Transformative teaching: the synergy of paragogy and peer assessment in teacher training courses

Authors

  • Muhammad Noor Abdul Aziz School of Education, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
  • Siti Noor Aneeis Hashim School of Education, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
  • Saifolrudin Khalid Mahzan School of Education, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol15.2.1.2025

Keywords:

Paragogy, peer assessment, postgraduate student, teacher education, transformative teaching

Abstract

The need for more creative approaches that emphasise active and collaborative learning is being recognised by teacher education more and more. The insufficiency of traditional models in training educators for the needs of contemporary classrooms underscores the pressing need for revolutionary educational methods. By examining the experiences of 15 postgraduate student teachers engaged in curriculum and instruction courses, this qualitative case study investigates how paragogy and peer assessment might be integrated into teacher training programs. Three sources of data namely focused group interviews, assessment exercises, and classroom observations were garnered for data analysis. As part of the evaluation process for their courses, these students engage in peer assessment activities. Three major themes emerged from the study's thematic analysis, which involved participant interviews and classroom observations: ongoing professional and personal assistance, informal constructive criticism, and peer-assisted learning. The findings add to the continuing conversation regarding successful tactics in the current educational environment by highlighting the collaboration between paragogy and peer evaluation as a catalyst for innovative teaching approaches in educator preparation programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, R. E. S., & Wiles, J. L. (2016). A rose by any other name: Participants choosing research pseudonyms. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13(2), 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1133746

Alt, D., & Raichel, N. (2022). Problem-based learning, self- and peer assessment in higher education: Towards advancing lifelong learning skills. Research Papers in Education, 37(3), 370-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1849371

Asomah, R. K., Agyei, D. D., & Ntow, F. D. (2023). Developing in-service mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and skills to teach trigonometry: Using cooperative teaching and learning approach. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 4(1), ep23001. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/12540

Asregid, D., Mihiretie, D. M., & Kassa, S. A. (2023). Teacher educators use of feedback to facilitate reflective practice among pre-service teachers during microteaching. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2257121. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2257121

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122

Blondeel, E., Everaert, P., & Opdecam, E. (2024). Does practice make perfect? The effect of online formative assessments on students’ self-efficacy and test anxiety. The British Accounting Review, 56(4), 101189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2023.101189

Boylan, M., Adams, G., Perry, E., & Booth, J. (2023). Re-imagining transformative professional learning for critical teacher professionalism: A conceptual review. Professional Development in Education, 49(4), 651-669. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2022.2162566

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Cao, W., & Yu, Z. (2023). Exploring learning outcomes, communication, anxiety, and motivation in learning communities: A systematic review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 866. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02325-2

Chakyarkandiyil, N., & Prakasha, G. S. (2023). Cooperative learning strategies: Implementation challenges in teacher education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 81(3), 340-360. https://dx.doi.org/10.33225/pec/23.81.340

Chong, S. W., & Lin, T. (2024). Feedback practices in journal peer-review: A systematic literature review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2164757

Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C., W. Y. (2016). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning: From theory to practice. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8

Colognesi, S., Vassart, C., Blondeau, B., & Coertjens, L. (2020). Formative peer assessment to enhance primary school pupils’ oral skills: Comparison of written feedback without discussion or oral feedback during a discussion. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 100917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100917

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2021). Defining teaching quality around the world. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(3), 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1919080

Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022). Incorporating AI and learning analytics to build trustworthy peer assessment systems. British Journal of Educational Technology (BJET), 53(4), 844–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13233

Deneen, C. C., & Hoo, H. -T. (2023). Connecting teacher and student assessment literacy with self-evaluation and peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(2), 214-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967284

Denzin, N. K. (2009). The elephant in the living room: Or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. Qualitative Research, 9(2), 139-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794108098034

Dutta, S., He, M., & Tsang, D., C. W. (2023). Reflection and peer assessment to promote self-directed learning in higher education. Journal of Educational Research and Reviews, 11(3), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.33495/jerr_v11i3.23.111

Ekambaram, A. (2024). Knowledge sharing and learning in projects - Focusing on time restriction. IOP Publishing Ltd: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1389/1/012024

Haro, A. V., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H., J. A., Mulder, M., & Banihashem, S. K. (2024). How does the type of online peer feedback influence feedback quality, argumentative essay writing quality, and domain-specific learning? Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 5459-5478. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2215822

Herlo, D. (2014). Paragogy: A new theory in educational sciences. Journal Plus Education, 10(1), 35-41. https://www.uav.ro/jour/index.php/jpe/article/view/213/227

Hogg, L. M. (2018). Empowering students through peer assessment: Interrogating complexities and challenges. Reflective Practice, 19(3), 308-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1437404

Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Boud, D. (2020). Developing student competence through peer assessment: The role of feedback, self-regulation and evaluative judgement. Higher Education, 80, 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00469-2

Iglesias-Pérez, M. C., Vidal-Puga, J., & Pino-Juste, M. R. (2022). The role of self and peer assessment in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 683-692. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1783526

Javed, F. (2024). Transformative learning strategies for effective teaching and learning in digitized higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan, 25(1), 14-19. https://doi.org/10.33830/jp.v25i1.7330.2024

Lam, C. N. C., Hadina Habil, & Siew, M. H. (2022). A mobile application developed for scaffolding ESL learners in providing peer feedback. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 7(2), 291-313. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp291-313

