Impact of Dynamic Assessment on Matriculation Students’ Learning Potential in Thermochemistry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol15.2.9.2025Keywords:
Dynamic Assessment, Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), Learning Potential Score (LPS), Matriculation, ThermochemistryAbstract
Dynamic assessment is a form of assessment that emphasizes the development of students’ learning potential rather than solely focusing on scores. This study aims to examine the effects of implementing dynamic assessment procedures on students’ learning potential in the topic of thermochemistry. The sample consisted of 10 students enrolled in a matriculation-level program, selected through purposive sampling to represent three achievement categories which are high, moderate, and low performers. The study adopted an interventionist dynamic assessment model divided into three phases, which are pre-test, individual face-to-face mediation, and post-test, which were implemented over a period of three weeks. Two sets of questions were used as achievement test instruments to determine both the actual and potential developmental levels of the students. From the pre-test and post-test scores, descriptive analysis and learning potential score (LPS) were calculated for each student to determine students’ learning potential. The findings show that dynamic assessment procedures can assist students across all performance categories in developing their learning potential in thermochemistry. Moreover, dynamic assessment offers an accurate depiction of students' learning potential, which conventional assessments lack. As a result, dynamic assessment and LPS are highly suitable for adoption in Malaysia’s assessment practices, especially in transitioning from assessments that merely measure achievement to those evaluating learning potential.
Downloads
References
Abdolrezapour, P. & Ghanbari, N. (2021). Enhancing learning potential score in EFL listening comprehension and self-regulated dynamic assessment procedures. Language Testing in Asia, 11(10), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00126-5
Barabadi, E., Khajavy, G.H. & Kamrood, A. M. (2018). Applying interventionist and interactionist approaches to dynamic assessment for L2 listening comprehension. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 681-700. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11346a
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
de Raadt, A., Warrens, M. J., Bosker, R. J., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2021). A comparison of reliability coefficients for ordinal rating scales. Journal of Classification, 38, 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-021-09386-5
Ghaemi, H., & Houshangi, M. (2021). Group dynamic assessment of the listening skill A ZPD-based study of Iranian TOEFL iBT candidates. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol11.2.6.2021
Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2015). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Kamali, M., Abbasi, M., & Sadighi, F. (2018). The effect of dynamic assessment on L2 grammar acquisition by Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(1), 72-78. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.1p.72
Kamrood, A. M., Davaudi, M., Ghaniabadi, S. & Amirian, S. M. R. (2019). Diagnosing L2 learners’ development through online computerized dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 868-897. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1645181
Kozulin, A., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International, 23(1), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034302023001733
McGinn, E. (2018). Teaching and researching ethically: Guidance for instructor-researchers, educational developers, and research ethics personnel. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.1.2
Ntumi, S., Agbenyo, S., & Bulala, T. (2023). Estimating the psychometric properties (item difficulty,
discrimination and reliability indices) of test items using Kuder-Richardson approach (KR-20). Shanlax International Journal of Education, 11(3), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v11i3.6081
Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. United Kingdom: Springer.
Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr166oa
Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA). Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482935
Vo, K., Sarkar, M., White, P. J., & Yuriev, E. (2022). Problem solving in chemistry supported by metacognitive scaffolding: Teaching associates’ perspectives and practices. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(2), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RP00242B
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Developmental of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yang, Y., & Qian, D. D. (2020). Promoting L2 English learners’ reading proficiency through computerized dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5-6), 628-652. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1585882
Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6
Zare, M., Barjesteh, H., & Biria, R. (2021). The effect of critical thinking-oriented dynamic assessment on Iranian EFL learners’ learning potential: A study of reading comprehension skill. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 40(2), 193–227. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2021.39475.2935
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohamad Termizi Nurdin, Fauziah Abdul Rahim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


