Attitudes of Preschool Teachers towards Artificial Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol14.1.9.2025Keywords:
preschool, artificial intelligence, teacher attitudesAbstract
Due to the developments in the field of artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence-supported education has begun to show more effectiveness in the field of early childhood. There are studies indicating that the use of artificial intelligence in early childhood education improves children's learning processes. Therefore, this study aimed to reveal the attitudes of preschool teachers towards the use of artificial intelligence in education. The explanatory design from mixed method designs was used in the study. The quantitative data of the study was obtained from interviews with 120 preschool teachers and qualitative the data was obtained from interviews with 10 preschool teachers. As a result of the study, it was revealed that the attitudes of preschool teachers towards artificial intelligence did not differ according to age and work experience, but differed according to gender. It was revealed that preschool teachers generally supported the use of artificial intelligence in preschool education. Another result was that preschool teachers with high skills in using technological devices had more negative attitudes towards artificial intelligence than teachers with low skills in using technological devices. Suggestions were presented in line with the results of the study. Finally, preschool teachers stated that artificial intelligence cannot be used in preschool education due to lack of equipment, costs, insufficient expertise in artificial intelligence, and artificial intelligence not being suitable for children's development. In line with the research results, trainings and programs can be developed to support preschool teachers' self-efficacy in digital literacy and artificial intelligence use. It can be recommended that the necessary infrastructure and systems for the use of artificial intelligence be provided to preschool learning environments and that this be offered to all institutions on the basis of equal opportunities.
References
Ali, S., DiPaola, D., Lee, I., Sindato, V., Kim, G., Blumofe, R., & Breazeal, C. (2021). Children as creators, thinkers and citizens in an AI-driven future. Computers and Education: Artifcial Intelligence, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100040
Aravantinos, S., Lavidas, K., Voulgari, I., Papadakis, S., Karalis, T., & Komis, V. (2024). Educational approaches with AΙ in primary school settings: A systematic review of the literature available in scopus. Education Sciences, 14(7), 744.
Arslan, K. (2020). Eğitimde Yapay Zekâ ve Uygulamaları. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1), 71-88.
Balcı, A. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma: Yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Bay, D. N. (2022). The perspective of preschool teachers on the use of digital technology. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal,11(2), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol11.2.6.2022
Beckers, J. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2001). The structure of computer anxiety: A six-factor model. Computers in human behavior, 17(1), 35-49.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Pegem Akademi. Ankara.
Chen, J. J., & Lin, J. C. (2024). Artificial intelligence as a double-edged sword: Wielding the POWER principles to maximize its positive effects and minimize its negative effects. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 25(1), 146-153.
Chen, Y.; Jensen, S.; Albert, L.J.; Gupta, S.; Lee, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) student assistants in the classroom: Designing chatbots to support student success. Inf. Syst. Front. 25, 161–182. [CrossRef]
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Coppin, B. (2004). Artificial Intelligent Illuminated. London: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Dağal, A. B., Dörterler, S. Öcal, Kanburoğlu, V., Yağcı, M., & Uyanık, G. (2022). Developing Preschool Teachers’ Belief Scale Regarding Educational Technologies: A Validity and Reliability Study.Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal,11(2), 136–151. https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol11.2.9.2022
Devi JS, Sreedhar MB, Arulprakash P, et al. (2022) A path towards child-centric artificial intelligence based education. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education 14(3), 9915–9922.
Flores-Vivar, J. M., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2023). Reflections on the ethics, potential, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the framework of quality education (SDG4). Comunicar, 31(74), 37-47.
Hashem, R., Ali, N., El Zein, F., Fidalgo, P., & Khurma, O. A. (2024). AI to the rescue: Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as a teacher ally for workload relief and burnout prevention. Research & Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 19, 1-26.
Huang, X.; Zou, D.; Cheng, G.; Chen, X.; Xie, H. (2023). Trends, research issues and applications of artificial intelligence in language education. Educ. Technol. Soc., 26, 112–131.
Jatileni, N. C. & Sanusi, T.I. & Olayele, A.S. & Ayanwale, A. M. & Agbo, J.F & Oyelere, B. P. (2023). Artifcial intelligence in compulsory level of education: perspectives from Namibian in- service teachers. Education and Information Technologies, May 2023, 1-15.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kewalramani S., Kidman G. and Palaiologou I. (2021). Using artificial intelligence (AI)-interfaced robotic toys in early childhood settings: A case for children’s inquiry literacy. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 29(5), 652–668.
Kim, H. Y. (2013). Statistical Notes for Clinical Researchers: Assessing Normal Distribution (2) Using Skewness and Kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52-54.
Konar, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence and soft computing: behavioral and cognitive modeling of the human brain. CRC press.
