Meaningful programming learning: A Student-Centered Technology Integration Model
Pembelajaran pengaturcaraan bermakna: Model Integrasi Teknologi Berpusatkan Pelajar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/bitara.vol15.1.4.2022Keywords:
Programming, Student Centered Learning, Technology IntegrationAbstract
Learning in computer programming involves the development of skills by understanding and applying the basic concepts of programming, designing algorithms, writing programs, understanding the syntax and logic of programs. The implementation of technology integration in programming courses has the potential to enhance the teaching and learning process in various ways. Technology integration does not only exposes students to technological developments to support learning materials, but also prepares students to work in the 21st century as well as engages their lives with tools that aid the effectiveness and effectiveness of performing tasks. This paper discusses a student-centered technology integration model that serves as a guide in the implementation of technology integration in meaningful programming learning at the tertiary level. This paper reviews learning models and related theories that underlie the implementation of technology integration in teaching and learning process. Just as learning theories provide a conceptual framework for explaining learning patterns that help find solutions to learning problems, theories in technology integration also aim to guide users to clarify important environments in their implementation. The discussion of the student-centered technology integration model aims to guide researchers to analyse student-centered learning problems in depth and devise strategies for the implementation of effective technology integration.
Downloads
References
Abu-Ayyash, E. A. S. & Hill, C. 2019. The impact of integrating technology into students’ presentations on peer evaluation in higher education. Education and Information Technologies. doi:10.1007/s10639-019-09936-w
Ashfahani, Z., Amla, M. S., Mohd Arif, I. & Ghavifekr, S. 2017. Promoting Meaningful Learning via Online Project-based Module. InternatIonal Journal on e-learning and HIgher Education 6(5): 71–95.
Attallah, B. 2017. Visualizing Computer Programming in a Computer-based Simulated Environment. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 8(8): 369–378.
Banerjee, G. & Murthy, S. 2018. CuVIS: An interactive tool for instructors to create effective customized learning designs with visualizations. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 34(2): 95–116.
Betül, Ş. T., Çubukçu, Z. & İnci, T. 2019. A Holistic View to Barriers to Technology Integration in Education. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry 10(4): 439–461. doi:10.17569/tojqi.613969
Birisci, S. & Kul, U. 2019. Predictors of technology integration self-efficacy beliefs of preservice teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology 10(1): 75–93. doi:10.30935/cet.512537
Bond, M., Zawacki-richter, O. & Nichols, M. 2019. Revisiting five decades of educational technology research: A content and authorship analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology 50(1): 12–63. doi:10.1111/bjet.12730
Caldero, A. & Macphail, A. 2019. A student-centred digital technology approach: The relationship between intrinsic motivation, learning climate and academic achievement of physical education pre-service teachers. European Physical Education Review. doi:10.1177/1356336X19850852
Chipamaunga, S. & Prozesky, D. 2019. How students experience integration and perceive development of the ability to integrate learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education 24(1): 65–84. doi:10.1007/s10459-018-9850-1
Coleman, T. E. & Money, A. G. 2020. Student-centred digital game – based learning: a conceptual framework and survey of the state of the art.
Davis, F. D. 1986. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information System: Theory and Result. Sloan School of Management. Massachuset of Technology.
Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Fadilla, L. & Zamri, M. 2019. Tahap Pengetahuan, Kesediaan dan Sikap Guru Bahasa Melayu Sekolah Rendah dalam Melaksanakan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Peta Pemikiran. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia 44(01): 37–44. doi:10.17576/jpen-2019-44.01-05
Ghazali, N., Nordin, M. S., Abdullah, A., Fauzi, A. & Ayub, M. 2020. The Relationship between Students’ MOOC -efficacy and Meaningful Learning. Asian Journal of University Education 16(3): 89–101.
Hasnuddin Bin Ab Rahman, Norfaizuryana Binti Zainal & Nor Azzarahton Binti Ab Karim. 2015. Keberkesanan Penggunaan ICT di dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Islam Bagi Sekolah Kebangsaan Desa Pandan Kuala Lumpur. Proceeding of IC-ITS 2015 e-ISBN:978-967-0850-07-8.
