Kepentingan Kajian Rintis dan Pengujian kebolehpercayaan borang selidik: Kajian tahap kesejahteraan hidup terhadap strategi daya tindak ke atas risiko pengulangan jenayah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/ejoss.vol11.2.6.2025Keywords:
Tahap kesejahteraan material, tahap kesejahteraan subjektif, strategi daya tindak, risiko pengulangan jenayahAbstract
Artikel ini merupakan sebuah penulisan tentang kajian rintis yang dilakukan ke atas soal selidik yang dibina. Artikel ini membincangkan tentang kepentingan menjalankan kajian rintis serta menguji soal selidik ke atas gelandangan bekas banduan sebagai responden kajian. Soal selidik ini adalah berkaitan dengan tahap kesejahteraan material, kesejahteraan subjektif terhadap strategi daya tindak ke atas risiko pengulangan jenayah. Sampel responden adalah dari kalangan gelandangan bekas banduan yang hidup di jalanan selepas dibebaskan. Mereka adalah dari kalangan yang hidup secara rentan di jalanan. Kajian ini telah menjalankan kajian rintis dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif ke atas 30 orang responden gelandangan bekas banduan sekitar Jalan Chow Kit. Pemilihan sampel bagi kajian ini menggunakan teknik persampelan bertujuan dengan menetapkan kriteria-kriteria khusus yang diperlukan. Kajian rintis ini melibatkan seramai 31 orang responden; seramai 26 orang lelaki dan 5 orang perempuan. Hasil nilai Alpha Cronbach keseluruhan bagi dimensi kesejahteraan hidup material menunjukkan sebanyak 0.894. Diikuti dengan dimensi kesejahteraan hidup subjektif sebanyak sebanyak 0.944. Hasil nilai Alpha Cronbach buat dimensi risiko gelandangan menunjukkan sebanyak 0.839 dan dimensi risiko pengulangan jenayah sebanyak 0.895. Dan dimensi terakhir iaitu dimensi strategi daya tindak menunjukkan nilai sebanyak 0.779. Hasil kajian rintis yang dijalankan telah membuktikan soal selidik yang dibina ini bersesuaian untuk digunakan bagi kajian sebenar dengan beberapa pembetulan yang dilakukan. Alpha Cronbach 0.70 atau ke atas secara amnya dianggap boleh diterima untuk tujuan penyelidikan, menunjukkan bahawa item dalam soal selidik boleh mengukur konstruk yang sama. Walaupun kajian rintis ini membawa kepada pelbagai cabaran namun hasil kajian rintis yang dilakukan menunjukkan nilai cronbach alpha yang tinggi bagi setiap bahagian angkubah yang ingin diukur. Antara cabaran yang dilalui ketika kajian rintis dilakukan adalah seperti: daya kefahaman responden yang rendah, kesukaran mendapatkan responden, soalan kabur, pengulangan soalan, format soal selidik dan item yang banyak. Keadaan ini membawa kepada usaha untuk menambahbaik soal selidik ini agar memastikan proses kajian lapangan sebenar yang lebih lancar dapat dilakukan kelak.
Downloads
References
André, S., Dewilde, C., & Muffels, R. (2019). Housing tenure, housing wealth and subjective wellbeing in Australia: The case of unemployment. In Wealth (s) and subjective well-being (pp. 281-304). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Arain, M., Campbell, M., Cooper, C., & Lancaster, G. (2010). What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 67 - 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-67.
Arnold, D.M., Burns, K.E., Adhikari, N.K., Kho, M.E., Meade, M.O., & Cook, D.J. (2009). The design and interpretation of pilot trials in clinical research in critical care. Crit Care Med, 37(1 Suppl), S69-74.
Azizah, Md Yusof, Jamal Ali, & Roslina Kamarudin. (2014). Kesejahteraan hidup subjektif: Pengaruh elemen ekonomi dan bukan ekonomi. Prosiding PERKEM ke-9. PERKEM. Retrieved from http://www.ukm.my/fep/perkem/pdf/perkem2014/PERKEM_2014_4D4.pdf.
