The Challenges and Needs Analysis of Developing a Theory-Enabled Instructional Blog for MUET Writing Task 2
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol13.1.3.2025Keywords:
challenges, instructional tool, MUET Writing Task 2, needs, theory-enabled, WeCWIAbstract
The Malaysian University English Test (MUET) holds significant importance as it serves as a crucial examination for assessing the English proficiency of students aiming to gain entry into local universities. Recent studies and reports from the Malaysian Examination Council have brought attention to the challenges faced by English as a Second Language (ESL) students in MUET Writing Task 2, encompassing linguistic competence, task fulfillment, and anxiety issues in completing written tasks. In order to overcome these challenges, educators often develop innovative approaches like online learning materials grounded in theoretical frameworks to enhance students' writing skills. When determining a suitable theoretical framework as the foundation for online learning, several elements must be considered, such as how effectively it addresses the challenges. In writing, Web-based Cognitive Writing Instruction (WeCWI) stands out as a suitable option since it fosters structured guidance and strategies for improving linguistic competence, achieving task fulfillment, and alleviating anxiety issues in completing written tasks. Thus, the primary aim of this research is to thoroughly examine the difficulties encountered by ESL students in MUET Writing Task 2 and emphasise the necessity for an instructional blog to provide them with essential support. To achieve this, data was meticulously gathered through an online questionnaire distributed among 84 respondents from a private higher learning institution in Malaysia. The collected data was thoroughly analysed using descriptive statistics with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 21.0). The analysis revealed the presence of a statistically significant score of challenges ESL students face in MUET Writing Task 2, highlighting the critical need for developing an effective instructional blog to enhance their proficiency in this area. Future research efforts should focus on designing and creating a theory-enabled instructional blog tailored to address the nuances of MUET Writing Task 2 to provide comprehensive support to ESL students. Additionally, this study's sample size and demographics should be expanded to larger and more diverse samples to enhance validity and reliable results across institutions with different demographics and educational cultures.
Downloads
References
Abuhassna, H., Adnan, M., & Awae, F. (2024). Exploring the synergy between instructional design models and learning theories: A systematic literature review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(2), ep499. https://doi.org/xxxx
Ahn, H.-D., Choi, J.-Y., Jeon, M., Kim, S., & Hwang, J. (2022). Morphological processing of a Korean nominal suffix -tul by Korean speakers and Chinese L2 learners. 언어학 연구, 59, 47–75.
Aidit, N., Fauzi, S., & Perry, E. (2023). Investigation of second language writing anxiety among ESL students in public university. International Journal of Service Management and Sustainability, 8(1), 73 – 92.
Alias, M., Raof, A., & Abdullah, T. (2021). Teaching CEFR- aligned writing to young learners: Practices and voices of teachers. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. &Hum. 29 (S3): 351-368 .
Alied, N., Alkubaidi, M., & Bahanshal, D. (2022). The use of blogs on EFL students’ writing and engagement in a Saudi Private School. Journal of Education and Learning; 11(4).
Aljafen, B. S. (2023). Blogging as a learning tool: A study of writing gains in an EFL settings. World Journal of English Language, 13(3), Special Issue.
Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929.
Alsamadani, H. A. (2018). The effectiveness of using online blogging for students’ individual and group writing. International Education Studies, 11(1).
Alsubaie, A., & Madini , A. (2018). The effect of using blogs to enhance the writing skill of English language learners at a Saudi University. Global Journal of Educational Studies, 4(1).
Amreet , K., & Harun, R. (2019). Peer instruction in a flipped learning environment: Investigating ESL students’ critical thinking performance in argumentative essay writing. Journal of English Education and Development.
Annand, D. (2019). Limitations of the community of inquiry framework. International of E- Learning and Distance Education, 34(2).
Aziz, N., Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. (2019). Using social media to enhance ESL writing skills among Gen-Z learners. Creative Education, 10(12), 3020-3027. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce. 2019 1012226.
Azlan, N., & Yunus, M. (2020). Undergraduates’ perceptions of social networking sites to improve English writing skills in Malaysia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 329-351.
