The effectiveness of using the Model Polya in improving mathematical reasoning skills

Authors

  • Karthikesan Manikabasagan SJKT Ladang Soon Lee, 34300 Bagan Serai, Perak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol14.2.6.2024

Keywords:

reasoning skills, Model Polya, mathematical reasoning

Abstract

This research was conducted to examine the use of the Model Polya in solving non-routines helps in improving mathematical reasoning skills on 16 students of a Year 5 class from a school in Kerian district. Focused action to improve reasoning skills in mathematics in this study was completed within four weeks. The Model Polya in solving non-routine problems is a student-centered learning method in which students were given problems to be solved through the model. Methods of data collection used were the pre ad post tests, observations, students’ work sheets and interviews. Data collected were analysed qualitatively. The result of data analysis showed that the use of the Model Polya in solving non-routine problems improved students’ proficiency in mathematics reasoning skills. There were two aspects that influenced the improvement in the students’ reasoning skills: orderly process, and representations. The proposed follow-up to this research is the use of interactive powerpoints in solving non-routine problems using the model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu Hassan, Mohd Eizuan and Saad, Noor Shah and Dollah, Mohd Uzi (2012) .Kemahiran Penaakulan Saintifik (Kps) Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Dan Hubungannya Dengan Stail Pengajaran Guru Matematik Di Bilik Darjah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 2 (2). pp. 1-10. ISSN 2232-0393

Bahar, A., & Maker, C. J. (2015). Cognitive Backgrounds of Problem Solving: A Comparison of Open-ended vs. Closed Mathematics Problems. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1531–1546.

Boesen, J., Lithner, J., & Palm, T. (2010). The relation between types of assessment tasks and the mathematical reasoning students use. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 89–105

Brodie, K . 2010 . Teaching mathematical reasoning in secondary schools. New York: Springer.

BSNP. (2006). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, 1–23.

Cheng, S. C., She, H. C., & Huang, L. U. (2018). The Impact of Problem-Solving Instruction on Middle School Students’ Physical Science Learning: Interplays of Knowledge, Reasoning, and Problem Solving. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(3), 731-743. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80902

Codina A, Cañadas MC, Castro E (2015). Mathematical problem solving through sequential process analysis. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 13(1):73-76.

Dindyal, J. (2006). The Singaporean mathematics curriculum: Connections to TIMSS. In Grootenboer, P., Zevenbergen, R., & Chinnappan, M. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 179-186). Adelaide: MERGA Inc. Educational and Educational Research, 3(2), 102-112.

Ersoy, E., & Guner, P. (2014). Mathematics teaching and mathematical thinking. Journal of Facione, P. A. & Gittens, C. A. (2013). THINK critically. (2nd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson Education / prentice Hall.

Furley, P., & Memmert, D. (2015). Creativity and working memory capacity in sports: working memory capacity is not a limiting factor in creative decision making amongst skilled performers. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 115. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00115

Goh, T. (2014). Students’ Achievement, Skill and Confidence in Using Stepwise Problem Solving Strategies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(6), 617-624. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1223a

Griffin, P., Care, E., & McGaw, B. (2012) The Changing Role of Education and Schools. In Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. (Eds) P. Griffin, B. McGaw & E. Care. Springer. Dordrecht.

Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). The Changing Role of Education and Schools. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 1-16). Dordrecht, Germany: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2

Katminingsih Y and Widodo S 2015 Pengaruh model pembelajaran berdasarkan masalah terhadap Kediri Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa ditinjau menurut gender siswa SD Negeri Tarokan

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Komariyah, K. (2011). Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Problem Solving Model Polya untuk meningkatkan Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah bagi Siswa Kelas IX di SMPN 13 Cimahi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA. Fakultas MIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11064766.pdf

Kusumah, Y. S., & Nevt, Y. V. (2014). E-71 Enhancing Student’s Mathematical Reasoning by Algebrator-Assisted Inquiry Method. International Seminar on Innovation in Mathematics and Mathematics Education 1st ISIM-MED.

Lee, Y. C., & Chen, M. J. (2015). Effects of Polya Questioning Instruction for Geometry Reasoning in Junior High School. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1547-1561. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1419a

Lesseig, K., Casey, S., Monson, D., Krupa, E. E., & Huey, M. (2016). Developing an interview module to support secondary noticing of student thinking. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 5(1), 29-46.

Marzano, R., & Kendall, J. (2008). Designing & assessing educational objectives: Applying the new taxonomy. Corwin Press.

Marzano, R., & Kendall, J. (2008). Designing and assessing educational objectives: Applying the

Marzano, R., & Kendall, J. (2008). Designing and assessing educational objectives: Applying the

Marzano, R., & Kendall, J. (2008). Designing and assessing educational objectives: Applying the

Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking mathematically. Pearson Education.

