Holistic 360° Teaching Evaluation Toward a Teaching Effectiveness Index (TEX)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/ejoss.vol11.sp2.3.2025Keywords:
360° teaching evaluation, inspiring educators, values-based education, higher educationAbstract
This article reported teaching evaluations from three viewpoints: students, teaching colleagues, and self-evaluations. The data was gathered from Malaysia's largest public institution, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), including contributions from diploma, foundation, undergraduate, and postgraduate students, together with their lecturers, during two consecutive semesters (20232 and 20234). We employed statistical analysis software to scrutinise the dataset for a comprehensive descriptive analysis of demographic information and three separate teaching evaluation scores across colleges, faculties, academic centres, and branch campuses. The Teaching Effectiveness Index (TEX) analysis demonstrated a slight enhancement in the 20234 semester relative to the 20232 semester. This dataset offers critical insights for higher education institutions, both public and private, aiming to develop, improve, and execute comprehensive 360° teaching evaluation systems through a wider comparison of teaching evaluation effectiveness across various faculties and campuses nationwide.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, M. H. T., Roslim, N., & Roslim, N. (2022). Open and distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: University students’ learning experiences and academic achievements. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(1), 106–117. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/AJUE/article/view/17177
Academic Affairs Division, U. T. M. (2019). Education 5.0: UiTM Academic Compass, Navigating the Future. UiTM Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40196-013-0016-5
Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Effendi, M., Matore, E. M., Noh, M. F. M., Zainal, M. A., Muktar, M., & Matore, E. R. M. (2020). The 360-degree teaching evaluation preferability with gender among TVET teachers using chi-square test for independence. Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Research Day, 243–244.
Evans, T., Mejía-Ramos, J. P., & Inglis, M. (2022). Do mathematicians and undergraduates agree about explanation quality? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 111(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10164-2
Mohd Salleh, M. I., Ibrahim, Z., Othman, K. I., Yusoff, H., & Ariffin, S. (2020). Educator acceptance of Education 5.0@ UiTM framework and initiatives: a descriptive analysis. International Journal of E-Learning and Higher Education (IJELHE), 12(1), 99–108. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/65919/
Movafaghpour, M. (2019). Developing 360 degree performance evaluation method for school teachers. International Journal of Research in Industrial Engineering, 8(1).
Salleh, M. I. M., Alias, N. A., Ariffin, S., Ibrahim, Z., Ramli, A. R., & Aliman, S. (2023). The sudden transition to remote learning in response to COVID-19: lessons from Malaysia. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2023 10:1, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01751-6
Zhang, J. (2024). A Study on English Teachers’ Behavior and Teaching Effectiveness in Universities Based on Big Data Technology. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.00456
Zondo, R. W. D. (2018). The influence of a 360-degree performance appraisal on labour productivity in an automotive manufacturing organisation. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v21i1.2046
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohd Idzwan Mohd Salleh, Suriyani Ariffin, Zainuddin Ibrahim, Ahmad Razi Ramli, Sharifah Aliman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
