Flipping theory: Ways in which children’s experiences in the 21st century classroom can provide insight into the theories of Piaget and Vygotsky

Authors

  • Kimberly Sharkins School of Education, University of Alabama Birmingham, USA
  • Allison Newton Judson College, USA
  • Cora Causey School of Education, University of Alabama Birmingham, USA
  • James M. Ernest School of Education, University of Alabama Birmingham, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol6.2.2017

Keywords:

practice, theory, Piaget, Vygotsky, constructivism

Abstract

Although established in the last century, the theories of two well-known psychologists, Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky continue to be used throughout the world to prepare teachers and caregivers of young ch ildren(ACEI/Wortham, 2013). From an historical perspective, their theories provide insight regarding children’s growth, development, and learning. Beyond a general understanding however, in what ways do the theories of Piaget and Vygotsky impact 21st century pedagogy, and what might the implementation of those theories look like in today’s classrooms? Observations of children’s experiences in two constructivist oriented classrooms help to provide connections between practice and theory. One classroom draws upon the work of Charlotte Mason, a pioneer of early childhood education in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s and considers the relevance of constructivist education as children examine themselves and develop high moral standards. The second example provides examples of constructivism from a more traditional kindergarten classroom, but one where a teacher uses principals of constructivism to guide developmentally appropriate practices for young children. The purpose of this article is to show how using examples of practice in early childhood classrooms can provide the means for learning about theories of learning and development. Rather than professors using practice to help students understand abstract theory, we flip this pedagogical practice to show how theory can be used with intentional reflection to help teachers understand the practice they

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACEI/Wortham, S., (2013). Educating young children: A basic guide for training teachers and caregivers. Retrieved from:
https://www.acei.org/s/manual.pdf

Albaiz, N. E. A. & Ernest, J.M. (2015). Between kindergartners’ stickers and adolescents’ fancy cars: How to build an autonomous generation. Childhood Education, 91(5), 342-350.
DOI: 10.1080/00094056.2015.1090846

Allington, R. L., (2005). What counts as evidence in evidence-based education? Reading Today, 23(3).

Clay, M. M., (2015). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Clay, M. M., (2014). By different paths to common outcomes: Literacy, learning, and teaching. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Gambrell, L.B., Malloy, J.A., & Mazzoni, S.A., (2014). Evidence-based best practices in comprehensive literacy instruction. In Morrow & Gambrell (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (pp. 11-36). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Kamii, C. (1982). Number in preschool and kindergarten. Washington, DC: The National Association of Young Children.

Kamii, C., (1984). The aim of education envisioned by Piaget. The Phi Delta Kappa International, 65(6), 410-415.

Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V.S., & Miller, S. M. (2003). Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge, UK: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Lourenco, O., & Machado, A., (1996). In defense of Piaget’s theory: A reply to 10 common criticisms. American Psychological Association, 103(1), 143-162.

Lyle, S., (2000). Narrative understanding: developing a theoretical context for understanding how children make meaning in classroom settings. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(1), 45-63.

Manning, M.M., Manning, G.L., Long, R., & Wolfson, B.J., (1987). Reading and writing in the primary grades. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association of the United States.

Mason, C., (2008). Home Education: A Homeschooling Classic. Radford, VA: Wilder Publications, LLC.

Piaget, J., (1962). Comments on Vygotsky’s critical remarks concerning The Language and Thought of the Child, and Judgement and Reasoning in the Child. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1-14.

Piaget, J., (1964/1972). Development and learning. Reprinted with permission from R.E. Ripple (ed. with V.N. Rockcastle) from Piaget Rediscovered, 7-20.

Piaget, J., (1959). The language and thought of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Vygotsky, L. S., (1929). The problem of the cultural development of the child II. Journal of Genetic Psychology, (36), 415-32.

Vygotsky, L. S., (1962). Thought and Language. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Vygotsky, L., (1934/1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2017-10-02

How to Cite

Sharkins, K., Newton, A., Causey, C., & Ernest, J. M. (2017). Flipping theory: Ways in which children’s experiences in the 21st century classroom can provide insight into the theories of Piaget and Vygotsky. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 6, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol6.2.2017