Minarni, A., & Napitupulu, E. E. (2017). Developing Instruction Materials Based on Joyful PBL to Improve Students Mathematical Representation Ability. International Education Studies, 10, 23-34.

Misnanti, Utami, R. W., & Suwanto, F. R. (2017). Problem Based Learning to Improve Proportional Reasoning of Students in Mathematics Learning. AIP Conference Proceedings 1868, 1-8.

Mohini, M., & Johnny, J. (2013). Difficulties in Number Sense. In Selected Issues in Science and Mathematics Education Part 2. Johor Bahru: UTM Press.

Muin, A., Hanafiah, S. H., & Dwidian, F. (2018). The Effect of Creative Problem Solving on Students’ Mathematical Adaptive Reasoning. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 948, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012001

Mulils, I. V. S. (2015). Chapter 1 TIMSS 2015 Mathematics Framework. TIMSS 2015 Assessment Frameworks. Martin MO Boston College: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. MA, USA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

new taxonomy. Corwin Pres

new taxonomy. Corwin Pres

new taxonomy. Corwin Pres

Nidya, Wulandari, F. & Jailani. (2015). Indonesian Students’ Mathematics Problem Solving Skill in PISA And TIMSS. Proceeding of International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Sciences 2015 (ICRIEMS 2015), Yogyakarta State University, 17-19 May 2015.

OECD 2016 Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills - The PISA 2016 (Paris: OECD)

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2014). PISA 2012 Results. What Students Know and Can Do-Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science, Vol 1.

Pahrudin, A., Ahid, N., Huda, S., Ardianti, N., Putra, F. G., Anggoro, B. S., & Joemsittiprasert, W. (2020). The effects of the ECIRR learning model on mathematical reasoning ability in the curriculum perspective 2013: Integration on student learning motivation. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 675-684. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.675

Pendidikan Matematika 1 77-89

Polya M (1957). How to solve it (2nd Ed.). New York: Doubleday.

Polya, G. (1973). How To Solve It. New Jersey. Princeton.

Saragih, S., & Napitupulu, E. (2015). Developing Student-Centered Learning Model to Improve High Order Mathematical Thinking Ability. International Education Studies, 8(6), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n6p104

Schoenfeld A (1987). Pólya, Problem Solving, and Education. Mathematics Magazine 60:5.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). Noticing matters. A lot. Now what? In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through the teachers' eyes (pp. 223–238). Routledge.

Selvianti., Ramdani., & Jusniar. (2013). Efektivitas Metode Pemecahan Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Keterampilan Generik Sains Siswa Kelas XI IA 2 SMA Negeri 8 Makassar (Studi Pada Materi Pokok Hidrolisis Garam). Jurnal Chemica, 14(1), 55-65. Retrieved from http://download.portalgaruda.org/article.php?article=150249&val=4338

Simamora, R. E., Sidabutar, D. R., & Surya, E. (2017). Improving Learning Activity and Students’ Problem Solving Skill through Problem Based Learning (PBL) In Junior High School. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 33(2), 321–331.

Simamora, S. J., Simamora, R. E., & Sinaga, B. (2017). Application of Problem Based Learning to Increase Students’ Problem Solving Ability on Geometry in Class X SMA Negeri 1 Pagaran. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 36(2), 234–251.

Switala, M. S. (2013). Enacting Reasoning and Proving in Secondary Mathematics Classrooms Through Tasks. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

Tambunan, H. (2019). The Effectiveness of the Problem Solving Strategy and the Scientific Approach to Students’ Mathematical Capabilities in High Order Thinking Skills. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5715

Varatharaju, S., & Bahurudin Setambah, M. A. (2023). Perlaksanaan Kbat Dengan Penggunaan Kaedah Jadual Dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Matematik Tahun Empat: Implementation of HOTS Using The Table Method in Year Four Mathematical Problems.Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia,13(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol13.1.3.2023

Wahyuni, E. S., Susanto., & Hadi, A. F. (2019). Profile of the Student’s Mathematical Reasoning Ability in Solving Geometry Problem. J. Phys. Conference, 1211(1).

Widodo S A 2015 Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif – Inovatif 6 2 pp 142-151

Zaipul Bahari, F. A., & Saleh, S. (2023). Content Validation Procedure: Development of Problem-solving Skills Test (PSST): Prosedur Pengesahan Kandungan: Pembangunan Ujian Kemahiran Penyelesaian Masalah (PSST).Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia,13(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol13.1.1.2023

Zulyadaini. (2017). Effects of Creative Problem Solving Learning Model on Mathematical Problem Solving Skills of Senior High School Students. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 7(3), Ver. III, 33-37. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0703033337

Downloads

Published

2024-09-04

How to Cite

Manikabasagan, K. (2024). The effectiveness of using the Model Polya in improving mathematical reasoning skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 14(2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol14.2.6.2024