Aplikasi Perisian Visualisasi Tiga Dimensi dalam Pembelajaran Sains Biologi: Implikasi terhadap Pelajar Berbeza Keupayaan Spatial
Keywords:
Visualisasi Tiga Dimensi, Realiti Maya Web, Keupayaan Spatial, Sains BiologiAbstract
Tujuan kajian ini adalah bagi mengenalpasti kesan perbezaan tahap keupayaan spatial pelajar terhadap prestasi kognitif dalam pembelajaran subjek biologi sel dengan menggunakan perisian visualisasi tiga dimensi. Perisian visualisasi tiga dimensi dihasilkan dengan menggunakan teknologi realiti maya dalam persekitaran web. Prestasi kognitif diukur dengan menggunakan ujian pencapaian. Reka bentuk kajian kuasi eksperimen digunakan dalam kajian ini. Seramai enam puluh satu orang pelajar daripada sebuah universiti telah dipilih sebagai sampel kajian yang pemilihan adalah berdasarkan kepada kumpulan kelas sedia ada. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan tiada perbezaan yang signifikan bagi pelajar berbeza keupayaan yang mengikuti pembelajaran dengan perisian visualisasi tiga dimensi. Hasil kajian ini menunjukkan perisian visualisasi tiga dimensi dapat membantu pelajar berkeupayaan spatial rendah untuk mempelajari subjek sains biologi seiring dengan pelajar berkeupayaan spatial tinggi. Dapatan menunjukkan bahawa teknologi realiti mungkin berpotensi untuk digunakan dalam pembelajaran bidang berorientasikan spatial dalam disiplin sains biologi.
Downloads
References
Andersen, L. (2014). Visual–Spatial Ability: Important in STEM, Ignored in Gifted Education. Roeper Review, 36(April 2015), 114–121. doi:10.1080/02783193.201 4.884198.
Alters, S., & Alters, B. (2006). Biology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Arikh, M. A. P., Asmussen, M. A. R. Y. R., Rubaker, L. I. B., Alomon, C. A. S., Akamoto, K. Y. S., Venhouse, R. A. E., Amaser, M. A. S. D. (2004). Three Dimensional Virtual Reality Model of the Normal Female Pelvic Floor, 32(2), 292–296.
Berney, S., Bétrancourt, M., Molinari, G., & Hoyek, N. (2015). How spatial abilities and dynamic visualizations interplay when learning functional anatomy with 3D anatomical models. Anatomical Sciences Education, 00, n/a–n/a. doi:10.1002/ ase.1524.
Bodner, G.M. & Guay, R.B. (1997). The purdue visualization of rotation test. The Chemical Educator, 2 (4), 1-17.
Chittaro, L., & Ranon, R. (2007). Web3D technologies in learning, education and training: Motivations, issues, opportunities. Computers & Education, 49, 3–18.
Cohen, A. R., Lohani, S., & Manjila, S. (2013). Virtual reality simulation: basic concepts and use in endoscopic neurosurgery training, 1235–1244. doi:10.1007/ s00381-013-2139-z.
Demaree, D., Stonebraker, S., Zhao, W., & Bao, L. (2005). Virtual reality in introductory physics laboratories. Virtual Reality, 93–97.
Grabow, R. (2003). The relationship of visual spatial ability performance in solving stochiometric problems in a high school chemistry class. Disertasi doktor falsafah tidak diterbitkan. California State University, Long Beach CA.
Guillot, A., Champely, S., Batier, C., Thiriet, P. et al. (2007). Relationship between spatial abilities, mental rotation and functional anatomy learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12, 491-507.
Hay, T.A. (1996). Spatial abilities and the effects of computer animation on short -term and long-term comprehension. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14 (2), 139-155.
Hassinger, J. P., Dozois, E. J., Holubar, S. D., Camp, J. C., Farley, D. R., Fidler, J. L., Larson, D. W. (2010). Virtual Pelvic Anatomy Simulator: A Pilot Study of Usability and Perceived Effectiveness. Journal of Surgical Research, 161(1), 23– 27. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.06.016.
Hegarty, M. (2007). The Role of Spatial Thinking in Undergraduate Science Education. Thinking, 1–34.
Hegarty, M., Keehner, M., Khooshabeh, P., & Montello, D. R. (2009). How spatial abilities enhance, and are enhanced by, dental education. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 61–70. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.006.
Hoffler, T. N. (2010a). Spatial Ability: Its Influence on Learning with Visualizations - a Meta-Analytic Review. Educational Psychology Review, 245–269. doi: 10.1007/ s10648-010-9126-7.