Hamzeh, W., Mershad, K. & Vetohin, S. 2019. Integrating Technology into Higher Education: A Case Study in Lebanon. Journal of Technology and Science Education 9(3): 442–457.
Harjali, H. 2017. Meaning of Developing Student Centered Classroom Environment. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia 6(2): 134–140. doi:10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v6i2.10245
Hartman, R. J., Townsend, M. B. & Jackson, M. 2019. Educators’ perceptions of technology integration into the classroom: A descriptive case study. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning 12(3): 236–249. doi:10.1108/JRIT-03-2019-0044
Hassad, R. A. 2014. The status of reform in statistics education: A focus on the introductory course. ICOTS9 Contributed Paper Proceedings, hlm. Vol. 9, 1–4.
Hoidn, S. 2017. Constructivist Foundations and Common Design Principles of Student-Centered Learning Environments. In: Student-Centered Learning Environments in Higher Education Classrooms. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, hlm. 23–103. doi:10.1057/978-1-349-94941-0
Hughes, C., Toohey, S. & Hatherly, S. 1992. Developing learning-centred trainers and tutors. Journal of Studies in Continuing Education, 14 (1), 14-27.
Imam Koning, Sajastanah, Mohd Nizam Nasrifan, Noor Whida Md. Junus, and Norshahida Nor Azmi. 2021. “Integrasi Aktiviti Muzikal Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Matematik: Satu Kajian Literatur.” Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI 14: 92–102.
Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K. & Yacci, M. 1993. Structural knowledge: techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kumlu, Sarp Tahsin, and Özkul Emrah. 2021. “The Effect of the Usage of Virtual Reality in Tourism Education on Learning Motivation.” In In C. Cobanoglu, & V. Della Corte (Eds.), Advances in Global Services and Retail Management, , 1–16.
Laili Farhana, M. I. & Maizatul Hayati, M. Y. 2014. Kreativiti dan kemahiran kanak-kanak dalam mereka bentuk permainan digital bagi tujuan pembelajaran. Journal of ICT in Education 1(1): 87–102.
Latypova, L. A., Polyakova, O. V. & Latypov, N. R. 2016. University students’ peer assessment in the language environment: From rote to meaningful learning. Mathematics Education 11(6): 1911–1917.
Mcclure, J. & Pilgrim, J. 2021. Implementing a 1: 1 technology program in a rural, public school: A study of perceptions of technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 0(0): 1–15. doi:10.1080/15391523.2020.1852455
Mohammed Ruman & Prakasha, G. S. 2017. Application of Technology Integration (TIM) in teach and learning of Secondary School Science Subjects. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 22(12), 24-26.
Mohd Khairulnizam, Ramlie, and Mohamad Ali Ahmad Zamzuri. 2021. “Kesan Tutor Hologram Dalam Bentuk Karakter Robot Manusia Terhadap Pengalaman Pelajar (Lx).” Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI 14: 11–21.
Mohd Noor, S., M. Mohd Noor, and T Mohammad. 2021. “Persepsi Pelajar Terhadap Pembelajaran Dalam Talian Kursus Pidato Dan Debat Arab Ketika Pandemik COVID-19.” Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI 14(1): 28–38.
Muhammad Yaumi. 2011. Integrasi Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi dalam Pembelajaran. Lantera Pendidikan, 14(1), 88-102.
Naujokaitiene, J., Tamoliune, G., Volungeviciene, A. & Duart, J. M. 2020. Using learning analytics to engage students: Improving teaching practices through informed interactions. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research 9(2): 231–244. doi:10.7821/naer.2020.7.561
Omar, A. 2016. Integrasi Teknologi Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Kesusasteraan Melayu Mempertingkatkan Keyakinan Dan Keberhasilan Guru Semasa Latihan Mengajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI 9: 13–25.
Puntularb, Pichaporn, Chakrit Yippikun, and Preecha Pinchunsri. 2021. “The Characteristics and Self-Regulation of Undergraduate Students in Online English Learning: A Case Study of A Private University in Thailand. International Journal of Higher Education 10(7): 34.
