Gender Differences in Students' Motivation and Conceptual Knowledge in Chemistry Using Technology-Integrated Formative Assessment

  • Tadesse Hagos College of Education and Behavioral Studies, Addis Ababa University, ETHIOPIA
  • Dereje Andargie Institute of Education, Debre Berhan University, ETHIOPIA
Keywords: conceptual knowledge, gender, formative assessment, motivation, technology


This study examines the impact of gender and technology-integrated formative assessment on learning chemistry in general and chemical equilibrium in particular from the perspective of learning and motivation. To achieve the aforementioned objective, a quasi-experimental, non-equivalent, non-randomized pre-test and post-test research design was adopted. There were three groups in the study: two experimental and one comparative. The experimental groups implemented formative assessment (FA) and technology-integrated formative assessment (TIFA) strategies, whereas the comparison group used lecture style method.  Two intact classes were chosen for treatment and one intact class was chosen for comparison groups using a random sampling technique. The Chemical Equilibrium Conceptual Test (CECT) and the Chemistry Motivational Questionnaire (CMQ), both adapted from the literature, were used to gather data. The reliability coefficient for CMQ was calculated using Cronbach's alpha. The Kudder Richardson formula 20 was used to check the CECT's internal consistency (KR-20). Two-way ANOVA statistics were used to analyze the data. Gender has no effect on students' motivation or conceptual knowledge when learning chemical equilibrium. There was no interaction impact of treatment and gender on the conceptual and motivational test scores. TIFA was shown to be more successful than the other two groups in promoting students' conceptions and motivation in learning chemical equilibrium, regardless of gender. Chemistry teachers should implement TIFA as a teaching method in their classes, according to the study. It is also recommended that teachers use it into their classes to help motivate students.


Download data is not yet available.


Adigun, J., Onihunwa, J., Irunokhai, E., Sada, Y., & Adesina, O. (2015). Effect of Gender on Students' Academic Performance in Computer Studies in Secondary Schools in New Bussa, Borgu Local Government of Niger State. Journal of Education and practice, 6(33), 1-7.

Ajayi, V. O., & Ogbeba, J. (2017). Effect of gender on senior secondary chemistry students’ achievement in stoichiometry using hands-on activities. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(8), 839-842. DOI: 10.12691/education-5-8-1

Aldon, G., & Panero, M. (2020). Can digital technology change the way mathematics skills are assessed?. ZDM, 52(7), 1333-1348.

Anuar, S., Nizar, N., & Ismail, M. A. (2021). The Impact of Using Augmented Reality as Teaching Material on Students’ Motivation. Asian Journal of Vocational Education And Humanities, 2(1), 1-8.

Amelink, C. (2009). Literature overview: Gender differences in science achievement. SWE-AWE CASEE verviews, 3(2), 1-22.

Asamoah, D., & Derkye, S. S. B. S. C. (2019). Gender Difference in Formative Assessment Knowledge of Senior High School Teachers in the Upper West Region of Ghana. assessment, 10(6). DOI: 10.7176/JEP/10-6-08

Barkley, E. F., & Major, C. H. (2020). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. John Wiley & Sons.

Barksdale, S. (2018, June). Assessment with Technology Integrated Menus: Creating a Bridge Between Traditional and Student-Centered Learning. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning (pp. 250-255). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Beatty, I. D., & Gerace, W. J. (2009). Technology-enhanced formative assessment: A research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. Journal of Science Educationand Technology, 18(2), 146-162.

Bellman, A., Foshay, W. R., & Gremillion, D. (2014). A developmental model for adaptive and differentiated instruction using classroom networking technology. In The Mathematics Teacher in the Digital Era (pp. 91-110). Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4638-1-5

Bhagat, K. K., & Spector, J. M. (2017). Formative assessment in complex problem-solving domains: The emerging role of assessment technologies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 312-317.

Burns, M. K., Klingbeil, D. A., & Ysseldyke, J. (2010). The effects of technology‐enhanced formative evaluation on student performance on state accountability math tests. Psychology in the Schools, 47(6), 582-591.

Cauley, K. M., & McMillan, J. H. (2010). Formative assessment techniques to support student motivation and achievement. The clearing house: A journal of educational strategies, issues and ideas, 83(1), 1-6.

Estawul, S. S., Sababa, L. K., & Filgona, J. (2016). Effect of Fieldtrip Strategy on Senior Secondary School Students’academic Achievement in Geography in Numan Educational Zone, Adamawa State, Nigeria. European Journal of Education Studies.

Faber, J. M., Luyten, H., & Visscher, A. J. (2017). The effects of a digital formative assessment tool on mathematics achievement and student motivation: Results of a randomized experiment. Computers & education, 106, 83-96.

Filgona, J., & Sababa, L. K. (2017). Effect of Gender on Senior Secondary School Students’academic Achievement in Geography in Ganye Educational Zone, Nigeria. European Journal of Education Studies.

