Analisis Hubungan antara Sikap dan Minat Guru Pelatih Kimia dengan Pencapaian dalam Kimia Organik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol16.1.4.2026Keywords:
Kimia Organik, Pencapaian akademik, Sikap pelajar, pendidikan kimiaAbstract
Kimia organik sering dianggap sebagai subjek yang sukar dan mencabar untuk dikuasai. Kajian ini bertujuan mengkaji hubungan antara sikap dan minat guru pelatih kimia dengan pencapaian dalam kursus Kimia Organik I dan Kimia Organik II di Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI). Tinjauan korelasi ini melibatkan 123 guru pelatih kimia semester lima dan tujuh. Data dikumpul menggunakan soal selidik yang mengukur sikap dan minat terhadap Kimia Organik. Analisis deskriptif menunjukkan pelajar mempunyai sikap positif (min=4.01, SP=0.90) dan minat yang tinggi (min=3.95; SP=0.95) terhadap kursus ini. Namun, korelasi Spearman-rho menunjukkan hubungan yang sangat lemah dan tidak signifikan antara sikap dan pencapaian Kimia Organik I (rs=0.148, p>0.05) serta Kimia Organik II (rs=0.001, p>0.05). Manakala, hubungan antara minat dan pencapaian dalam Kimia Organik I (rs=0.098, p>0.05) dan Kimia Organik II (rs=0.006, p>0.05) juga tidak signifikan. Dapatan ini menunjukkan bahawa walaupun pelajar mempunyai kecenderungan afektif yang tinggi terhadap Kimia Organik, faktor tersebut tidak memberi kesan langsung kepada pencapaian akademik. Kajian ini boleh dijadikan rujukan kepada pensyarah untuk membentuk pendekatan pengajaran yang sesuai untuk memberi pengalaman pembelajaran dan pencapaian akademik yang lebih baik.
Organic chemistry is often considered a difficult and challenging subject to master. This study aimed to examine the relationship between the attitude and interest of chemistry trainee teachers and the achievements in the Organic Chemistry I and Organic Chemistry II courses at Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI). This correlation review involved 123 chemistry trainer teachers in the fifth and seventh semesters. Data was collected using questionnaires that measured attitudes and interest in Organic Chemistry. Descriptive analysis showed that students had a positive attitude (mean=4.01, SP=0.90) and high interest (mean=3.95; SP=0.95) against this course. However, the Spearman-rho correlation showed a very weak and insignificant relationship between attitudes and achievements in Organic Chemistry I (rs=0.148, p>0.05) and Organic Chemistry II (rs=0.001, p>0.05). Meanwhile, the relationship between interest and achievement in Organic Chemistry I (rs=0.098, p>0.05) and Organic Chemistry II (rs =0.006, p>0.05) was also not significant. These findings show that although students have a high affective predisposition to Organic Chemistry, the factor does not have a direct impact on academic achievement. This study can be used as a reference for lecturers to form appropriate teaching approaches to provide better learning experiences and academic achievements.
Keyword: Organic Chemistry, academic achievements, students’ attitude, interest in organic chemistry, chemistry education
Downloads
References
Abdul Khalil, A., Mohamed, S. S. B. P., Hassan, H., & Ibrahim, A. (2021). Pelaksanaan Community Based Learning (CBL) dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran bagi Kursus Khidmat Masyarakat di Institusi Pengajian Tinggi. International Jurnal of Education, Psychology and Counselling, 6(40), 145-159
Abdul Rahman, S., & Abdul Manaf, N. F. (2017). A Critical Analysis of Bloom’s Taxonomy in Teaching Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Malaysia through English Literature. English Language Teaching, 10(9), 245-256. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n9p245
Agarwal, P. K. (2019). Retrieval Practice & Bloom’s Taxonomy: Do Students Need fact Knowledge Before Higher Order Learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 189-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000282.supp
Almanasreh, E., Moles, R., & Chen, T. F. (2019). Evaluation of Methods used for Estimating Content Validity. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(2), 214-221.