Hoffler, T. N. (2010b). Spatial Ability: Its Influence on Learning with Visualizations - a Meta-Analytic Review. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 245–269. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9126-7
Hoffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2011). Computers in Human Behavior The role of spatial ability in learning from instructional animations – Evidence for an ability-as compensator hypothesis, 27, 209–216. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.042.
Huang, H., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S. (2010). Computers & Education Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.014.
Id, A., Author, C., & Kelc, R. (2012). Zygote Body: A New Interactive 3-Dimensional Didactical Tool for Teaching Anatomy Zygote Body: A New Interactive 3-Dimensional Didactical Tool for Teaching Anatomy.
Jang, S. (2010). From vesalius to virtual reality: How embodied cognition facilitates the visualization of anatomy. Disertasi doktor falsafah tidak diterbitkan. Columbia University, Columbia.
Jang, S., Black, J. B., & Jyung, R. W. (n.d.). Embodied Cognition and Virtual Reality in Learning to Visualize Anatomy Research Design and Questions, 2326–2331.
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1985). Mental models. In A. Aitken, and J. Slack (Eds.), Issues in cognitive modelling. London: LEA Publishers.
Karp, G. (2008). Cell and molecular biology. Hoboken,New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Kaufman, S. B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity? Intelligence, 35(3), 211–223. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2006.07.009.
Keehner, M. M.,Tendick, F., Meng, M. V., Anwar, H. P., Hegarty, M., et al. (2004). Spatial ability, experience, and skill in laparoscopic surgery. The American Journal of Surgery, 188, 71–75.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Lee, E. A. L., & Wong, K. W. (2014). Learning with desktop virtual reality: Low spatial ability learners are more positively affected. Computers and Education, 79, 49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.010.
Lee, E. A., Wai, K., & Che, C. (2010). Computers & Education How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1424–1442. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.006.
Lee, E. A., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2009). Educational Values of Virtual Reality : The Case of Spatial Ability, 991–995.
Liner, M, S. (2012). Spatial Ability and Achievement in High School Physics, (August).
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual- coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389–401.
Meneghetti, C., Gyselinck, V., Pazzaglia, F., & Beni, R. De. (2009). Individual differences in spatial text processing: High spatial ability can compensate for spatial working memory interference. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 577–589. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.07.007.
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033.
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Kwok, O., Cifuentes, L., & Davis, T. J. (2012). The learner characteristics, features of desktop 3D virtual reality environments, and college chemistry instruction: A structural equation modeling analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 551–568. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.004.
Mikropoulus, T. A., Katsikis, A., Nikolou, E., & Tsakalis, P. (2003). Virtual environment in biology teaching. Journal of Biological Education, 37 (4), 176-181. Mnguni, L. E. (2014). The theoretical cognitive process of visualization for science education. SpringerPlus, 3(1), 184. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-184.
Münzer, S., Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2009). Learning from multimedia presentations: Facilitation function of animations and spatial abilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 481–485. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.05.001.
Nguyen, N., Nelson, A. J., & Wilson, T. D. (2012). Computer Visualizations: Factors That Influence Spatial Anatomy Comprehension, 000. doi: 10.1002/ase.1258.
Nikolou, E., Mikropoulus, T. A., & Katsikis, A. (2004). Virtual realities in biology teaching. Dalam M. Bevan (Ed.). Proceeding of the international conference ‘virtual reality in educational and teaching (pp. 59-63).
Sanchez, A., Barreiro, J. S., & Maojo, V. (2000). Design of virtual reality systems for education: A cognitive approach. Education and Information Technologies, 5 (4), 345-362.
Stieff, M., & Uttal, D. (2015). How Much Can Spatial Training Improve STEM Achievement? Educational Psychology Review. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9304-8.
Urhahne, D., Nick, S., & Schanze, S. (2008). The effect of three-dimensional simulations on the understanding of chemical structures and their properties. Research in Science Education, 39, 495–513.
Vavra, K. L., Janjic-Watrich, V., Loerke, K., Phillips, L. M., Norris, S. P., & Macnab, J. (2005). Visualization in science education. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 41(1), 22–30. doi: 10.1145/1330598.1330687
Wandersee, J.H., Fisher, K. M., & Moody, D. E. (2002). The Nature of biology knowledge. Dalam K. M. Fisher, J. H. Wandersee, & D. E. Moody (Eds.), Mapping biology knowledge (pp. 25-38). Kluwer Academic Publishers. New York.
Wang, H. (2007). The comparative efficacy of 2D- versus 3D-based media design for influencing spatial visualization skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1943– 1957. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.004.
Winn, W., & Jackson, R. (1999) Fourteen propositions about educational uses of virtual reality. Educational Technology, 39 (4), 5-14