Qian, Y. & Lehman, J. 2018. Using technology to support teaching computer science: A study with middle school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14(12). doi:10.29333/ejmste/94227
Qian, Y., Yan, P. & Zhou, M. 2019. Using Data to Understand Difficulties of Learning to Program. CompEd ’19, hlm. 185–191. doi:10.1145/3300115.3309521
Razak, A. Ahmad. 2011. Kepentingan Kemajuan Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi. http://www.flashkitech.com/?p=501 [10 Oktober 2017].
Roberts, D. 2019. Higher education lectures: From passive to active learning via imagery? Active Learning in Higher Education 20(1): 63–77. doi:10.1177/1469787417731198
Shaw, R. 2019. The Learning Performance of Different Knowledge Map Construction Methods and Learning Styles Moderation for Programming Language Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research 56(8): 1407–1429. doi:10.1177/0735633117744345
Smith, S. & Chan, S. 2017. Collaborative and Competitive Video Games for Teaching Computing in Higher Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology 26(4): 438–457. doi:10.1007/s10956-017-9690-4
Stevenson, M., Hedberg, J., Highfield, K. & Diao, M. 2015. Visualizing Solutions: Apps as Cognitive Stepping-Stones in the Learning Process. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning Volume 13(5): 366–379.
Taiwo, A. A. 2016. Theoritical Modelling to Explain Lecturers use of Educational Support System for Teaching in University-based Library Schools in Nigeria: Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). University of Nebraska – Lincoln. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 14-16.
Tan, M. & Hew, K. F. 2016. Incorporating meaningful gamification in a blended learning research methods class: Examining student learning, engagement, and affective outcomes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technolog 32(5): 19–34.
Thannimalai, R. & Raman, A. 2018. Principals technology leadership and teachers technology integration in the 21st century classroom. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology 9(2): 177–187.
Thulasimani Munohsamy. 2014. Integrasi Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi dalam Pendidikan. Universiti Teknologi Brunei.
Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen, T. & Sointu, E. 2019. Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education. British Journal of Educational Technology 50(3): 1189–1209. doi:10.1111/bjet.12748
Velde, Robin van der, Nadine Blignaut – van Westrhenen, Nanon H.M. Labrie, and Marjolein B.M. Zweekhorst. 2020. “‘The Idea Is Nice… but Not for Me’: First-Year Students’ Readiness for Large-Scale ‘Flipped Lectures’—What (de)Motivates Them?” Higher Education.
Vergara, D., Extremera, J., Rubio, M. P. & D, P. 2019. Meaningful Learning Through Virtual Reality Learning Environments: A Case Study in Materials Engineering. Applied Sciences 9(4625).
Webster, L. & Murphy, D. 2008. Enhancing Learning through Technology: Challenges and Responses. In R. Kwan, R. Fox, F. T. Chan, & P. Tsang (Eds). Enhancing Learning through Technology: Research on Emerging Technologies and Pedagogies, 1-16. Singapore: World Scientific.
Wieking, Blake A. 2016. “Technology Integration and Student Learning Motivation.” Northwestern College, Iowa NWCommons.
Wiwik Hartati. 2011. Pemanfaatan ICT dalam Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Dosen. Universiti Mohammadiyah Prof. DR. Hamka. Jakarta.
Wilson, S. M. & Peterson, P. L. 2006. Theories of Learning and Teaching What Do They Mean for Educators? Theories of Learning and Teaching. National Education
Woodbridge, J. 2004. Technology Integration as A Transformation Teaching Strategy. http://www.techlearning.com. [2 November 2017].
Yaki, A. A., Saat, R. M., Renuka, V. & Zulnaidi, H. 2019. Enhancing Science Achievement Utilising An Integrated Stem Approach. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction 16(1): 181–205.
Yang, D., Baldwin, S. J., Using, S. J., Yang, D. & Baldwin, S. J. 2020. Using Technology to Support Student Learning in an Integrated STEM Learning Environment. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science 4(1): 1–11.
Yi, Soyul, and Youngjun Lee. 2018. “An Educational System Design to Support Learning Transfer from Block-Based Programming Language to Text-Based Programming Language.” International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology 8(4–2): 1571–76.
