Teachers’ Implementation of Universal Design for Learning in Inclusive Classrooms: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/ejoss.vol12.sp2.17.2026Keywords:
Universal Design for Learning (UDL), inclusive education, teachers’ training, Systematic Literature Review (SLR)Abstract
This study examines how the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Model helps the implementation of teachers' teaching in inclusive classes through the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach. UDL is a flexible pedagogical framework that emphasizes the three main principles of engagement, representation, and action and expression to ensure that every student has the same access to learning despite their different abilities. This study was conducted using the PRISMA approach to identify, analyse and synthesize empirical evidence from articles obtained through three main databases: Scopus, ERIC and SciSpace. A total of 55 articles were identified, but after the screening and eligibility evaluation process, only 10 articles met the inclusion criteria and were analysed in depth. The findings of the study show that UDL is able to improve the effectiveness of teachers' teaching through increased student involvement, the provision of various learning options, as well as the diversity of teaching designs. However, the implementation of UDL still faces constraints in terms of teacher training, conceptual understanding, and institutional support. The analysis also found a gap between theory and practice, especially in the local context where there is still a lack of UDL-based training modules. Overall, this SLR shows that the success of the implementation of UDL depends not only on the understanding of teachers, but also on the ability of the education system to provide continuous professional support. The implications of the study suggest the development of a contextual teacher training module to strengthen inclusive teaching practices in Malaysia.
Downloads
References
Almeqdad, Q. I., Alodat, A. M., Alquraan, M. F., Mohaidat, M. A., & Al-Makhzoomy, A. K. (2023). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2218191
Cumming, T.M., Rose, M.C. (2022). Exploring universal design for learning as an accessibility tool in higher education: a review of the current literature. Aust. Educ. Res. 49, 1025–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00471-7
De Cassai, A., Dost, B., Tulgar, S., & Boscolo, A. (2025). Methodological Standards for Conducting High-Quality Systematic Reviews. Biology, 14(8), 973. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14080973
Fiona Mitchell (2023). Promoting inclusive practice for autistic learners: Universal design for learning. Kairaranga,24(2),30-51.
https://doi.org/10.54322/j7wy5s57
Han, C., & Lei, J. (2024). Teachers’ and Students’ Beliefs Towards Universal Design for Learning Framework: A Scoping Review. Sage Open, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241272032
Jalaluddin, N. S., & Tahar, M. M. (2022). Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Inklusif dalam kalangan Guru Arus Perdana. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(2), e001280. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i2.1280
Kementerian Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat. (2007). National Policy for Persons with Disabilities 2007. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Kerajaan Malaysia.
Lambert R, McNiff A, Schuck R, Imm K and Zimmerman S (2023) “UDL is a way of thinking”; theorizing UDL teacher knowledge, beliefs, and practices. Front. Educ. 8:1145293. https://doi.org /10.3389/feduc.2023.1145293
Matthew. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. https://guides.lib.unc.edu/systematic-reviews/PRISMA
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and Practice. CAST.
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
Pfeifer MA, Reiter EM, Cordero JJ, Stanton JD. (2021). Inside and Out: Factors That Support and Hinder the Self-Advocacy of Undergraduates with ADHD and/or Specific Learning Disabilities in STEM. CBE Life Sci Educ. 20(2):ar17. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-06-0107
Saini, R., Shukri Nordin, Z., Hashim, M. H., & Abol, M. T. (2024). Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to Facilitate the Learning of Students with Intellectual Disabilities within the Inclusive Educational Context in Sarawak, East Malaysia. International Journal of Special Education, 39(2), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.37300/ijse.2024.392.02
Shaheen, N. (2023). Appraising systematic reviews: A comprehensive guide to improve reliability and reduce bias. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1268045
Singh, S. (2024). Inclusive Education: Promoting Equity and Access for Students with Disabilities. Global International Research Thoughts, 12(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.36676/girt.v12.i1.109
Sulaiman, L. H., & Tahar, M. M. (2024). Implementation of universal learning design principles by mainstream teacher in inclusive education programs. Special Education [SE], 2(1), e0015. https://doi.org/10.1002/SE.0015
Twum, F. (2025). Navigating Inclusion through Universal Design for Learning: Insights from a Ghanaian Special School. East African Journal of Education Studies, 8(2), 971-985. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.8.2.3242
Thomas, E. R., Lembke, E. S., & Gandhi, A. G. (2023). Universal Design for Learning within an Integrated Multitiered System of Support. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 38(1), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12302
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nor Halimaton Kamarudin, Kama Shaffeei

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