Le, H. V., & Nguyen, L. Q. (2024). Promoting L2 learners’ critical thinking skills: the role of social constructivism in reading class. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1241973. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1241973

Li, H., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C. V., Guo, X., & Tywoniw, R. (2020). Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 193-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679

Li, L., & Kim, M. (2024). It is like a friend to me: Critical usage of automated feedback systems by self-regulating English learners in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8821

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Lukins, J. M., Able, H., & Hume, K. (2023). Novice teachers’ implementation of evidence-based practices in autism education: Examining the roles of preparation and perception. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 38(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576221144734

Madden, J. (2023). The influence of the St. Edward’s teacher as researcher initiative on teacher professional learning. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 11(12), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2023.1112010

Mathrani, A., Sarvesh, T., & Umer, R. (2022). Digital divide framework: Online learning in developing countries during the COVID-19 lockdown. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 20(5), 625-640. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1981253

Mohammad Arsyad Arrafii. (2023). Assessment reform in Indonesia: Contextual barriers and opportunities for implementation. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(1), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1898931

Muhammad Noor Abdul Aziz, & Fathiyyah Abu Bakar. (2022). From zero to hero: Embedding paragogy in assisting non-major students in achieving the CLOs. 6th Inspirational Scholar Symposium 2021. http://utlc.uum.edu.my/images/2021/ebook/e-PROCEEDING_ISS_2021.pdf

Nor Fazlin Mohd Ramli, Farina Tazijan, Azianura Hani Shaari, & Wang, N. A. (2023). Identifying 21st-century skills gap in the ESL/EFL Malaysian postgraduate education system. Asian People Journal (APJ), 6(2), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2023.6.2.551

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2013). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Perveen, A., Hazalizah Hamzah, & Fatanah Ramlee. (2020). Effectiveness of self-esteem based interventions to enhance self esteem and academic achievement among undergraduate students. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(8), 1973-1983. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&cluster=3269652124565965246&btnI=1&hl=en

Petrychenko, O., Petrichenko, I., Burmaka, I., & Vynohradova, A. (2023). Changes in modern university: Challenges of today and development trends. Transport Systems and Technologies, (41), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.32703/2617-9059-2023-41-6

Prestridge, S., & Cox, D. (2023). Play like a team in teams: A typology of online cognitive-social learning engagement. Active Learning in Higher Education, 24(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421990986

Qadir, J., Abd-Elhamid M. Taha, Yau, A. K. -L., João, P., Hussain, S., Al-Fuqaha, A., & Muhammad Ali Imran. (2020, June). Leveraging the force of formative assessment & feedback for effective engineering education. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line. http://dx.doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34923

Setterington, N. A., McLean, S., & Woods, A. (2023). Design, implementation, and evaluation of students as partners interactive feedback model. Advances in Physiology Education, 47, 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00182.2022

Sharma, K., Nguyen, A., & Hong, Y. (2024). Self-regulation and shared regulation in collaborative learning in adaptive digital learning environments: A systematic review of empirical studies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1398-1436. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13459

Siti Nur Fathanah Abd Hamid, Muhammad Haziq Zaini, Wan Saidatul Nasuha Wan Maizon, Nor Azira Ayob, & Farzana Izzati Abdullah. (2024). Engaging synergetic pedagogical approaches for higher education: An innovative teaching plan for educators. Journal of Administrative Science, 21(1), 314-332. https://jas.uitm.edu.my/images/2024_APRIL/15.pdf

Sousa-Vieira, M. R., López-Ardao, J. C., Fernández-Veiga, M., & Rodríguez-Rubio, R. F. (2023). Study of the impact of social learning and gamification methodologies on learning results in higher education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(1), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22575

Sroyprapai, P., Songsriwittaya, A., Kaewrattanapat, N., & Nittayathammakul, V. (2025). The cloud-based remote learning via digital media ecosystem to enhance learning engagement among undergraduate students in engineering education. Studies in Media and Communication, 13(2), 96-111. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v13i2.7524

Sánchez-Cruzado, C., Campión, R. S., & Sánchez-Compaña, M. T. (2021). Teacher digital literacy: The indisputable challenge after COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(4), 1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041858

Toyokawa, Y., Horikoshi, I., Rwitajit Majumdar, & Ogata, H. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of AI in inclusive education: A case study of data-enhanced active reading in Japan. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00286-2

Trujillo, J. M., DiVall, M. V., Barr, J. T., Gonyeau, M. J., Van Amburgh, J. A., Matthews, S. J., & Qualters, D. M. (2009). Development of a peer teaching-assessment program and a peer observation and evaluation tool. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(6), 147. http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20002373

Veine, S., Anderson, M. K., Andersen, N. H., Espenes, T. C., Søyland, T. B., Wallin, P., & Reams, J. (2020). Reflection as a core student learning activity in higher education - Insights from nearly two decades of academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(2), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1659797

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Tool and symbol in child development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes (pp. 19-30). Harvard University Press.

Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (applied social research methods) (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7

Zhang, D., & Hwang, G. -J. (2023). Effects of interaction between peer assessment and problem-solving tendencies on students’ learning achievements and collaboration in mobile technology-supported project-based learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(1), 208-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221094250

Downloads

Published

2025-10-27

How to Cite

Abdul Aziz, M. N., Hashim, S. N. A., & Mahzan, S. K. (2025). Transformative teaching: the synergy of paragogy and peer assessment in teacher training courses. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education, 15(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol15.2.1.2025