Barua, N. M. (2022). Blogging as a tool to enable students to write more effectively. Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 25(3), 60-80. 10.5782/2223-2621.2022.25.3.60.
Chen, C., Mah, B., & Hassan, N. (2025). Improving argumentative writing performance among chinese EFL postgraduates using WeCWI-enabled tencent docs. ESTEEM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(1), 17-31.
Chiau, L. G. (2019). Action Research: The efficiency of adopting voice note recording for MUET speaking activity. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal, 3(1), 17-27.
Chowdhury, M., Behak, F., Hassan , M., & Sultana, T. (2022). Investigating the use of blog for teaching writing courses to undergraduates. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 10(1): 17-36.
Din, W., Suyansah Swanto, Latip, N., & Ismail, I. (2021). The process approach to the teaching of writing: Focus on process rather than a product. Journal Of Information System and Technology Management, 6(23), 63-71.
Education, M. o. (2013). Executive Summary Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Retrieved from https://www.pmo.gov.my/wp-
Edward, E., Kamlun, K., Din, W., & Pudin, C. (2021). Reading difficulties among malaysian undergraduate ESL learners: A preliminary study. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 6(43), 62-70.
Elega, A., & Ozad, B. (2017). New Media Scholarship In Africa: An Evaluation Of Africa-Focused Blog Related Research From 2006 To 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0659-4.
International Journal of Humanities, Philosophy and Language. (2023) Affective factors and writing performance of students in Paper 4 of the Malaysian University English Test in Malaysia. International Journal of Humanities, Philosophy and Language, 6. 13-29. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJHPL.623002.
Ghani, K., & Paramalingam, M. (2023). A study on the methodology employed by teachers in relation to the undergraduate’s grammatical errors in the MUET extended writing. Globus An International Journal of Management & IT A Refereed Research Journal, 15.
Ghani, K., & Shing, S. (2019). The relationship between teacher factors and malaysian undergraduates’ grammatical errors in writing. IDEAS Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature , 198 – 211.
Hadi, N., Shaharudin, N., Faris, N., Abidin, W., Fadzil, N., & Isnin, S. (2024). Understanding writing difficulty and writing process among preuniversity students. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v9i9.2935.
Haidari, M., & Katawazai, R. (2020). The use of social media and wikis in teaching writing skills: A review article. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 14(16), 168–179.
Halim, M., & Hashim, H. (2019). Integrating web 2.0 technology in ESL classroom: A review on the benefits and barriers. Journal of Counseling and Educational Technology ISSN: 2654-8194 (Print) ISSN: 2654-9786 (Electronic).
Haron, H., & Kasuma, S. (2021). Exploring the impacts of peer interaction in ESL university students’ argumentative writing activities via whatsapp. IJoLLT, 4(2).
Harun, H., Bosro, M., Palpanadan, S., Ibrahim, M., Sohaimi, N., & Jannaton, N. (2021). Malaysian public university students’ challenging skills to pass Malaysian University English Test (MUET). AIP Conference Proceedings 2347, 020046. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0052712.
Hasani, L., Santoso, H., & Junus, K. (2022). Designing asynchronous online discussion forum interface and interaction based on the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 23(2), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i2.6016.
Jack, J., & Hashim, H. (2023). A systematic review on the tools used in teaching writing skills in ESL classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,13(1).
Jee, S., & Aziz, A. (2021). The application of the process-based writing approach in composing an argumentative essay: A case study of a suburban secondary school of Mukah district in Sarawak. Creative Education, 2021, 12, 880-896 https://www.scirp.org/journal/ce ISSN Online: 2151-4771 ISSN Print: 2151- 4755.
Joannes, R., & AlSaqqaf, A. (2022). The effect of analytic text-based writing strategies on ESL argumentative writing among malaysian form-six students in Sabah, Malaysia: A Proposal. Proceedings International Conference on Teaching and Education (ICoTE) Volume 3 English Language Teaching Research and Practices (2022).
