The Effects of Collaborative Pre-Writing Asynchronous Discussion Using Graphic Organizers on EFL Argumentative Writing Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol12.2.1.2024Keywords:
Graphic organiser, collaborative pre-writing, argumentative writingAbstract
Chinese university students often face challenges in developing their English writing skills, which can cause frustration. To address this issue, the research study explored the impact of collaborative pre-writing asynchronous discussion on argumentative essay performance among Chinese EFL undergraduates. The study identified low levels of student participation in asynchronous online discussions and proposed an alternative method of collaborative pre-writing discussion through digital applications to generate graphic organizers. The research study utilized a quasi-experimental design in which two intact classes were randomly assigned to two conditions: (1) pre-writing discussion involving graphic organizers (n=56) and (2) pre-writing discussion with WeChat, a social networking tool (n=55). The results indicated that students in the experimental group who used graphic organizers significantly improved their argumentative essay writing skills. This suggests that online discussion using graphic organizers was a more effective pre-writing strategy as it facilitated more reflective and elaborative opinions, as demonstrated by the statistical results. Moreover, students in the experimental group displayed a positive attitude towards using graphic organizers in online discussions. These findings have important implications for improving the writing skills of Chinese EFL undergraduates. It suggests collaborative pre-writing discussions using graphic organizers can effectively enhance students’ writing skills.
Downloads
References
Abbad, M. M. M. (2021). Using the UTAUT model to understand students’ usage of e-learning systems in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7205–7224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10573-5
Aloni, M., & Harrington, C. (2018). Research based practices for improving the effectiveness of asynchronous online discussion boards. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 4(4), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000121
Amiryousefi, M. (2017). The differential effects of collaborative vs. individual prewriting planning on computer-mediated L2 writing: transferability of task-based linguistic skills in focus. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 766–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1360361
Bacha, N. N. (2010). Teaching the academic argument in a university EFL environment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.05.001
Beiki, M., Gharagozloo, N., & Raissi, R. (2020). The effect of structured versus unstructured collaborative pre-writing task on writing skills of the Iranian EFL students. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00092-0
Butcher, K. R. (2006). Learning from text with diagrams: Promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.182
Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1996). The Mind Map Book: How to Use Radiant Thinking to Maximize your Brain’s Untapped Potential. Penguin.
Cai, J. (2010). Research on the Basis and Measures for College English Teaching Reform. Technology in Foreign Language Instruction, 133, 3–12.
Casado-Ledesma, L., Cuevas, I., Van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., Mateos, M., Granado-Peinado, M., & Martín, E. (2021). Teaching argumentative synthesis writing through deliberative dialogues: instructional practices in secondary education. Instructional Science, 49(4), 515–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09548-3
Chang, B., & Lu, F. C. (2018). Social Media Facilitated English Prewriting Activity Design and Evaluation. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0363-0
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE.
de Lima, D. P. R., Gerosa, M. A., Conte, T. U., & José, J. F. (2019). What to expect, and how to improve online discussion forums: the instructors’ perspective. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-019-0120-0
Dong, Y. (2017). Teaching and Assessing Critical Thinking in Second Language Writing: An Infusion Approach. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2017-0025
Ebadijalal, M., & Moradkhani, S. (2023). Impacts of computer-assisted collaborative writing, collaborative prewriting, and individual writing on EFL learners’ performance and motivation. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2178463
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2017). Writing with 21st century social tools in the L2 classroom: New literacies, genres, and writing practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.002
Fan, C. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2021). A scaffolding tool to assist learners in argumentative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(1–2), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1660685
Ghanbari, N., & Salari, M. (2022). Problematizing Argumentative Writing in an Iranian EFL Undergraduate Context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862400
Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431. http://baywood.com
Hewitt, J. (2005). Toward an Understanding of How Threads Die in Asynchronous Computer Conferences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(4), 567–589.
Iordanou, K. (2022). Supporting strategic and meta-strategic development of argument skill: the role of reflection. Metacognition and Learning, 17(2), 399–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09289-1
Iordanou, K., Kuhn, D., Matos, F., Shi, Y., & Hemberger, L. (2019). Learning by Arguing. Learning and Instruction, 63, 101–207.
Iordanou, K., & Rapanta, C. (2021). “Argue With Me”: A Method for Developing Argument Skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631203
Jeon, M., Kwon, K., & Bae, H. (2023). Effects of different graphic organizers in asynchronous online discussions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 689–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10175-z
Jiang, D., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2021). Comparing face-to-face and computer-mediated collaboration when teaching EFL writing skills. Educational Psychology, 41(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1785399
Jyothi, S., McAvinia, C., & Keating, J. (2012a). A visualisation tool to aid exploration of students’ interactions in asynchronous online communication. Computers and Education, 58(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.026
Jyothi, S., McAvinia, C., & Keating, J. (2012b). A visualisation tool to aid exploration of students’ interactions in asynchronous online communication. Computers and Education, 58(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.026
Kim, M. K., & Ketenci, T. (2019). Learner participation profiles in an asynchronous online collaboration context. Internet and Higher Education, 41, 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.02.002
Koszalka, T. A., Pavlov, Y., & Wu, Y. (2021). The informed use of pre-work activities in collaborative asynchronous online discussions: The exploration of idea exchange, content focus, and deep learning. Computers and Education, 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104067
Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking. Psychological Science, 22(4), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611402512
Kuhn, D., Goh, W., Iordanou, K., & Shaenfield, D. (2008). Arguing on the computer: A microgenetic study of developing argument skills in a computer-supported environment. Child Development, 79(5), 1310–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01190.x
Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2007). Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument. Thinking and Reasoning, 13(2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780600625447
Kuhn, D., Zillmer, N., Crowell, A., & Zavala, J. (2013). Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence. Cognition and Instruction, 31(4), 456–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.830618
Kwon, K., Shin, S., & Park, S. J. (2018). Effects of graphic organizers in online discussions: comparison between instructor-provided and student-generated. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(6), 1479–1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9617-7
Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. (1987). Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–99.
