Tahap profesionalisme guru sekolah kebangsaan di Semenanjung Malaysia

  • Mohd Aizat Abu Hassan Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Kamarudin Musa Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
Keywords: Guru Sekolah Rendah, Semenanjung Malaysia, Profesionalisme Guru

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti tahap profesionalisme guru berdasarkan empat dimensi iaitu watak guru, komitmen untuk berubah dan peningkatan berterusan, pengetahuan subjek dan pedagogi, dan kewajipan dan hubungan kerja di luar kelas di sekolah rendah di semenanjung Malaysia. Responden kajian terdiri daripada 384 guru sekolah yang dipilih secara rawak. Untuk mendapatkan data, borang soal selidik digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data daripada guru di Semenanjung Malaysia. Data akan dianalisis bagi mendapatkan min bagi setiap item untuk di interpretasi sama ada rendah, sederhana atau tinggi. Dapatan kajian secara keseluruhan menunjukkan bahawa tahap amalan profesionalisme guru adalah tinggi. Kajian ini dapat membantu pihak yang berkaitan untuk melihat tahap profesionalisme di kalangan guru di Semenanjung Malaysia.

References

Abu Hassan, M. A., Rabbani, M. F., Mohamad Shukor, M. E., & Abdul Majid, M. M. (2018). Sikap Guru Terhadap Perubahan dalam Sekolah di Malaysia. Management Research Journal, 7, 188 - 196. Retrieved from
http://202.45.132.61/index.php/MRJ/article/view/1479

Amir Hasan Dawi. (2009). Sekolah dan masyarakat. Tanjong Malim: Quantum Books.

Ary, D., Jacobs. L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (8th ed). California: Wadsworth.

Bahagian Pendidikan Guru (BPG). (2009). Standard Guru Malaysia. Putrajaya : Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.

Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., Perry, N. E., & Martin, A. J. (2016). Teachers’ psychological functioning in the workplace: Exploring the roles of contextual beliefs, need satisfaction, and personal characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(6), 788–799.
doi: 10.1037/edu0000088

Dalli, C., & Urban, M. (2013). Introduction In C. Dalli & M. Urban (Eds.), Professionalism in Early Childhood education and care: International Perspectives (pp. 1-4). London UK: Taylor & Francis.

Evans, L. (2008). Professionals, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20-38

Ghazali Darusalam, & Sufean Hussin. (2016). Metodologi Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan: Amalan dan Analisis Kajian (Kedua). Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

Hasan Tanang. (2015). Teacher Professionalism and Professional Development Practices in South Sulawesi Indonesia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia.

Johns, R. (2005). One size doesn’t fit all: Selecting response scales for attitude items. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 15, 237-264.
doi: 10.1080/13689880500178849

Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities Robert. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38(1), 607–610.
http://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Mabagala, S. (2013). Professional Ethics in Education: Teachers Knowledge, Compliance and Ethical Dilemmas. Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.

Nadia Farhana. (2008). Persepsi Pentadbir Sekolah terhadap Kualiti Guru Pelatih UTM di Sekolah Sekitar Johor Bahru. (Tesis Sarjana Muda, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia).

Nardi, Peter. M. (2018). Doing Survey Research: a guide to quantitative methods. Oxfordshire: Routledge.

Nur Hafizoh Idris & Rohana Hamzah. (2012). Nilai Profesionalisme Bakal Guru Berteraskan Indikator Standard Guru Malaysia (SGM). Jurnal Teknologi, 31-37.

O’Brien, S. (2016). A journey inside education: four roads to raise a scholar. Abingdon: Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business.

O’Sullivan, H. & West-Burnham, J. (2011) Leading and Managing Schools. London: Sage

Parr, G. (2004). Teacher professionalism: Pessimism and/or possibilities. In Proceedings of the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) Conference. Melbourne: AARE.

Robiah Sidin. (2002). Konsep guru professional. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Profesion Perguruan. Bangi: Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Samruhaizad Samian @ Samion & Azahan Awang. (2017). Pendidikan Sebagai Komponen Kualiti Hidup Masyarakat Pinggir Bandar. Asian Journal of Environment, History and Heritage, 1(1), 267-280.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
doi: 10.3102/0013189x015002004

Syed Najmuddin Syed Hassan, Ab. Halim Tamuri, Isahak Othaman & Mohd. Sabri Mamat, (2009) Kajian persepsi pelajar terhadap tahap profesionalisme guru Pendidikan Islam MRSM. JIAE: Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education, 1 (2). pp. 31-50.

Tichenor, M & Tichenor, J. (2009). Comparing Teacher and Administrator Perspective on Multiple Dimensions of Teacher Professionalism. SRATE Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 9-18

Uwaimeiye, R and M. A. Onyewadume (2001). Job Satisfaction among Teachers in a Depressed Economy: Status, Challenges and Implications. Nigerian Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 6, No.2, pp. 168-177.

Yusof, H., & Mei Hung, C. (2018). Hubungan Profesionalisme Guru dengan Kepimpinan Guru di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina, Sarawak. Management Research Journal, 7, 1 -12.
Retrieved from http://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/MRJ/article/view/1443

Yusuf Ahmad. (2008). Masalah Kesediaan Guru Permulaan: Sekolah Perlu Memainkan Peranan Utama Untuk Menyelesaikannya. Kedah Darul Aman: Institut Perguruan Sultan Abdul Halim.
Published
2020-06-05
How to Cite
Abu Hassan, M. A., & Musa, K. (2020). Tahap profesionalisme guru sekolah kebangsaan di Semenanjung Malaysia. Management Research Journal, 9(2), 37-45. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/MRJ/article/view/3536