Validity Assessment of An Integrated Realistic Mathematics Education and Project-based Inquiry Learning Module

Authors

  • Sri Rejeki Department of Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Mazlini Adnan Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Che Nidzam Che Ahmad Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Budi Murtiyasa Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Jalan Ahmad Yani, Pabelan, Kartasura, Sukoharjo 57162, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/ejsmt.vol12.sp.10.2025

Keywords:

Mathematics Education, Project-based Inquiry, Linear Programming

Abstract

Text-based learning resources are critical for helping pupils learn mathematics. However, limited studies have been conducted on designing mathematics modules as text-based learning materials for Vocational High School (VHS) students. Hence, developing an integrated Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) and Project-based Inquiry (PIL) module could be an innovative solution. This study analyzes the validity assessment as a part of the developmental stage of developing the module. The validation process was conducted by a team of five experts in mathematics education, who used a questionnaire to assess the face and content validity. The questionnaire evaluated four key aspects of face validity: language, text, graphics, and presentation. In terms of content validity, it considered five crucial elements: suitability to the target population, implementation of each module activity based on the principles of RME and the phases of PIL, compatibility with the allocated time, ability to enhance student performance in terms of creativity and achievement, and potential to influence attitudes towards excellence, particularly in terms of student motivation. The data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics and percentages. Based on the data analysis, the average score percentage for all face and content validity aspects is 91.6% and 89.8%, respectively. It is in a good category because those range from 84% to 98%. Therefore, all module aspects have high content validity and exceed 70%.

Downloads

Author Biography

  • Sri Rejeki, Department of Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia

    Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Jalan Ahmad Yani, Pabelan, Kartasura, Sukoharjo 57162, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia

References

[1] A. R. Mohd Nazri et al., “Development of folktales digital story module as basic literacy learning for indigenous children in rural preschool,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1529, no. 4, pp. 1–7, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1529/4/042044.

[2] S. Rejeki, M. Adnan, C. N. Che Ahmad, and B. Murtiyasa, “An integrated RME and PIL mathematics module for technical vocational high school learning: A need analysis,” Eur. J. Educ. Pedagog., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 161–167, 2023, doi: 10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.2.485.

[3] M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, “Seen through other eyes—opening up new vistas in realistic mathematics education through visions and experiences from other countries,” in International reflections on the Netherlands didactics of mathematics: Visions on and experiences with realistic mathematics education, 2020, pp. 1–20.

[4] A. Mazlini, P. Marzita, M. T. Nor’ain, M. Siti Mistima, and C. H. Ng, “Integrating STEM education through Project-Based Inquiry Learning (PIL) in topic space among year one children,” Turkish Online J. Des. Art, Commun., vol. 296, no. 1, pp. 1383–1390, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/296/1/012020.

[5] A. Kurniawati, S. Wardani, and M. Asikin, “The effectiveness of the problem based learning model with a realistic mathematics education approach to problem solving ability,” Int. J. Res. Rev., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 491–497, 2023, doi: 10.52403/ijrr.20230156.

[6] R. Kenney, T. An, S. H. Kim, N. A. Uhan, J. S. Yi, and A. Shamsul, “Linear programming models: Identifying common errors in engineering students’ work with complex word problems,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 635–655, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10763-019-09980-5.

[7] G. Hall, “Integrating real-world numeracy applications and modelling into vocational courses,” Adults Learn. Math. An Int. J., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 53–67, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1068221.pdf.

[8] Y. D. Arthur, E. K. Owusu, S. Asiedu-Addo, and A. K. Arhin, “Connecting mathematics to real life problems: A teaching quality that improves students’ mathematics interest,” IOSR J. Res. Method Educ., vol. 8 Ver. II, no. 4, pp. 65–71, 2018, doi: 10.9790/7388-0804026571.

[9] I. W. Sumandya and I. W. E. Mahendra, “Developing vocation based mathematics e-module in linear program material,” Int. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1741–1752, 2020, doi: ) https://doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24i6/pr260168.

[10] N. Salsabila et al., “Validity of e-modules for teaching fractions through realistic mathematics education with the context of sacrifice worship (ibadah kurban),” Al Khawarizmi J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran Mat., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69–80, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/alkhawarizmi/article/view/22850/9703.