Leeming, P., Aubrey, S., & Lambert, C. (2022). Collaborative Pre-Task Planning Processes and Second Language Task Performance. RELC Journal, 53(3), 534–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220953225
Li, H. H., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Effects of structured small-group student talk as collaborative prewriting discussions on Chinese university EFL students’ individual writing: A quasi-experimental study. PLoS ONE, 16(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251569
Li, X., & Yu, Y. (2020). Characteristics of asynchronous online discussions in a graduate course: an exploratory study. Information and Learning Science, 121(7–8), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0120
Liang, M., & Xie, Y. (2023). Exploring the effects of planning conditions and peer familiarity on Chinese EFL learners’ argumentative writing. System, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103057
Liao, J. (2018). The impact of face-to-face oral discussion and online text-chat on L2 Chinese writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.06.005
Liao, M., & Liao, Y. (2022). Improving Chinese College Students’ Argumentative Writing: A Presentation-Assimilation-Discussion-Exercise Approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874531
Magdahalena. (2016). The Use of Prewriting Methods to Develop EFL Students’ Competence in Writing. ETERNAL, 2(1), 14–24.
Mateos, M., Martín, E., Cuevas, I., Villalón, R., Martínez, I., & González-Lamas, J. (2018). Improving Written Argumentative Synthesis by Teaching the Integration of Conflicting Information from Multiple Sources. Cognition and Instruction, 36(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1425300
McDonough, K., De Vleeschauwer, J., & Crawford, W. J. (2019). Exploring the benefits of collaborative prewriting in a Thai EFL context. Language Teaching Research, 23(6), 685–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818773525
Murphy, E., & Coleman, E. (2004). Graduate Students’ Experiences of Challenges in Online Asynchronous Discussions. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 30(2).
Neumann, H., & Mcdonough, K. (2014). Exploring the relationships among student preferences, prewriting tasks, and text quality in an EAP context. Journal of English for Academic Purpose, 15, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.05.002
Neumann, H., & McDonough, K. (2015). Exploring student interaction during collaborative prewriting discussions and its relationship to L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 84–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.009
Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2006). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct Them. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, 1(1), 1–31. http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf
Nussbaum, E. M., & Schraw, G. (2007). Promoting Argument-Counterargument Integration in Students’ Writing. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(1), 59–92.
Prata, M. J., de Sousa, B., Festas, I., & Oliveira, A. L. (2019). Cooperative methods and self-regulated strategies development for argumentative writing. Journal of Educational Research, 112(1), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1427037
Qin, J. (2009). The Analysis of Toulmin Elements and Use of Sources in Chinese University EFL Argumentative Writing. Northern Arizona University.
Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System, 38(3), 444–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012
Qiu, M. (2019). Fostering both extensive and intensive threaded discourse—Discussion thread development and class size. Computers and Education, 139, 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.009
Rapanta, C., & Felton, M. K. (2022). Learning to Argue Through Dialogue: a Review of Instructional Approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 477–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09637-2
Roussey, J.-Y., & Gombert, A. (1996). Improving Argumentative Writing Skills: Effect of Two Types of Aids. Argumentation, 10, 283–300.
Shi, Y., Zhang, Z., Cao, S., & Liu, Q. (2023). Dialogic teaching of controversial issues: discursive moves to enact two-sided discussions. Language and Education, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2023.2240292
Suthers, D. D. (2001). Collaborative Representations: Supporting Face to Face and Online Knowledge-building Discourse. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10. http://lilt.ics.hawaii.edu/belvedere/materials/index.html.
Suthers, D., Vatrapu, R., Medina, R., Joseph, S., Dwyer, N., & Suthers, D. (2008). Beyond Threaded Discussion: Representational Guidance in Asynchronous Collaborative Learning Environments. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1103–1127.
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). Continuum.
Swain, M. (2010). Talking-it-through: Languaging as a source of learning. In Batestone R (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 112–130). Oxford University Press.
Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L. (2011). Sociocultural theory in second language education. An introduction through narratives. Multilingual Matters.
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Snoeck Henkemeans, F., Blair, J. A., Johnson, R. H., Krabbe, E. C. W., Plantin, C., Walton, D. N., Willard, C. A., Woods, J., & Zarefsky, D. (2016). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In Wertsch J.V (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet Psychology (pp. 144–188). M.E. Sharpe.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. MIT Press.
Wagner, C., Parra, M., & Proctor, P. (2017). The Interplay Between Student-Led Discussions and Argumentative Writing. TESOL Quarterly, 51(2), 438–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-005-7738-9
Wang, S. (2016). Interpretation of Key Points in the “Guidelines for College English Teaching.” Foreign Language World, 174(3), 2–10.
Wells, C. (1999). Dialogic inquiry. Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press.
Wolfe, C. R., Britt, M. A., & Butler, J. A. (2009). Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation. Written Communication, 26(2), 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309333019
Yang, R. (2022). An empirical study on the scaffolding Chinese university students’ English argumentative writing based on toulmin model. Heliyon, 8(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12199
Yu, S., Geng, F., Liu, C., & Zheng, Y. (2021). What works may hurt: The negative side of feedback in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 54, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100850
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Chen Chen, Boon Yih Mah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