Kamlun, K., Lee, C., & Omar, S. (2020). Exploring the students’ perceptions of the usefulness of clil modules and ICT integrated learning in English classroom. PJAEE, 17(6).
Karnine, S., Preece, A., Ahmad, I., & Muhammad, S. (2022). A study on difficulties encountered and perception by English as second language (ESL) learners in Malaysian University Examination Test (MUET). Proceedings 2022, 82, 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022082053https://www.mdpi.com/journal /proceedings.
Kashiha, H. (2018). Malaysian ESL students’ perception of metadiscourse in essay writing. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 2018, 8(3), 193-201.
Kashiha, H. (2022). An investigation of the use of cohesive devices in ESL students’ essay
Khanzode, K., & Sarode, D. (2016). Evolution of the world wide web: From web 1.0 to 6.0. International Journal of Digital Library Services 6.
Krejcie, R., & Morgan, D. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 607-610.
Li, M., Vale, C., Tan, H., & Blannin, J. (2024). A systematic review of TPACK research in primary mathematics education. Mathematics Education Research Journal https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-024-00491-3.
Mah, B. Y. (2024, Feb 6). WeCWI-Enabled Widgetised and Non-Widgetised Blogs: The Impact on Writing Performance. Retrieved from WeCWI: https://www.wecwi.com/post/blogs-writing-performance
Mah, B. Y. (2025, March 12). WeCWI. WeCWI Nexus: An AI-Enabled ID Model for Enhanced Cognitive and Language Development: Retrieved from https://www.wecwi.com/post/wecwi-nexus
Mah, B., & Cheah, H. (2022). Blogging in the new normal using the WeCWI-enabled blogging manual: A pilot study. International Journal of Modern Languages and Applied Linguistics e-ISSN: 2600-7266.
Mah, B., & Feifei Han. (2023). Self-assessed online listening tests as an OER: The senior english educators’ perspectives based on UTAUT model. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(7).
Mah, B., & Khor, G. (2015). Poor writing skill among uitm students: A qualitative systematic review of literature on sil's learner domain november 2015 conference: UPALS language colloquium 2015. Penang, Malaysia
Mah, B., & Rahim, S. (2019). A review on the application of blog, blogger, widget and hypertext to develop a web-based instructional tool. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (JELTIM), 1(2).
Mah, B., Rahim, S., Marimuthu, R., & Liaw, S. (2021). The effectiveness of WeCWI- enabled web-based instructional tool to improve writing performance and critical thinking level among undergraduate students. IBIMA Business Review. https://doi.org/10.5171/2021.932485 .
Mahmood, M. A. (2022). The role of reading in enhancing EFL learners’ language proficiency. A Scientific Quarterly Refereed Journal Issued by Lebanese French University – Erbil, Kurdistan, Iraq, 7(4), Winter 2022 ISSN 2518-6566 (Online) - ISSN 2518-6558 .
Malaysian Examination Council. (2018). Laporan Peperiksaan STPM 2018 MUET (800). Selangor: SASBADI Sdn. Bhd.
Malaysian Examination Council. (2019). Laporan Peperiksaan MUET (800) 2019. Selangor: SASBADI Sdn. Bhd.
Malaysian Examination Council. (2020). Laporan Peperiksaan STPM 2022 MUET 800. Selangor: SASBADI Sdn. Bhd.
Malaysian Examination Council. (2021). Laporan Peperiksaan STPM 2021 MUET 800. Selangor: SASBADI Sdn.Bhd.
Malaysian Examination Council. (2022). Laporan Peperiksaan STPM 2021 MUET 800. Selangor: SASBADI Sdn.Bhd.
Malaysian Examination Council. (2023). Report and Insights MUET 2023. Selangor: Pelangi Sdn.Bhd.
Maré, S., & Mutezo, A. (2025). The community of inquiry, shared metacognition, and student engagement in online learning: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2479164.
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. (2023). Designing online learning in higher education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_72.
Mensah, I., & Hilton, K. (2024). Assessing the statistical differences in academic writing skills across disciplines in higher education. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2344379.