[11] C. H. Ng and A. Mazlini, “Integrating STEM education through Project- Based Inquiry Learning (PIL) in topic space among year one pupils,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 296, no. 1, pp. 0–6, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/296/1/012020.

[12] S. Haji, Y. Yumiati, and Z. Zamzaili, “Improving students’ productive disposition through realistic mathematics education with outdoor approach,” JRAMathEdu (Journal Res. Adv. Math. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 101–111, 2019, doi: 10.23917/jramathedu.v4i2.8385.

[13] D. Dhayanti, R. Johar, and C. M. Zubainur, “Improving students’ critical and creative thinking through realistic mathematics education using geometer’s sketchpad,” J. Res. Adv. Math. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 25, 2018, doi: 10.23917/jramathedu.v3i1.5618.

[14] D. A. Erlina and S. Sutarni, “Peningkatan aktivitas belajar siswa melalui pembelajaran Realistic Mathematics Education (RME),” J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 08, no. 01, pp. 454–463, 2024.

[15] M. F. Aprilianto and S. Sutarni, “Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis dengan pembelajaran matematika berbasis Realistic Mathematic Education (RME) pada siswa Sekolah Dasar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 807–815, 2023, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v7i1.4643.

[16] Y. Muhamad Saiful Bahri, “ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation,” Educ. Med. J., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 49–54, 2019, doi: 10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6.

[17] M. N. Sidek and A. Jamaludin, Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang: Universiti Putera Malaysia, 2005.

[18] M. Van Den Heuvel-panhuizen and P. Drijvers, Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, 2014.

[19] A. Renkl and K. Scheiter, “Studying visual displays: How to instructionally support learning,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 599–621, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9340-4.

[20] E. Bobek and B. Tversky, “Creating visual explanations improves learning,” Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2016, doi: 10.1186/s41235-016-0031-6.

[21] C. Buckley and C. Nerantzi, “Effective use of visual representation in research and teaching within higher education,” Int. J. Manag. Appl. Res., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 196–214, 2020, doi: 10.18646/2056.73.20-014.

[22] J. D. Russell, “The standard problem: Meaning and values in measurement and evaluation,” Educ. Meas. Issues Pract., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–10, 1974.

[23] B. W. Tuckman and M. A. Waheed, “Evaluating an individualized science program for community college students,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 489–495, 1981, doi: 10.1002/tea.3660180603.

[24] S. R. Achmad and Suparman, “Design of e-module with RME approach to improve the creative thinking ability of students,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 5228–5233, 2020.

[25] M. Divia and Y. Fitri, “Module development using the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) model for class X TAV students of SMK Negeri Padang [Pengembangan modul dengan menggunakan model Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) pada siswa kelas X TAV SMK Negeri Padang],” JANGKA J. Pendidik. Mat. Eksakta, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 49–57, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.31933/jangka.v1i2.489.

[26] Risnawati, Z. Amir, and D. Wahyuningsih, “The Development of Educational Game as Instructional Media to Facilitate Students’ Capabilities in Mathematical Problem Solving,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1028, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012130.

[27] R. E. N. Afrianti and A. Qohar, “Contextual-based e-module development on class XI linear programming topic [Pengembangan e-modul berbasis kontekstual pada materi program linear kelas XI],” J. Edukasi Mat. dan Sains, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 22, 2019, doi: 10.25273/jems.v7i1.5288.

[28] C. Hikayat, Suparman, Y. Hairun, and H. Suharna, “Design of realistic mathematics education approach to improve critical thinking skills,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 2232–2244, 2020, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080606.

[29] D. A. Putri, V. D. Susanti, and D. Apriandi, “Development of RME-based modules to improve the mathematical literacy skills of class XI SMK students [Pengembangan modul berbasis RME untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi matematika siswa kelas XI SMK],” Prima Magistra J. Ilm. Kependidikan, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 138–146, 2020, doi: 10.37478/jpm.v1i2.470.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-03

How to Cite

Rejeki, S., Adnan, M., Che Ahmad, C. N., & Murtiyasa, B. (2025). Validity Assessment of An Integrated Realistic Mathematics Education and Project-based Inquiry Learning Module. EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology, 12, 103-115. https://doi.org/10.37134/ejsmt.vol12.sp.10.2025

Most read articles by the same author(s)