Alonzi-Gold, D., & Grajo, L. C. (2021). The Content Validity and Clinical Utility of the Kindergarten Readiness Inventory (K-READI): A Screening Tool of School Readiness for Children on the Autism Spectrum. Journal of Occuoational Theraphy, Schools, and Early Intervention, 14(1), 75-89.
Amatan, M. A., Han, C. G. K., & Pang, V. (2021). Kesahan Kandungan Soal Selidik Faktor Konteks, Input dan Proses Terhadap Penerimaan Pelaksanaan Elemen Pendidikan STEM dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Guru Menggunakan Nisbah Kesahan Kandungan (CVR). International Journal of Advanced Research in Future Ready Learning and Education, 23(1), 10-22. https://akademiabaru.com/submit/index.php/frle/article/view/3923
Anizar, Gani, A., Khaldun, I., & Bahi, M. (2018). The Development of a Module with Microsoft Excel-Based Interactive Media on the Topic of Buffer Solution. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012119
Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio: Revisiting the Original Methods of Calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47, 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
Baco, S. & Ishak, M. Z. (2021). Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Instrumen Penilaian Kendiri Pembelajaran Ungkapan Algebra Tingkatan Dua. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(11), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i11.1136
Ballantyne, J., Flynn, L., & Olm-Madden, T. (2020). Problem-Seeking in Teacher Education: Empowering Students to Grapple with The Complexities of The Profession. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(5), 38-61. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n5.3
Barton, G. M., Baguley, M., Kerby, M., & MacDonald, A. (2020). Investigating the Assessment Practices within an Initial Teacher Education Program in an Australian University: Staff Perceptions and Practices. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3), 34-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n3.3
Billiot, T. (2023). Continuous Learning and Advancing Technologies: A Framework for professional Development and Training in Artificial Intelligence. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 37(3), 29-31.
Boynton, P. M., & Greenhalgh, T. (2004). Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. Education and debate, 328, 1312-1315.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge
Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (6th ed.). Pearson.
Dabney, B., & Eid, F. (2024). Comparing educational frameworks: unpacking differences between fink's and bloom's taxonomies in nursing education. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2024.05.012.
Darusalam, G. & Hussin, S. (2021). Metodologi Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan: Amalan dan Analisis Kajian. Penerbit Universiti Malaya
DeLuca, C., Searle, M., Carbone, K., Ge, J., & LaPointe-McEwan, D. (2021). Toward a Pedagogy for Slow and Significant Learning about Assessment in Teacher Education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103316
Denscombe, M. (2010). The Good Research Guide for Small-scale Social Research Projects (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale Development Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publication Inc.
Downing, M., Canan, C., Jewell, T., & Kang, D. (2024). Student Achievement of Course Learning Goals in an Asynchronous Distance Learning Course Redesigned using Fink's Taxonomy of Significant Learning. Online Learning. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i4.3934.
Dunagan, P. (2024). A comparison of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing's basic principles and benefits of competency-based nursing education and Fink's taxonomy. Journal of Professional Nursing: Official Journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 55, 140-145 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.09.008.
Edris, A., Amat S., Mahmud, M. I., Abu Bakar, A. Y., Ghazali, N. M., Anuar, A. (2019). Split-Half Analysis: Measurement of Validity and Reliability of the Career Counselling Self-Efficacy Scale (CCSES) in Malaysian Public Universities. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 7(7), 1-15. http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/27924
Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating Significant Learning Experiences, Revised and Updated: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. Jossey-Bass A Wiley Brand
Foo, C. H., & Mohd Yaini, M. F. A. (2025). Pembangunan dan penilaian Roda Algebra untuk pengajaran Ungkapan Algebra dalam tingkatan satu. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 15(2), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol15.2.4.2025
Ganesha, H. R, & Aithal, P. S. (2022). How to Choose an Appropriate Research Data Collection Method and Method Choices during Ph.D. Program in India?. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 7(2), 455-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/ssrn.4275696
Hennick, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Jekri, A., & Han, C. G. K. (2019). Pembinaan dan Pengesahan Instrumen Pengetahuan, Afektif, dan Motivasi Guru Sains terhadap Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran STEM (PAMPDPSTEM). International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4(32), 79-89.