Kucirkova, N., & Mackey, M. (2020). Digital literacies and children’s personalized books: Locating the'self'. London Review of Education, 18(2), 151-162.
Kushmar, L.V., Vornachev, A.O Korobova.I.O., & Kaida,N.O. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Language Learning: What Are We Afraid of. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (8). 262-273. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call8.18
Lavidas, K., Voulgari, I., Papadakis, S., Athanassopoulos, S., Anastasiou, A., Filippidi, A., ... & Karacapilidis, N. (2024). Determinants of humanities and social sciences students’ intentions to use artificial intelligence applications for academic purposes. Information, 15(6), 314-328.
Lim, E. M. (2023). The effects of pre-service early childhood teachers’ digital literacy and self-efficacy on their perception of AI education for young children. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 12969-12995.
Lin, X.-F. & Chen, L. & Chan, K.K. & Peng, S. & Chen, X. & Xie, S. & Liu, J. & Hu, Q. (2022). Teachers’ Perceptions of Teaching Sustainable Artificial Intelligence: A Design Frame Perspective. Sustainability, 14, 7811
Lindner, A., & Berges, M. (2020, October). Can you explain AI to me? Teachers’ pre-concepts about Artificial Intelligence. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in education conference (FIE) (pp. 1-9). IEEE.
Majid, I., & Lakshmi, Y. V. (2020, July). Artificial Intelligence in Education. National,18 (2), 106-118
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Ozturk, E. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Early Childhood STEM Education: A Review of Pedagogical Paradigms, Ethical Issues, and Socio-Political Implications. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 11(2), 108-125.
Özer-Akkaya, M., & Çam Aktaş, B. (2023). Online preschool education during the COVID-19 PANDEMIC: Teacher experiences. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal,12(2),52–90. https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol12.2.4.2023
Papadakis, S., Kiv, A. E., Kravtsov, H., Osadchyi, V. V., Marienko, M. V., Pinchuk, O. P., ...& Semerikov, S. O. (2023). Revolutionizing education: using computer simulation and cloud-based smart technology to facilitate successful open learning. In Joint Proceedings of the 10th Illia O. Teplytskyi Workshop on Computer Simulation in Education, and Workshop on Cloud-based Smart Technologies for Open Education (CoSinEi and CSTOE 2022) co-located with ACNS Conference on Cloud and Immersive Technologies (No. 3358, pp. 1-18). CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
Park, C. S. Y., Haejoong, K. I. M., & Sangmin, L. E. E. (2021). Do less teaching, do more coaching: toward critical thinking for ethical applications of artificial intelligence. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 6(2), 97-100.
Prentzas J (2013) Artificial intelligence methods in early childhood education. In: Yang X-S (ed.) Artificial Intelligence, Evolutionary Computation and Metaheuristics: In the Footsteps of Alan Turing. Berlin/ Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, pp. 169–199.
Reiss, M. J. (2021). The Use of Al in Education: Practicalities and Ethical Considerations. London Review of Education, 19(1), n1.
Salaam, A. M. (2023). Examining the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Early Childhood Education Settings in Ghana: Educators’ Attitudes and Perceptions towards Its Long-Term Viability. American Journal of Education and Technology, 2(4), 36-49.
Silverman, D. (2014). Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE.
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). Unlocking the power of ChatGPT: A framework for applying generative AI in education. ECNU Review of Education, 20965311231168423.
Tang, Y. M., Chau, K. Y., Kwok, A. P. K., Zhu, T., & Ma, X. (2021). A systematic review of immersive technology applications for medical practice and education-Trends, application areas, recipients, teaching contents, evaluation methods, and performance. Educational Research Review, 35. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100429
Tapalova, O., & Zhiyenbayeva, N. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Education: AIEd for Personalised Learning Pathways. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 20(5), 639-653.
Thongprasit, J., & Wannapiroon, P. (2022). Framework of Artificial Intelligence Learning Platform for Education. International Education Studies, 15(1), 76-86.
Tektaş, M., Akbaş, A., & Topuz, V. (2002). Yapay zekâ tekniklerinin trafik kontrolünde kullanılması üzerine bir inceleme. Uluslararası Trafik ve Yol Güvenliği Kongresi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Uğraş, H., Uğraş, M., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2024). ChatGPT-supported education in primary schools: The potential of ChatGPT for sustainable practices. Sustainability, 16(22), 9855.
Wang, Y. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2022). Development and validation of an artificial intelligence anxiety scale: An initial application in predicting motivated learning behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 619-634.
Yang, X. (2019). Accelerated move for AI education in China. ECNU Review of Education, 2(3), 347-352.
Yang, H. (2023). The negative impact of artificial intelligence technology on college english teaching and the countermeasures. Int. J. Math. Syst. Sci., 6, 3127.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Servet Kardeş, Nur Uygun, Tuba Terim Türkmen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
