Using Padlet to Enhance Year 11 Students Engagement in Learning Genetic


  • Geetha Subramaniam Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
  • Hidayah Mohd Fadzil Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA



Students’ engagement, Biology Education, Genetic, Collaboration, Padlet


Genetics is difficult for students to understand since genetic processes are intangible. As students have difficulty studying genetic, it is very difficult to retain them engaged in their learning process. On the other side, engagement of students is the focal point of educators. Following this, making use of digital platform to engage students in learning topics that are perceived difficult such as Genetic in biology learning is seen to be an irresistible option. This Padlet visual could be likened to an online notepad that can be utilized to engage students in various ways. The research objective is to explore the use of Padlet to enhance student engagement in learning genetic by focusing on behavioral engagement and perception of students using Padlet. A qualitative research design is used where purposive sampling used to select participants. A total of 6 Year 11 students was selected from a private secondary school in Kelana Jaya, Selangor. Students were introduced to Padlet through briefing session and completed the task assigned in Padlet. Observation, interview, and document analysis is used for data collection. This research concluded that using Padlet has the potential to enhance student’s behavioral engagement in learning Genetic through following task-oriented instruction, facilitation of collaboration and sharing knowledge. It was found that various insights from students gained regarding using Padlet in learning genetic that categorized into positive perception that is going to be retained for enhancing student’s engagement within the lesson and negative perception that can be improved. This research provides useful records about using Padlet to engage student in learning Genetic as well to surmount the learning challenges of students in biology.


Download data is not yet available.


Abdullah, N., Nik Yusuf, N. A., Mohamed Noh, N., & Md Zabit, M. N. (2017). Pembinaan perisian interaktif untuk menerapkan kemahiran proses sains dalam mata pelajaran sains sekolah rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 7(1), 76-92.

Adiantika, H. (2018). The implementation of task based instruction in EFL teaching speaking skill. Indonesian EFL Journal, 4(2), 12-22. doi:doi:10.25134/iefj.v4i2.1371

Altunoglu, Bahattin & Seker, Metin. (2015). The Understandings of Genetics Concepts and Learning Approach of Pre-Service Science Teachers. Journal of Educational and Social Research. 10.5901/jesr.2015.v5n1s1p61.

Altunoglu, Bahattin, Seker, & Metin. (2015). The understandings of Genetic concepts and learning approach of pre-service teachers. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 6(1), 1-7.

Backer, J. M., Jaymeson, L., Timmer, & Shannon, M. (2018). The effects of Collaborative Grouping on student engagement in grouping on student engagement in middle school students. SOPHIA, 2-65.

Beltran-Martin, I. (2019). Using Padlet for Collaborative Learning. 5th International Conference on Higher Education Advances, 201-2118

Carless, D., & D, B. (2018). The Development of Student Feedback Literacy:Enabling Uptake of Feedback. 43(8), 1315-1325. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354C

Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for Interview Research: The Interview Protocol Refinement Framework. The Qualitative Report, 21(5), 811-831.

Cetin-Dindar, A., & Geban, O. (2017). Conceptual Understanding of acids and bases concepts and motivation to learn chemistry. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(1), 85-97. doi:10.1080/00220671.2015.1039422

Charaya. (2017). Impact of ICT on Creativity and Achievement Ability of Perspective Teachers and Students of Technical Education. International Journal on Arts,Management and Humanities, 6(2), 15-22.

Cristina, M., Georgeta, I., & Anna Diaz-Vicario. (2020). Factors influencing students' peer feedback uptake:instructional design matters. Assessment &Evaluation in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/02602938.20201726283

Dewitt, D., & Siraj, S. (2015). Collaborative learning:Interactive debates using Padlet in a higher education institution. Proceedings of the International Educational Technology Conference(IETC 2015).

Didem, K. (2016). A Cross-National Study of Students' Understanding of Genetics Concepts:Implications from Similarities and Differences in England and Turkey Educationa.

Farahidatul, A. A. (2017). Padlet:A Digital Collaborative Tool For Academic Writing. Journal of Education and Social Science, 8(1).

Fisher, & Cynthia. (2017). Padlet:An Online Tool for Learner Engagement and Collaboration. Academy of Management Learning & Education.

Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2016). The measurement of student engagement:A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments.

Frey, B. (2018). Cross Cultural Research. In The SAGE encylopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation (pp. 436-437). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications,Inc.

Fuchs, B. (2014). The writing is on the wall:Using Padlet for whole class engagement. 40(4).

