Enhancing Student Engagement in Meiosis Learning through an Anime-Based Biology Module: A Theoretical Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/ejoss.vol12.sp2.14.2026Keywords:
Student engagement, Meiosis learning, Anime-based biology module, Constructivist learning, Science educationAbstract
Learning meiosis presents significant challenges for secondary school students due to its abstract nature, microscopic processes and complex sequential stages. Conventional teacher-centered instructional approaches and reliance on static learning materials often limit students’ active involvement, resulting in low levels of engagement in Biology classrooms. Student engagement, encompassing cognitive, emotional and social dimensions, is widely recognized as a critical prerequisite for meaningful learning in science education. In response to these challenges, this article aims to develop a theoretical framework that explains how an anime-based Biology module can be used as an instructional strategy to enhance student engagement in learning meiosis. This study adopts a conceptual research design based on the systematic analysis and synthesis of established learning theories and instructional models relevant to constructivist learning and student engagement. The proposed framework integrates Vygotsky’s Social Constructivist Theory with Needham’s Five-Phase Constructivist Model to operationally explain how anime-based instruction can be implemented through structured instructional phases, namely orientation, elicitation of ideas, restructuring of ideas, application and reflection. Within the framework, anime is conceptualized as a form of visual and narrative scaffolding that supports social interaction, dialogue, and collaborative learning during classroom instruction. The major conceptual findings suggest that the integration of an anime-based Biology module with constructivist instructional principles provides a coherent explanation of how student engagement can be enhanced in meiosis learning. Cognitive engagement is supported through active reasoning and concept reconstruction, emotional engagement is fostered through narrative elements and visual appeal, and social engagement is promoted through peer interaction and guided classroom discourse. These engagement dimensions are theorized to emerge from the interaction between instructional design, visual–narrative scaffolding and socially mediated learning processes. The proposed theoretical framework contributes to the literature by offering a theory-driven explanation of how anime-based instructional approaches can be systematically designed and implemented in Biology education, and it provides practical guidance for educators seeking to develop more interactive and student-centered learning experiences for abstract scientific topics. Future research is recommended to empirically examine the applicability and effectiveness of the framework across diverse educational contexts.
Downloads
References
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Wiley.
Enebechi, R. I. (2023). Effect of peer teaching and discussion methods on senior secondary school students’ academic achievement in biology. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8278581
Faria, C., Valente, B., & Torres, J. (2024). Potentialities of science comics for science communication: Lessons from the classroom. Journal of Science Communication, 23(8). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.23080802
Flemming, D., Cress, U., Brandt, M., & Kimmerle, J. (2018). Emotionalization in science communication: The impact of narratives and visual representations on knowledge gain and risk perception. Frontiers in Communication, 3, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00028
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
Lewis, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance—Do students see any relationship? International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 177–195.
https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289949
Lin, T. J., Deng, F., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2020). The role of situational interest in students’ engagement in science learning through digital media. Computers & Education, 147, 103783.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103783
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Needham, R. (1987). Children’s learning in science project: A constructivist approach to teaching and learning science. University of Leeds.
Rostek, I. (2020). Narratives in STEM education. Education and Environment, 14, 39–48.
https://doi.org/10.35765/EETP.2019.1454.03
Törmänen, T., Ketonen, E., & Lehtoaho, E. (2025). Situational motivation in academic learning: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 37, 56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10036-0
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asmahan Azmi, Salmiza Saleh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