Kamaluddin, M. R., Nasir, R., Wan Sulaiman, W. S., Khairudin, R., & Zamani, Z. A. (2017). Validity and Psychometric Properties of Malay Translated Religious Orientation Scale-Revised among Malaysian Adult Samples. Akademika, 87(2), 133-144
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 (Pendidikan Prasekolah hingga Lepas Menengah). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Dasar Pendidikan Kebangsaan (Edisi Keempat). Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran: Sains Tingkatan 4 dan 5. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2022). Unit Pelaksanaan dan Prestasi Pendidikan (PADU) Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025: Laporan Tahunan 2022. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia
Latifah, I. U. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika Berbasis Taksonomi Fink. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Surabaya.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575.
Lemov, D. (2017, Mar 4). Bloom’s Taxonomy – That Pyramid is a Problem. https://teachlikeachampion.org/blog/blooms-taxonomy-pyramid-problem/
Levine, L. E., Fallahi, C. R., Nicoll-Senft, J. M., Tessier, J. T., Watson, C. L., & Wood, R. M. (2008). Creating Significant Learning Experiences Across Disciplines. College Teaching, 56(4), 247-254. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.56.4.247-254
Long, N. L., & Mustapha, R. (2019). Analisis Taksonomi Bloom dalam Penilaian Vokasional: Pembangunan suatu Taksonomi Baharu Menggunakan Teknik Delphi. Jurnal Pengukuran Kualiti dan Analisis, 15(1), 65-75.
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and Quantification of Content Validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-386.
Malone, K. L., Boone, W.J., Stammen, A., Schuchardt, A., Ding, L. & Sabree, Z. (2021). Construction and Evaluation of an Instrument to Measure High School Students Biological Content Knowledge. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11376
Masrom, N. W., Hashim, M., Hashim, N., & Behak, F. P. (2018). Kedudukan Taksonomi Bloom Menurut Perspektif Islam. Journal of Quran Sunnah Education and Special Needs, 1(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.33102/jqss.vol2no1.8
Md Nawi, N. H. (2021). Pembinaan Taksonomi Kerohanian; Inisiatif Awalan. Tinta Artikulasi Membina Ummah, 7(2), 12-23. http://www.journaltamu.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/TAMU-Vol-72-December-2021-12-23.pdf
Miller, L. A. & Lovler, R. L. (2020). Foundations of Psychological Testing: A Practical Approach (6th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Mohamad Fauzi, S. W., Wan Salleh, W. M. N. H., & Mustafa, Z. (2025). Pembangunan permainan Chemschooly bagi Topik Formula dan Persamaan Kimia serta kajian persepsi terhadap pelajar tingkatan 4. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 15(2), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol15.2.5.2025
Mohamat, R., Sumintono, B., & Abd Hamid, H. S. (2022). Analisis Kesahan Kandungan Instrumen Kompetensi Guru untuk Melaksanakan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah menggunakan Model Rasch pelbagai Faset. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 47(1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JPEN-2022-47.01-01
Mohd Matore, M. E. E., & Khairani, A. Z. (2015). Assesing the Content Validity of IKBAR using Content Validiy Ratio. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(7), 255-257.
Mohd Matore, M. E. E., Idris, H., Abdul Rahman, N., & Khairani, A. Z. (2017). Kesahan Kandungan Pakar Instrumen IKBAR bagi Pengukuran AQ Menggunakan Nisbah Kesahan Kandungan. Proceeding of International Conference on Global Education V (ICGE V), (May), 979-997.
Nasab, M. F., Abdul Kadir, R., Hassan, S. A., & Mohd Noah, S. (2015). Psychometric Evaluation of the Career Decision Scale with Iranian Undergraduate Students. Journal of Counselling & Development, 93(3), 344-351.
