Development and Evaluation of Ubod Cocos nucifera Balls as Plant-Based Meatball Alternatives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/Keywords:
formulation, ubod, cocos nucifera, ball, meatballAbstract
The consumption of meat has long been associated with various health and environmental concerns, prompting the exploration of alternative protein sources. This study aimed to formulate a Cocos nucifera ubod ball, specifically, it aimed to utilize the inner core of coconut palm tree species, as a viable substitute for meat. A quantitative research method and quasi-experimental research design were used in this study. The research environment was one of the state universities in Cebu City. The respondents of this study were the 23 BTLEd students and 15 panels of experts. The Sensory Evaluation Form and Hedonic Rating Scale were used as an instrument for data gathering. Among the four treatments, treatment 3 was chosen to undergo microbial analysis with the best measurement of 70% ubod and 30% flour. Thus, the results of the microbial analysis of the product were within the safe limit and safe for consumption. Four treatments of ubod ball were prepared and the results showed that the treatment 2 and treatment 3 ubod balls are acceptable and do not have significant differences in terms of its sensory characteristics and the overall acceptability. Among the four treatments, the control treatment was the most acceptable with a computed mean of 8.13 which means extremely-liked. The treatment 4 was the only moderately liked by the respondents with a computed mean of 6.76. Furthermore, a techno-guide on ubod ball was then developed showcasing its microbial laboratory results, sensory characteristics results, objectives, recipe and costs. Therefore, it is concluded that there is a need to improve or revised the procedure made and amount of measurement in the ubod ball.
Downloads
References
[1] Afzal, M., Dolor, P., Jamison, I., Sevelleno, K., & Valdez, A. (2022). Consumers’ Acceptability of Vegan-meatball Varieties as Commercial Meatballs. ASEAN Journal of Economic and Economic Education, 1(2), 95-100.
[2] Bolhuis, D. P., and Forde, C. G. (2020). Application of food texture to moderate oral processing behaviors and energy intake. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 106, 445- 456.
[3] Eshel G, Stainier P, Shepon A, Swaminathan A. Environmentally optimal, nutritionally sound, protein and energy conserving plant based alternatives to U.S. meat. Sci Rep. 2019;9:10345. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46590-1.
[4] Fiorentini, M., Kinchla, A. J., & Nolden, A. A. (2020). Role of sensory evaluation in consumer acceptance of plant-based meat analogs and meat extenders: A scoping review. Foods, 9(9), 1334.
[5] Hafid et. al., (2020). Organoleptic Characteristics of Chicken Meatballs that Using Gelatin as a Gelling Agent
[6] Jiang, H., Chen, W., Jia, Z., & Tao, F. (2020). Physiochemical properties of short‐term frying oil for chicken wing and its oxidative stability in an oil‐in‐water emulsion. Food science & nutrition, 8(1), 668-674.
[7] Lumanlan, J.C.; Fernando, W.M.A.D.B.; Jayasena, V. Mechanisms of oil uptake during deep frying and applications of predrying and hydrocolloids in reducing fat content of chips. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 1661–1670.
[8] Okuskhanova, E., Smolnikova, F., Kassymov, S., Zinina, O., Mustafayeva, A., (2017). Development of minced meatball composition for the population from unfavorable ecological regions. Annual Research & Review in Biology, 1-9.
[9] Romão, B., Botelho, R. B. A., Nakano, E. Y., Raposo, A., Han, H., Vega-Muñoz, A., ... & Zandonadi, R. P. (2022). Are vegan alternatives to meat products healthy? A study on nutrients and main ingredients of products commercialized in Brazil. Frontiers in Public Health, 10.
[10] Szymandera‐Buszka, K., Jędrusek‐Golińska, A., Waszkowiak, K., & Hęś, M. (2020). Sensory sensitivity to sour and bitter taste among people with Crohn's disease and folic acid supplementation. Journal of Sensory Studies, 35(1), e12550.
[11] Watson, R. (2015). Quantitative research. Nursing standard, 29(31).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 RAYMUND CATUBIG, JANINE SUICO, CHARESS GOLES

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