Geevargese, P. (2017). Problems of Students with Internet Usage. International Journal of Research in Social Science, 7(9).

Gupta, P. K. (2019). Teaching genetics in India:Problems and possible solutions. Indian J.Genetic, 79(1), 326-339.

Hamilton-Hankins, & Octavia, J. (2017). The Impact of Technology Integration on the Engagement Levels of Ten Second Grade Students in an English.

Harris, L. (2010). Delivering,modifying or collaborating?Examining three teacher conception of how to facilitate student engagement. 16(1), 131-151. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.006

Harris, L. (2011). Secondary teachers' conception of student engagement:Engagement in learning or in schooling?Teaching and Teacher education. International Journal of Research and Studies, 27(2), 376-386. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.006

Henrie, C. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning:A review. Journal Computers&Education, 90, 36-53.

Henrie, Curtis, Halverson, Lisa, & Graham. (2015). Measuring Student Engagement in Technology-Mediated Learning: A Review. 36-53. doi:10.1016/j.cempedu.2015.09.005

Humphrey, O. (2018). A Technology Review of the Padlet sharing platform. Journal of Educational Innovation.

Humphrey, O., & Lowe, T. (2017). Exploring how a "Sense of Belonging" is facilitated at different stages of the student journey in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Innovation,Partnership and Change, 3(1).

Jacob, G. M. (2016). Ten strengths of how teachers do cooperative learning.

Kimura, M. (2018). ICT,A Motivating Tool:A Case study with Padlet., (pp. 122-128).

Louw, J., Muller, J., & Tredoux, C. (2008). Time-on task,technology and mathemathics achivement.

Lowe, Tom, Humphrey, & Owen. (2018). A Platform for Partnership: A Technology Review of the Padlet sharing platform. The Journal of Educational Innovation. doi:10.21100/jeipc.v4i1.706

Masika, Rachel, Jones, & Jennifer. (2016). Bulding student belonging and engagement:Insights into higher education student experiences of participating and learning together. 21, 138-150. doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1122585

McGlynn, & Kozlowski. (2016). Empowering students through collaboration. 40(4), 64-67.

Mohamed Noh, N., Abdullah, N., Kung Teck, W., & Hamzah, M. (2017). Keberkesanan pendekatan Flipped Classroom dalam pembelajaran Sains di Sekolah Rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 7(2), 106-118.

Mustafa K. Alimoglu, Didar B. Sarac, Derya Alparslan, Ayse A. Karakas & Levent Altintas (2014) An observation tool for instructor and student behaviors to measure in-class learner engagement.Medical Education Online, 19(1).1-8

Nahla Helmy Nadeem (2019). Students' Perceptions About the Impact of Using Padlet on Class Engagement: An Exploratory Case Study. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 9(4),72-89

Norziha. (2019). Enhancing Classroom Engagement Through Padlet as a Learning Tool:A Case Study. International Journal of Innovative Computing, 10(1), 49-57.

Nurshamsida, Nurizatul (2014). Assessing Cognitive Abilities in Learning Genetics Among Biology Matriculation Students. International Conference of Teaching and Learning.

Parsons, Jim, Taylor, & Leah. (2011). Improving Student Engagement.Current Issues in Education.

Parsons, S. A., Nuland, L. R., & Parsons, A. W. (2014). The ABCs of Student Engagement. 95(8), 23-27. doi:

Ruohan, L., & Ayoung, S. (2015). Factors Influencing Information Credibility on Social Media.

Simpson, G., & J, C. (2016). Assessing Postgraduate Student Perception and Measures of Learning in a Peer Review Feedback.

Tippet, C. (2016). What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science. International Journal of Science Education, 725-746.

Tom. (2018). A Platform for Partnership:A Technology Review of the Padlet sharing platform. Journal of Educational Innovation.

Triyanto. (2019). Understanding student participation within a group learning. South African Journal of Education, 1-8.

Tuan, D. N., Marissa, C., & Jason, M. (n.d.). Understanding student behavioural engagement:Importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. The Journal of Educational Research. doi:10.1080/00220671.2016.1220359

Wong, D., & Maceira, T. (2017). Beyond Passive Learning:Utilizing Active Learning Tools for Engagement,Reflection,and Creation,Technology and Academic Libraries. Innovative Services for Research and Learning, 73-89.



How to Cite

Subramaniam, G., & Mohd Fadzil, H. (2021). Using Padlet to Enhance Year 11 Students Engagement in Learning Genetic. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 11(2), 39–50.