Correlation Between Students’ Entrance Exit Survey Results and their Program Outcome (PO) Scores

Authors

  • Rohaiza Baharudin Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Permatang Pauh Campus, 13500 Seberang Prai, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Asmalia Zanal Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Permatang Pauh Campus, 13500 Seberang Prai, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Anis Diyana Rosli Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Permatang Pauh Campus, 13500 Seberang Prai, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Ida Rahayu Mohamed Noordin Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Permatang Pauh Campus, 13500 Seberang Prai, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Juliana Md Sharif Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Permatang Pauh Campus, 13500 Seberang Prai, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Mohd Hussaini Abbas Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Permatang Pauh Campus, 13500 Seberang Prai, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol16.1.1.2026

Keywords:

Programme Outcome Assessment, Entrance-Exit Survey (EES), Outcome-Based Education (OBE), Student Learning Analytics

Abstract

This study explores the correlation between students’ Entrance-Exit Survey (EES) results and Programme Outcome (PO) scores in the Electrical Measurement course at Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). Conducted over four semesters with 184 diploma students in Electrical Engineering, the study utilized a five-point Likert scale to assess students’ self-rated understanding and mastery of course outcomes. The EES, administered via the UFUTURE platform, supports Outcome-Based Education (OBE) by capturing learning progress from course entry to completion. Survey data and continuous assessments were mapped to the Course Outcome – Programme Outcome (CO–PO) matrix and analyzed using Jamovi statistical software. The findings indicate a positive correlation between students’ survey responses and their PO scores, suggesting that the EES is a reliable tool for evaluating teaching effectiveness and student achievement. This correlation reinforces the value of integrating digital feedback systems into engineering education to enhance curriculum alignment and graduate readiness in response to Industry 4.0 demands.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abedin, N. F. Z., Taib, J. M., & Jamil, H. M. T. (2014). Comparative Study on Course Evaluation Process: Students’ and Lecturers’ Perceptions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 380–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.01.1436

Ahmed Ghaly, S. M. (2020). Indirect Evaluation of Program Educational Objectives and Student Outcomes for Engineering Programs: A Case Study. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 10(5), 6209–6213. https://doi.org/10.48084/ETASR.375

Aiko M. (2018). The relationships between the accuracy of self-evaluation, Kanji proficiency and the learning environment for adolescent Japanese heritage language learners. Journal of Language and Education, 4(2), 6-23. https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2018-4-2-6-23

Mohd Noor, N.A., Muhamad, N.S., Alias, R., Alias, A., Rosli, S. H. (2024). Analysis of program outcomes attainment for diploma in civil engineering at Universiti Teknologi MARA Pahang. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(3), 1673–1682. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26996

Ayob, A., Abd Wahab, H. F., Arsad. N., A.Bakar, A. A., & Husain, H. (2011). Assessment of student program outcomes through a comprehensive exit strategy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.006

Balasubramani, R., & Chiplunkar, N. N. (2017). Attainment of programme outcomes through course outcomes in

outcome based education: A case study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 31(2), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2017/v31i2/119555

Bansal, S., Bansal, A., & Dalrymple, O. (2015). Outcome-based education model for computer science education. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 28(2), 113–121. https://journaleet.in/index.php/jeet/article/view/334

Chandna., V. K. (2015). Course outcome assessment and improvement on weak student. 2015 IEEE 3rd International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), Amritsar, India, 38-40, https://doi.org/10.1109/MITE.2015.7375284

Chan, M. K., Wang, C. C., & B. Arbai, A. A. (2022). Development of dynamic OBE model to quantify student performance. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(5), 1293–1306. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22520

Dargham, J. A., Chekima, A., Yin, R. C. K., & Wong, F. (2013). A direct assessment method of the achievement of the program outcomes from the courses outcomes. 2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Engineering Education: Aligning Engineering Education with Industrial Needs for Nation Development, ICEED, 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2013.6908317

Desai, S. R., Mane, P. K., Hegde, V. N., & Mamatha, M. N. (2017). An approach for evaluating program educational objectives using indirect method. 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), Bangalore, India, 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITE.2017.00031