Berawi, F.A. & Ismail, N.A (2019). Gelandangan di Kuala Lumpur: Tinjauan awal. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337679453_Gelandangan_di_Kuala_Lumpur_Tinjauan_Awal [2 Disember 2021].
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press
Chi-Hong T. & Sim, D. (2020). Sample siza planning for pilot studies. Journal Title XX(X): 1-15
Christodoulou, E., Kalokairinou, A., Koukia, E., Intas, G., Apostolara, P., Daglas, A. & Zyga, S. (2015). The test retest reliability and polit testing of the the new technology and nursing students learning styles questionnaire. International journal of caring sciences. 8(3)
Conway, V.J. & Terry, D.J. (1992). Appraised controllability as a moderator of the effectives of different coping strategies: A test of the goodness-of-fit hypothesis. Australian Journal of Psychology, 44(1), 1–7.
Diener, E. & Scollon, C. (2003). Subjective well being is desirable, but not the Summum Bonum. Workshop on Well Being. Minneapolis, USA. UMN. Retrieved from http:// www.tc.umn.edu/~tiberius/workshop_papers/DIENER.pdf.
Doody, O., & Doody, C. (2015). Conducting a pilot study: case study of a novice researcher. British journal of nursing, 24 21, 1074-8. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2015.24.21.1074.
Douglas, K. S., Guy, L. S., Reeves, K. A., & Weir, J. (2005). HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and annotated bibliography.
Farmanova, E., Grenier, J., & Chomienne, M. H. (2013). Pilot testing of a questionnaire for the evaluation of mental health services in family health team clinics in Ontario. Healthcare quarterly, 16(4).
Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R.S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21(3), 219–239.
Fraser, J., Falhman, D., Arscott, J., & Guillot, I. (2018). Pilot testing for feasibility in a study of student retention and attrition in online undergraduate programs. International review of reaserch in open and distributed learning, 9(1).
Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Brock-Utne, B. (2010). An exploration of the importance of piloting and access as action research. Educational Action Research, 18, 359–372.
Haryati Shafii & Nurasyikin Miskam, N. (2011). Pembentukan penunjuk dan indeks kualiti hidup bagi mengukur kesejahteraan hidup masyarakat di Pekan Parit Raja, Johor [Paper presentation]. Persidangan Kebangsaan Geografi dan Alam Sekitar, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Hassan, Z., Schattner, P., & Mazza, D. (2006). Doing A Pilot Study: Why Is It Essential?. Malaysian family physician: the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 1 2-3, 70-3.
Idris, M.A.H. & Ramli, M.A. 2017. Golongan gelandangan di Malaysia: Antara perluasan tafsiran Asnaf Ibnu Al-Sabil dan Al-Riqab. Dlm Najahudin Lateh, Muhamad Rahimi Osman & Ghafarullahhuddin Din (pnyt.). Isu-Isu Kontemporari dalam Zakat, Wakaf dan Filantropi Islam, hlm. 121–131. Shah Alam: Akademik Pengajian Islam Kontemporari.
Junyong I. (2017). Introduction of pilot study. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 70(6): 601-605.
Kannan, S., & Gowri, S. (2015). Pilot studies: Are they appropriately reported?. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 6, 207 - 210. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.167097.
Khairudin, C.T (2017). Dimensi kebahagiaan golongan dewasa Melayu. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation] Universiti Malaya.
Kim, Y. (2010). The pilot study in qualitative inquiry: Identifying issues and learning lessons for culturally competent research. Qualitative Social Work, 10, 190–206
Kraemer, H.C., Mintz, J., Noda, A., Tinklenberg, J., & Yesavage, J.A. (2006). Caution regarding the use of pilot studies to guide power calculations for study proposals. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 63(5), 484-9
LaGasse, A. (2013). Pilot and feasibility studies: application in music therapy research. Journal of Music Therapy, 50 4, 304-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/50.4.304.
Lancaster, G.A., Dodd, S., & Williamson, P.R. (2004) Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract, 10(2), 307-12
Lazarus, R.S. & Folkman, S. (1984a). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.
