Analysis of Literacy Process of Learning Science in Elementary School: A Case Study in Jepara

Authors

  • Setiyawan Mustakul Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muria Kudus, Central Java, Indonesia
  • Sumaji Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muria Kudus, Central Java, Indonesia
  • Mochamad Widjanarko Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muria Kudus, Central Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol13.2.8.2023

Keywords:

Analysis, Literacy, Science Learning, Elementary School

Abstract

The study aims to examine students' interest in learning science, categorizing it into high, moderate, and low levels among fourth-grade students at SD Negeri 01 Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara. The purpose is to describe and analyze the literacy process in science learning for these students. The research employs a qualitative case study method involving observations, interviews, and documentation. In elementary education, literacy encompasses the development of skills in writing, reading, arithmetic, speaking, and problem-solving, all of which are essential for everyday life. The subjects of this research include fourth-grade students, their teachers, and the school principal at SD N 01 Raguklampitan. One of the ways to foster literacy is through science education. The findings reveal that students with high interest (subjects 1 and 2) enjoy science lessons, those with moderate interest (subjects 3 and 4) are focused during lessons, and those with low interest (subjects 5 and 6) participate but struggle to understand much of the material.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anggraeni, A. (2019). Urgensi penerapan pendekatan konstruktivisme pada pembelajaran PKn SD untuk meningkatkan minat belajar siswa. Jurnal PPKn & Hukum, 14(2), 18-37.

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 134, 252.

Çakıroğlu, A. (2018). The language acquisition approaches and the development of literacy skills in children. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(2), 201-206. https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/747

Fikrat-Wevers, S., van Steensel, R., & Arends, L. (2021). Effects of family literacy programs on the emergent literacy skills of children from low-SES families: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 91(4), 577-613. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321998075

Goodrich, J. M., Lonigan, C. J., & Farver, J. M. (2013). Do early literacy skills in children's first language promote development of skills in their second language? An experimental evaluation of transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 414-426.

Hastie, P., & Hay, P. (2012). Qualitative approaches. In Research methods in physical education and youth sport (pp. 79-94). Routledge.

Hidayat, I., Naziha, N., & Purnama, A. D. (2022). Increased Learning Outcomes in Effective Learning Models Application According to the Plomp. JLE: Journal of Literate of English Education Study Program, 3(02), 41-45.

Hyun, J., Ediger, R., & Lee, D. (2017). Students' Satisfaction on Their Learning Process in Active Learning and Traditional Classrooms. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 108-118.

Kartikasari, E., & Nuryasana, E. (2022). School literacy movement program in elementary school, Indonesia: Literature review. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 16(3), 336-341. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v16i3.20383

Khakima, L. N., Marlina, L., & Zahra, S. F. A. (2021, December). Penerapan Literasi Numerasi dalam Pembelajaran Siswa MI/SD. In Prosiding SEMAI: Seminar Nasional PGMI (Vol. 1, pp. 775-792).

Kristiyaningrum, R. K., & Ismanto, B. (2020). The evaluation of school literacy movement program in secondary school. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 53(3), 266-275. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v53i1.24624

Leasa, M., Corebima, A. D., & Batlolona, J. R. (2020). The effect of learning styles on the critical thinking skills in natural science learning of elementary school students. Ilkogretim Online, 19(4), 2086-2097. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.763449

Ledley, F. D., & Holt, S. S. (2014). Learning objectives and content of science curricula for undergraduate management education. Journal of Management Education, 38(1), 86-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562912462137

Maxwell, J. A. (2018). Collecting qualitative data: A realist approach. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection, 19-32.

Nittrouer, S., & Caldwell-Tarr, A. (2016). Language and literacy skills in children with cochlear implants: Past and present findings. Pediatric cochlear implantation: Learning and the brain, 177-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2788-3_11

Purwo, S. (2017). Peran gerakan literasi sekolah dalam pembelajaran kreatif-produktif di sekolah dasar. Karya Ilmiah Dosen, 3(1), 85-103.

Puspitasari, A. D., & Ana, R. F. R. (2023). Analisis Minat Belajar Siswa pada Pembelajaran Daring Siswa Kelas IVA SD Negeri 1 Tertek Tulungagung. Jurnal Simki Pedagogia, 6(1), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.29407/jsp.v6i1.200

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suhaida, D., & Syarifah, F. (2019). Analisis model pembelajaran berbasis pendidikan karakter untuk membentuk karakter siswa. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 16(2), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v16i2.21757

Suharninuk, D. R., Fajrie, N., & Kurniati, D. (2023). Student Collaboration Skills Through Problem-Based Learning Models in Learning Science Electrical Circuit Material at Elementary School. Uniglobal Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 46-53.

Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. L. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. John Wiley & Sons.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-25

How to Cite

Mustakul, S., Sumaji, & Widjanarko, M. (2023). Analysis of Literacy Process of Learning Science in Elementary School: A Case Study in Jepara. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 13(2), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol13.2.8.2023