Gambrari, I. A., Yusuf, M. O., & Thomas, D. A. (2015). Effects of Computer-Assisted STAD, LTM and ICI Cooperative Learning Strategies on Nigerian Secondary School Students' Achievement, Gender and Motivation in Physics. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(19), 16-28.

García, L. M., Pardo-Hernandez, H., Superchi, C., de Guzman, E. N., Ballesteros, M., Roteta, N. I., ... & Alonso-Coello, P. (2017). Methodological systematic review identifies major limitations in prioritization processes for updating. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 86, 11-24.

Glory, G. E., & Ihenko, S. (2017). Influence of gender on interest and academic achievement of students in integrated science in Obio-Akpor local government area of Rivers State. European Scientific Journal, 13(10), 211-219.

Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176.

Godpower-Echie, G., & Amadi, J. (2013). Attitude and gender differences on students’ achievement in Chemistry. New Era Research Journal of Human Educational and Sustainable Development, (3), 64-68.

Haßler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S. (2016). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2), 139-156.

Higgins, S. (2016). New (and old) technologies for learning: innovation and educational growth. Asociación Científica de Psicología y Educación (ACIPE).

Irons, A., & Elkington, S. (2021). Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback.Routledge.

Jeffrey, L. M., Milne, J., Suddaby, G., & Higgins, A. (2014). Blended learning: How teachers balance the blend of online and classroom components. Journal of Information Technology Education, 13.

Karp, M. J. M., & Fletcher, J. (2014). Adopting new technologies for student success: A readiness framework.

Kaware, S. S., & Sain, S. K. (2015). ICT application in education: an overview. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach & Studies, 2(1), 25-32.

Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Firestone, J., & Etopio, E. (2018). A meta-analysis with examination of moderators of student cognition, affect, and learning outcomes while using serious educational games, serious games, and simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 158-167.

Leenknecht, M., Wijnia, L., Köhlen, M., Fryer, L., Rikers, R., & Loyens, S. (2021). Formative assessment as practice: The role of students’ motivation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 236-255.

Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology‐enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 487-504.

Matilda, U. O., & Helen, A. O. (2019). Effect of formative classroom assessment on students’ academic achievement in junior secondary school basic science in Egor local government area of Edo state. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(15), 184-189.

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2018). Conducting educational design research. Routledge.

Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 106(1), 121.

Mensah, A. (2017). Promoting conceptual change in chemical equilibrium through metacognition development students’ achievement and metacognitive skills. October.

Mitchell, R. (2015). The implications of school improvement and school effectiveness research for primary school principals in Ethiopia. Educational Review, 67(3), 328-342.

Obery, A., Lux, N., Cornish, J., Grimberg, B. I., & Hartshorn, A. (2021). Competitive Games as Formative Assessment in Informal Science Learning: Improvement or Hindrance?. TechTrends, 65(4), 454-463.

Okoye, C. M. (2015). The Efficacy of Formative Assessment on Chemistry Students’ Achievement and Knowledge Retention. International Journal of Research, 9(1).

Olayinka, A. R. B. (2016). Effects of Instructional Materials on Secondary Schools Students' Academic Achievement in Social Studies in Ekiti State, Nigeria. World Journal of Education, 6(1), 32-39.

Özmen, H. (2008). Determination of students’ alternative conceptions about chemical equilibrium: A review of research and the case of Turkey. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(3), 225–233.

Razavi, M. R. (2021). Gender differences in the effect of virtual social networks use on students’ academic performance. Current Psychology, 40(2), 744-750.

Redecker, C., & Johannessen, Ø. (2013). Changing assessment: Towards a new assessment paradigm using ICT. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 79-96.

Roslan, R., Mohd Ayub, A. F., Ghazali, N., & Zulkifli, N. N. (2021). The Development of a Collaborated Gamified E-Quiz and Strategy Game Mobile Application to Increase Students’ Motivation and Continuance Usage Intention. ANP Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 2(2), 74-81.

Serrano, D. R., Dea‐Ayuela, M. A., Gonzalez‐Burgos, E., Serrano‐Gil, A., & Lalatsa, A. (2019). Technology‐enhanced learning in higher education: How to enhance student engagement through blended learning. European Journal of Education, 54(2), 273-286.

Shirley, M. L., Irving, K. E., Sanalan, V. A., Pape, S. J., & Owens, D. T. (2011). The practicality of implementing connected classroom technology in secondary mathematics and science classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 459-481.

Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2016). Rethinking assessment in a digital age: Opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 454-476.

Ugwumaduka, E. B., & Ogunyemi, O. T. (2021). Formative Assessment, Feedback, Remediation and Students’ Academic Achievement in Basic Science: A Quasi-Experiment. African Journal of Education, Science and Technology, 6(3), 337-349.

Veloo, A., Lee, H. H., & Seung, C. L. (2015). Gender and ethnicity differences manifested in chemistry achievement and self-regulated learning. International Education Studies, 8(8), 1-12.

How to Cite
Hagos, T., & Andargie, D. (2022). Gender Differences in Students’ Motivation and Conceptual Knowledge in Chemistry Using Technology-Integrated Formative Assessment. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 12(1), 10-22.