N. A., & Gopal, R. (2025). STARTeCH for asynchronous interactive grammar learning: Transforming ESL mastery in Malaysian schools. Studies in English Language and Education, 12(1), 380-397.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050608668639

Wang, J., Abdullah, R., & Leong, L.-M. (2022). Studies of teaching and learning English-speaking skills: A review and bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 880990. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.880990

Wang, N., Ahmad, N. K., & Saharuddin, N. (2025). Effective measures to develop undergraduates’ communicative competence in English as a foreign language: A systematic review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(2), 416–438. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.2.21

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Zhangli, W., Ismail, L., Ahmad, N. K., Mahfoodh, O. H. A., & Xuewen, W. (2024). Effects of blended learning on EFL college students’ oral communicative competence: A critical review of studies. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(5), 1500–1509. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1505.11

Downloads

Published

2026-01-20

How to Cite

Abdullah, A. D., Izhar, N. A., & Samsudin, M. A. (2026). Bridging Gaps with Technology: A Systematic Review of Digital Scaffolding in ESL Classrooms. EDUCATUM Journal of Social Sciences, 12(Special Issue), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.37134/ejoss.vol12.sp.9.2026