Effectiveness of Feedback on Continuous Assessment: Students’ Views

Authors

  • Suguna Sankaran Institute of Teacher Education Islamic Education Campus, Bandar Baru Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Low Suet Fin Perdana University, Bukit Damansara, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol15.1.4.2025

Keywords:

continuous assessment, feedback, students’ views

Abstract

Feedback is a crucial component of the learning process, particularly in the realm of continuous assessment, where it serves to enhance student understanding, guide improvement, and foster engagement. This study examined the effectiveness of feedback mechanisms within the context of continuous assessment from the viewpoint of students. Through a cross-sectional study employing quantitative methods, data were collected from a diverse sample of students enrolled at the Institute of Teacher Education Malaysia under the Bachelor of Teaching Degree Preparation Program (PPISMP), Bachelor of Teaching Degree Program (PISMP), and Postgraduate Diploma in Education Program (PDPP). The findings highlighted that most students have a very positive perception of lecturers’ feedback on continuous assessment. Many students valued constructive feedback as a catalyst for future improvement, while a small number expressed concerns regarding the consistency and usefulness of feedback provided by instructors. Additionally, the findings provided vital insights for lecturers to use as guidelines in giving feedback on students’ continuous assessments. Overall, this study underscored the importance of soliciting and integrating students’ views in the design and implementation of feedback mechanisms within continuous assessment frameworks, thereby optimizing learning outcomes and promoting student engagement and satisfaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well. Routledge.

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2019). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 1023-1038.

Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572132

Carless, D. (2019). Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. Routledge.

Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2017). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.

Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70-120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2003). Unlocking formative assessment. Hodder-moa, Auckland, NZ.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Iqbal, M., & Anjum, A. (2017). Effect of continuous assessment techniques on students' performance at elementary level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(1), 91-100

Li, L., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2019). Assumptions behind the use of t-tests in medical research. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives, 7(2), e00431. https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.431

Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(8), 1240-1258.

Nicol, D. J. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.

Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (2011). Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 125-136.

Osuala, R., Onwuagboke, B., & Agoha, T. (2018). Continuous assessment feedback and students’ performances in semester examinations in a college of education. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 688-693.

Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O'Donovan, B. (2018). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1), 91-103.

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714

Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535-550.

Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Brown, S. (2024). Learning and teaching in higher education: A guide. Routledge. DOI:

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795

Tofade, T., Elsner, J., & Haines, S. T. (2014). Best practice strategies for effective use of questions as a teaching tool. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(2), 38.

Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500353061

Yan, Z., & Yang, L. (Eds.). (2021). Assessment as learning: Maximising opportunities for student learning and achievement. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-10

How to Cite

Sankaran, S., & Low, S. F. (2025). Effectiveness of Feedback on Continuous Assessment: Students’ Views. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 15(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol15.1.4.2025