Lazarus, R.S. & Folkman, S. (1984b). Coping and adaptation. Dlm. Gentry, W.D. (pnyt.). Handbook of Behavioural Medicine, hlm. 282–325. New York: Guilford.
Lenth, R. (2001). Some Practical Guidelines for Effective Sample Size Determination. The American Statistician, 55, 187–193.
Leon, A., Davis, L., & Kraemer, H. (2011). The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. Journal of psychiatric research, 45 5, 626-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008.
Malmqvist, J., Hellberg, K., Mollas, G., Rose, R. & Shevlin, M. (2019). Conducting the pilot study: a neglected part of the research prosess? Methological finding supporting the importance of piloting in qualitative research studies. International journal of qualitative methods, 18, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919878341.
Mikuska, E. (2017). The Importance of Piloting or Pre-Testing Semi-Structured Interviews and Narratives. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473977754.
Nik Shahrizan Nik Mad, Marzudi Md Yunus & Muhammad Shamsinor Abdul Azziz (2021). Aspek dan Penilaian Kesejahteraan Subjektif: Kebahagiaan, Kegembiraan, Kepuasan dan Kualiti Hidup. Jurnal Pengajian Melayu, 32(2), 94 -111.
Nunnally, J. C. (1967), Psychometric Theory, 1st ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nyatanga, B. (2005). Do pilot studies have any value in research?. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 11 7, 312. https://doi.org/10.12968/IJPN.2005.11.7.18482.
Pearson, N., Naylor, P., Ashe, M.C., Fernandez, M., Sze L. Y. & Wolfenden, L. (2020). Guidance for conducting feasibility and pilot studies for implementation trials. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 6(1), 167. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00634-w.
Popova, D., & Pishniak, A. (2017). Measuring individual material well-being using multidimensional indices: an application using the Gender and Generation Survey for Russia. Social Indicators Research, 130, 883-910.
Ramli, M.W. & Dawood, S.R.S. 2017. Memahami permasalahan golongan terpinggir di bandar: Kajian kes gelandangan di George Town, Pulau Pinang. Geografi 5(2): 78–94.
Sampson, H. (2004). Navigating the waves: the usefulness of a pilot in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 4, 383 - 402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104047236.
Sirgy, M. J. (2018). The psychology of material well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 13(2), 273-301.
Tate, R., Beauregard, F., Peter, C. & Marotta, L. (2023). Pilot testing as a strategy to develop interview and questionnaire skills for schorlar practitioners: a selection of education doctorate students reflective vignettes. Journal on transforming professional practice, 8(4), 20-25. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2023.333.
Teijlingen, E., & Hundley, V. (2002). The importance of pilot studies. Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain): 1987), 16 40, 33-6. https://doi.org/10.7748/NS2002.06.16.40.33.C3214.
Thabane, L., Ma, J., Chu, R., Cheng, J., Ismaila, A., Rios, L., Robson, R., Thabane, M., Giangregorio, L., & Goldsmith, C. (2010). A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 1 - 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-1.
White, B. S., & Branch, R. M. (2008). Systematic Pilot Testing as a Step in the Instructional Design Process of Corporate Training and Development. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 14(3), 75-94.
Vertommen, T., Verhelle, H., Martijn, F.M., & De Boeck, M. (2021). Static and Dynamic Recidivism (2021). Risk Factors of People Who Have Committed Child Sex Offenses in Sport. Front Sports Act Living, 5(3), 624548.
Vogel, S., & Draper-Rodi, J. (2017). The importance of pilot studies, how to write them and what they mean (Editorial). International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 23, 2–3.
Yukhnenko, D., Blackwood, N., & Fazel, S. (2020). Risk factors for recidivism in individuals receiving community sentences: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CNS spectrums, 25(2), 252-263.
Zailinawati Abu Hassan, Schattner P., & Mazza, D. (2006). Doing a pilot study: why is it essential? Malaysian Family Physician, 1(2&3), 70-73
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohd Alif Jasni, Zakiyah Jamaluddin, Muna Maryam Azmy, Nor Suzylah Sohaimi, Nor A'tikah Mat Ali, Sofi Mohd Fikri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