Hairi, N., Mohd Affandi, H., & Mohamad Nasri, N. (2019). Identifying instruments to measure programme educational objectives (PEO) achievement in Malaysia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9A), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.13189/UJER.2019.071616

Kristianto, H., Gandajaya, L., Arfin, A., Prasetyo, S., Susanti, R. F., & Adithia, M. T. (2026). Evaluating student learning outcomes: A comparative analysis of direct and indirect measurement. Quality Assurance in Education. 34(2), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-02-2025-0051

Lavanya, C., & Murthy, J. N. (2022). Assessment and Attainment of Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 35(4), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.16920/JEET/2022/V35I4/22109

Lui, M. C. G., & Shum, C. (2012). Outcome-based education and student learning in managerial accounting in Hong Kong. Journal of Case Studies in Accreditation and Assessment, 2,1-13.

Luzan, P., Titova, O., Kurok, R., & Mosia, I. (2021). The methodology for assessment of engineering students outcomes. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Modern Electrical and Energy Systems (MEES) Kremenchuk, Ukraine,1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/MEES52427.2021.9598666

Nayak, S. G. (2019). Analysis of knowledge accomplishment of an undergraduate engineering course based on attainment of course outcomes. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 10(1), 248–254. http://iaeme.com/Home/issue/IJMET?Volume=10&Issue=1http://iaeme.com

Nugent, J. H., & Crews, D. E. (2013). A case study in direct and indirect assessments of student learning outcomes: is there one best method? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2248873

Othman, N., Md Sin, N.D., Muhamad, N.A., Zahid, F.S. (2025). Implementation of outcome based education toward ETAC accreditation in diploma in electrical engineering (electronic). Jurnal Kejuruteraan, 37(5), 2257–2266. https://doi.org/10.17576/jkukm-2025-37(5)-18

Othman, N., Saat, M.E.H., Muhamad, N.A., Anuar, N.H.K., & Majid, M. A. (2024). The development an outcome base education (OBE) system for measuring student programme attainment. Journal of Computing Research and Innovation, 9(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.24191/JCRINN.V9I2.472

Pasi, B. N., & Dhamak, P. (2025). Review of Industry 4.0 and higher education: a paradigm shift toward digital transformation. Asian Education and Development Studies, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-01-2025-0018

Premalatha, K. (2019). Course and program outcomes assessment methods in outcome-based education: A review. Journal of Education, 199(3), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057419854351

Puriwat Assoc, W., Tripopsakul Asst, S., & author, corresponding. (2020). Preparing for Industry 4.0 -- Will youths have enough essential skills?: An evidence from Thailand. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1337a

Rajak, A., Shrivastava, A., & Tripathi, A. (2019). An Approach to Evaluate Program Outcomes and Program Educational Objectives through Direct and Indirect Assessment Tools. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(23), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i23.11018

Thakkar, R.R., & Landge, I. (2022). Attainment of course outcome and programme outcome: direct and indirect method. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.4026446

Sharma, A. (2025). Direct and indirect evaluation strategies for Course Outcome (CO)-Program Outcome (PO) attainment of engineering physics course. Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy, 2(2), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.70232/JREP.V2I2.60

Singh, D., & Tilak, G. (2020). Implementation of Education Model 4.0: Developing Industry 4.0 skills in graduates engineers for improving employability skills. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(2), 601–613. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8268

Wahab, H. F. A., Ayob, A., Zaki, W. M. D. W., Hussain, H., Hussain, A., & Mokri, S. S. (2011). Program Outcomes Measurement and Assessment Processes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2011.05.008

Mohammad, A.W., & Zaharim, A. (2012). Programme outcomes assessment models in engineering faculties. Asian Social Science, 8(16), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n16p115

Wong, G. K. W & Cheung, H.Y. (2011). Outcome-based teaching and learning in computer science education at sub-degree level. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 1(1), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSN.2011.6013796

Downloads

Published

2026-06-03

How to Cite

Baharudin, R., Zanal, A., Rosli, A. D., Mohamed Noordin, I. R., Md Sharif, J., & Abbas, M. H. (2026). Correlation Between Students’ Entrance Exit Survey Results and their Program Outcome (PO) Scores. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 16(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol16.1.1.2026