Mukhtar , H., Ali, Z., & Amal , R. (2023). The importance of vocabulary in reading among EFL learners. European Proceedings of Educational Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.23097.61.
Nazri, N., Yunus, M., & Shukor, D. (2018). The effectiveness of using Mindomo as a pre-writing tool in improving writing scores among ESL students. The Asian ESP Journal, 14(5).
Parnabas, J., Areff, A., Baharom, H., Singh, H., & Yusop, Y. (2022). Strength and challenges faced by the pre-university students in extended writing in Malaysian University English Test (MUET). International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Societye-, 4(3), 140-154.
Phillips , M., & Harris, J. (2018). PCK and TPCK/TPACK: More Than Etiology. School of Education Book Chapters. 42. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/educationbookchapters/42
Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9) .
Rahim, S., Mah, B., & Ramlan, Z. (2019). Web-Based Instructional Tool For Enhancing EET Speaking Test Performance. IWSI 2019.
Raoofi, S., Binandeh, M., & Rahmani, S. (2017). An Investigation into writing strategies and writing proficiency of university students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(1), 191-198.
Rashid, A., Yunus, M., & Wahi, W. (2019). Using padlet for collaborative writing among ESL learners. Creative Education, 10, 610-620. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.103044.
Saprina , C., Rosyid, A., & Suryanti , Y. (2020). Difficulties in developing idea encountered by students in writing argumentative essay. Journal of English Language Studies, 5(1).
Shanmugam, B., Peng, C., & Luan, N. (2023). A study on the level of cognitive.
Spanou, S., & Zafiri, M.-N. (2019). Teaching reading and writing skills to young learners in english as a foreign language using blogs: a case study. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 2019, 7(2).
Suhaimi, L., & Yunus, M. (2021). ‘Zoom’ing into MUET students' perception in writing skills through online cooperative learning. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(9), 493 - 503.
Sukri, H., Norazizan, M., Mustapha, L., & Bahtiar, S. (2023). Students’ perception on Malaysian University English Test (MUET): Reflections and external factors. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT), 11(2).
Sulistyo, T., Mukminatien, N., Cahyono, B., & Saukah, A. (2019). Enhancing learners’ writing performance through blog-assisted language learning. iJET, 14(9).
Sütçüi, S. S. (2020). Blogging in EFL learners’ academic writing . International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(6).
Taopan, L., Drajati, N., & Sumardi. (2020). TPACK framework: Challenges and opportunities in EFL classrooms. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 3, 1-22.
Ulla , M., Bucol, J., & Ayuthaya, P. (2022). English language curriculum reform strategies: The impact of EMI on students’ language proficiency. Ampersand, 9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2022.100101.
Usman, O., Auliya, V., & Marsofiyati. (2022). TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) influence on teacher self efficacy, and perceived usefulness, ease of use and intention to use e-learning technology. IBIMA Publishing Journal of Southeast Asian Research. http://ibimapublishing.com/articles/ JSAR /2022/895111/ Vol. 2022.
Vula, E., Tyfekçi, N., & Biblekaj, L. (2024). Strategies for enhancing ESL writing proficiency: Insights from a pre-university educational setting. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 14(6)
Wahyuni, S., & Umam, M. (2017). An analysis on writing anxiety of indonesian EFL college learners. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 4(1), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v4i1.333.
Xue, J., Xu, X., Wu, Y., & Ping Hu. (2023). Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework and satisfaction: Examining the role of academic emotion and self-regulation in a structural model. Front. Educ. 8:1046737. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1046737.
Yabis, M., & Hamid, A. (2023). Language learning motivation of form six students preparing for MUET in Kota Kinabalu. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society , 5(1), 127-136.
Zainuddin, S., Pillai, S., Dumanig, F., & Phillip, A. (2019). English Language And Graduate Employability. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-06-2017-0089.
Zeng, S. (2020). The potential of online technology for language learning . English Language Teaching,13(10); 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Soraya Sharifuddin, Boon Yih Mah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