Oluwatayo, J. A. (2012). Validity and Reliability Issues in Educational Research. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(2), 391-400. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2012.v2n2.391
Omar, A., Hamzah, S. A., & Kee, C. P. (2021). Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Instrumen Batas Etnik di Sekolah Kebangsaan Zon Utara Semenanjung Malaysia, Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, 18(3), 253-269
Partido, B. B., Chartier, E., & Jewell, J. (2020). Evaluation of an e-Book Assignment using Fink’s Taxonomy of Significant Learning Among Undergraduate Dental Hygiene Students. Journal of Dental EducationI, 84(10), 1074-1083. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12247
Payan-Carreira, R., Sacau-Fontenia, A., Rebelo, H., Sebastiao, L., & Pnevmatikos, D. (2022). Development and Validation of a Critical Thinking Assessment-Scale Short Form. Education Science, 12, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120938
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Focus on Research Methods: Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
Raifman, S., DeVost, M. A., Digitale, J. C., Chen, Y. H., & Morris, M. D. (2022). Respondent-Driven Sampling: A Sampling Method for Hard-to-Reach Populations and Beyond. Current Epidemiology Reports, (9), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-022-00287-8
Ramli, N. F., Talib, O., Hassan, S. A., & Abdul Manaf, U. K. (2020). Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure STEM Teachers’ Instructional Preparedness. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.11084
Rodrigues, I. B., Adachi, J. D, Beattie, K. A., & MacDermid, J. C. (2017). Development and Validation of a New Tool to Measure the Facilitators, Barriers and Preferences to Exercise in People with Osteoporosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 28(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5
Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Method for Bussiness: A Skill Building Approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Su, C. (2022). Incorporating Fink’s Integrated Model to Developing Writing Courses in College. International Journal of English Language Teaching , 10(6), 8-18.
Suwono, H., Maulidia, L., Saefi, M., Kusairi, S., & Yuenyong, C. (2022). The Development and Validation of an Instrument of Prospective Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Scientific Literacy. Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), 1-16.
Taherdoost, H. (2022). Designing a Questionnaire for a Research Paper: A Comprehensive Guide to Design and Develop an Effective Questionnaire. Asian Journal of Managerial Science, 11(1), 8-16. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajms-2022.11.1.3087
Ullah, Z., Lajis, A., Jamjoom, M., Altalhi, A., & Saleem, F. (2020). Bloom’s taxonomy: A beneficial tool for learning and assessing students’ competency levels in computer programming using empirical analysis. Computer Application in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1-13.
Uribe Cantalejo, J. C., & Pardo, M. I. (2020). Fink’s Integrated Course Design and Taxonomy: The Impact of their Use in a “Basics of Dental Anatomy” Course. Journal of Dental Education, 84(9), 964-973. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12183
Viterbo, L. M. F., Dinis, M. A. P., Costa, A. S., & Vidal, D. G. (2019). Development and Validation of an Interdisciplinary Worker’s Health Approach Instrument (IWHAI). International Journal of Environment Research and Public Health, 16, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152803
Wang, J. Liu, Y., Li, P., Lin, Z., Sindakis, S., & Aggarwal, S. (2022). Overview of Data Quality: Examining the Dimensions, Antecedents, and Impacts of Data Quality. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1, 1-20.
Yaghmaie, F. (2003). Content validity and its estimation. Journal of Medical Education, 3(1), 25-27.
Yaw, P. W., & Mohd Matore, M. E. E. (2023). How to Create Amazing Teacher Competency in Fink’s Taxonomy in Science Subjects? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(3), 1320-1333. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i3/16556
Zainal, M. A., Mohd Matore, M. E. E., Musa, W. N. W., & Hashim, N. H. (2020). Kesahan Kandungan Instrumen Pengukuran Tingkah Laku Inovatif Guru Menggunakan Kaedah Nisbah Kesahan Kandungan (CVR). Akademika, 90, 43-54. https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2020-90IK3-04
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurul Aqilah Mohamed Sayuti, Nurulsaidah Abdul Rahim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
