Professional learning community: A pilot study

  • Mohd Aizat Abu Hassan Sk Batu Muda, Sentul, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Kamarudin Musa Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia
  • Nur Raihan Mohd Yusof Smart Reader Worldwide, Kualu Lumpur, Malaysia
Keywords: Validity, Reliability, Instrument, Questionnaire, Profesional Learning Community

Abstract

This pilot study was conducted to test the reliability of the Professional Learning Community questionnaire which involved eight dimensions, namely norms and joint vision, commitment and support of school principal, structural support, mutual understanding and beliefs, collaborative learning, reflective dialogue, collective inquiry and external support. The design of this study is a quantitative study using SPSS to test the reliability of the instrument by using Cronbach Alpha. A total of 100 respondents were involved with this study to answer the questionnaire. This questionnaire has 63 items and uses the Likert scale. Each item has six answer options namely the scale of the Likert scale from scale one which shows the respondents strongly disagree with the item's statement to scale six which shows the respondents strongly agree with the item's statement as stated in the questionnaire. Overall Alpha Cronbach Value for Professional Learning Community instrument with eight dimensions is between 0.82 to 0.93. 

References

Amin Senin. (2008). Pembangunan Professional Guru. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.

Aziah Ismail, Loh Hooi Yen & Abdul Ghani Kanesan Abdullah. (2015). Komuniti pembelajaran profesional dan efikasi kendiri guru sekolah menengah di Pulau Pinang. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, Bil.2, No. 1, 2015

Barton, P. E. (2004). Why does the gap persist? Educational Leadership, 62(3), 8-13.

Botha, E. M. (2012). Turning the tide: Creating professional learning communities (PLC) to improve teaching practice and learning in South African public schools. Africa Education Review, 9(2), 395-411.

Chua. Y. P. (2006). Asas Statistik Penyelidikan. Selangor: Mc Graw Hill Education.

Creswell, J.W. (2104). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approach. Ed ke-3. London: Sage Publication, 2013.

Creswell, J.W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters?. Educational Leadership, 46 - 53.

Darusalam, G. bin, & Hussin, S. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: amalan dan analisis kajian. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

DeVellis, R.F. 2003. Scale Development Theory and Applications. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications

Dufour, R. & Marzano, R. (2011). Leaders of learning: How district, school, and classroom leadership prove student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.

DuFour, R. (2014). Harnessing the power of PLCs. Educational Leadership, 71(8), 30-35.

DuFour, R., & Fullan, M. (2013). Cultures built to last systemic PLCs at work. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.

Eaton, L. B. (2015). The 5 habits of effective PLC’s. Journal of Staff Development, 36(6), 24-34.

Garmston, R. J., & Wellman, B. M. (1999). The adaptive school: A sourcebook for developing collaborative groups. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.

Graham, P., & Ferriter, W. (2010). Building a professional learning community at work: A guide to the first year. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

Hord, S.M. & Sommers, W.A. (2008). Leading professional learning communities: Voices from research and practice. Thousands Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. doi: 10.9734/bjast/2015/14975

Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 203-235.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025: Pendidikan prasekolah hingga lepas menengah. Putrajaya, Malaysia.

Lippy, D., & Zamora, E. (2012). Implementing effective professional learning communities at the middle school level. National Forum of Educational Administration & Supervision Journal, 29(3), 51-72.

Lynn, L. (1995-96,Winter). Successful school restructuring involves four components. WCER Highlights, 7(3),4-5, 8. Madison,WI: Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

McLaughlin, M.W. & Talbert, J.E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning. Stanford: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching, Stanford University.

McMillan, J. H. (2012). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer. Boston: Pearson.

Nadelson, L. S., Louis, S., Seifert, A. L., Hettinger, J. K., & Coats, B. (2013). Where they go for help: Teachers’ pedagogical and content support seeking practices and preferences. Teacher Education & Practice, 26(1), 82-98.

Popp, J.S. & Goldman, S.R. (2016) Knowledge building in teacher professional learning communities: Focus of meeting matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 347-359.

Rosenholtz, S. (1989). Teacher’s workplace:The social organization of schools. New York: Longman.

Tai, M.K., Omar, A.K. and Ghouri, A.M. (2018) Developing a preliminary model on professional learning community in Malaysian secondary school Unpublished research report which was funded by Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [Code: 2017-0196-107-01], Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia). Sultan Idris Education University, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia.

Tam, A. C. (2014). The role of a professional learning community in teacher change: A perspective from beliefs and practices. Teachers and Teaching, 21(1), 22-43. doi:10.1080/13540602.2014.928122

Vangrieken K, Meredith C, Packer T and Kyndt E (2017) Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education 61: 47–59.

Wald, J., P., Ed, Castleberry, S., M., & Ed. (1999, November 30). Educators as Learners: Creating a Professional Learning Community in Your School. Diambil daripada https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED439099

Zuraidah Abdullah, Zulkifli A Manaf, Nik Mustafa Mat Ail & Mohammad Ismath Ramzy. (2017). Pemerkasaan guru bahasa melayu melalui penyeliaan kembang tumbuh dan komuniti pembelajaran profesional (KPP) di lima sekolah menengah daerah Kuala Lipis. JuPiDi: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 42-59.

Zuraidah Abdullah. (2009). Pembentukan komuniti pembelajaran profesional: Kajian terhadap sekolah menengah di Malaysia, Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan.
Published
2019-11-26
How to Cite
Abu Hassan, M. A., Musa, K., & Mohd Yusof, N. R. (2019). Professional learning community: A pilot study. Management Research Journal, 8, 19-29. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/MRJ/article/view/2738