Case Study of Air Kerma Standardization Comparison for Cs-137 For Radiation Protection Level

Authors

  • Faridah Lisa Supian Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Mohd Taufik Dolah Radiation Safety & Health Division (BKS), Malaysian Nuclear Agency, 43000 Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Syahriman Mohd Azmi Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Chee Fah Wong Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Abdullah Faisal Al Naim Department of Physics, College of Science, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 400, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol13.1.9.2025

Keywords:

Air Kerma, Cesium 137, Chamber, Gamma Rays, Radiation Protection

Abstract

In this work, 137Cs radioactive source was measured at the Gamma irradiation lab, Radiation Safety & Health Division, Malaysian Nuclear Agency. The experiment was developed to ensure the standard of the calibration annual processes. Different thicknesses of lead sheets were used for beam attenuation to measure the 137Cs dose range. Five sets of charges per minute were measured using an ionization chamber at a 1.0 m source-detector distance (SDDs). The temperature pressure correction factor, KTP was calculated from the average pressure and temperature of each set. The beam charge of the unattenuated and the lead attenuated beam was measured. The air kerma, K of each set, has been calculated and compared with the 2016 data set. The deviation of the measured doses was calculated and is within below 2%. The close agreement of the year 2016 and 2023 results ensures the uniformity of the measurements has been complied with.

References

Adliene D, Griciene B, Skovorodko K, Laurikaitiene J. (2020). Occupational radiation exposure of health professionals and cancer risk assessment for Lithuanian nuclear medicine workers. Environmental Research, 183, 109144.

Alexander GA. (2016). Radiation Decontamination. In Ciottone GR (Eds.), Ciottone's Disaster Medicine (2nd ed., pp. 519–523). Elsevier.

Allam SME, Algany MMA, Khider YIA. (2024). Radiation safety compliance awareness among healthcare workers exposed to ionizing radiation. BMC Nursing, 23, 208.

Cobanoglu H, Cayir A. (2024). Occupational exposure to radiation among health workers: Genome- integrity and predictors of exposure. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 893, 503726.

Safety Report Series 16. (2000). Calibration of Radiation Protection Monitoring Instruments. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.

Sari-Minodier I, Orsiere T, Auquier P, Martin F, Botta A. (2007). Cytogenetic monitoring by use of the micronucleus assay among hospital workers exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 629 (2), 111-121.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-20

How to Cite

Supian, F. L., Dolah, M. T., Mohd Azmi, M. S., Wong, C. F., & Al Naim, A. F. (2024). Case Study of Air Kerma Standardization Comparison for Cs-137 For Radiation Protection Level. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 13(1), 99-105. https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol13.1.9.2025

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 25

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.