Assessment Convergence: Teachers’ Praxis and Professional Needs in Mathematics

Authors

  • Vincent Banot College of Teacher Education, Negros Oriental State University, Dumaguete City 6200, Negros Oriental, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol13.2.14.2025

Keywords:

Teaching Mathematics , Mathematics in the Elementary , National Achievement Test, Assessment in Mathematics, Elementary Mathematics

Abstract

This study investigated the preparedness, instructional practices, and professional development needs of elementary mathematics teachers to inform the design of a capacity-building program aimed at enhancing instructional quality and assessment alignment with the National Achievement Test (NAT). Using a descriptive research design, data were gathered from 35 mathematics teachers across 18 public elementary schools in one city division in the Philippines. A validated researcher-made questionnaire measured preparedness across four domains: content knowledge, pedagogical strategies, assessment practices, and NAT alignment. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests, while qualitative responses were subjected to thematic analysis. Findings revealed that teachers demonstrated high preparedness in content, pedagogy, and assessment but expressed very high training needs, particularly in assessment literacy and NAT alignment. Years of teaching experience showed a significant relationship with content knowledge, while sex was associated with differences in content and pedagogical preparedness. Other demographic factors such as age, position, and educational attainment showed no significant influence. Qualitative results highlighted major instructional challenges, including pupils’ poor problem-solving skills, lack of mastery in basic operations, and limited learning resources. Teachers also emphasized misalignment between classroom assessments and NAT competencies. The study concludes that teacher preparedness in mathematics is multidimensional and shaped by continuous professional learning rather than demographic attributes. It recommends a comprehensive professional development program focused on assessment design, test alignment, and pedagogical innovation to strengthen instructional quality and improve mathematics achievement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akoglu H. (2018). User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(3), 91-93. doi:10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001

Berame JS. (2023). Level of technological implementation in science instruction to enhance National Achievement Test (NAT) performance in Butuan City Division, Philippines. American Journal of Education and Technology, 2(2), 124-133. doi:10.54536/ajet.v2i2.1639

Callaman RA, Itaas EC. (2020). Students’ mathematics achievement in Mindanao context: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 5(2), 148-159. doi:10.23917/jramathedu.v5i2.10282

Casildo NJG. (2022). Modelling the effect of academic performance on National Achievement Test (NAT). In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 1, 517-522. doi:10.5220/0011106300003182

Cuajao J. (2024). National Achievement Test (NAT) results and academic performance: A comparative analysis of Filipino proficiency across two academic years. EPH - International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 9(2), 14-25. doi:10.53555/eijhss.v9i2.193

Galangco J. (2023). Path model of mathematics achievement in senior high school. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 12(3), 246-264. doi:10.17583/redimat.12759

Geoffrey T, Silaji T, Eze CE, Eze VHU. (2024). Examining the relationship between teachers’ qualifications and students’ academic performance. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(2), 66-77. doi:10.36079/lamintang.jhass-0602.634

Gyeltshen S. (2021). Examining the influence of university teachers’ qualification and experience on students’ academic achievement in mathematics. Asian Research Journal of Mathematics, 17(7), 9-18. doi:10.9734/ARJOM/2021/v17i730314

Judijanto L, Supriyadi T, Lumbantoruan JH, Jeranah. (2023). Elementary school students’ effectiveness towards improving mathematics learning outcomes in additional material. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 10(3), 614-625. doi:10.53400/mimbar-sd.v10i3.65455

Mirasol JM, Necosia JVB, Bicar BB, Garcia HP. (2021). Statutory policy analysis on access to Philippine quality basic education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100093. doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100093

Montero JC, Geducos DT. (2022). Improved conceptual understanding in learning biology through localized and contextualized learning activities. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(7), 1231-1238. doi:10.11594/ijmaber.03.07.01

Obeka ON. (2024). Influence of teachers’ qualification on students’ achievement in English language at the upper basic education level in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. British Journal of Education, 12(4), 47-56. doi:10.37745/bje.2013/vol12n44756

Paredes DT, Albopera RG, Balog GT, Buladas VA, Hoyle MGD, Guimere MVA, Renoblas CC. (2020). Mathematics grade as correlate to performance in the National Achievement Test. University of Bohol Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 8(1), 32-47. doi:10.15631/ubmrj.v8i1.127

Reyno RG, Guzman RB. (2025). Factors affecting the performance of students in the National Achievement Test. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(6), 605-617. doi:10.69569/jip.2025.255

Rittle-Johnson B, Adler R, Durkin K. (2024). Predicting marginalized students’ mathematics achievement in high school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 25(5), 732-753. doi:10.1080/15248372.2024.2384547

Saka AOO. (2021). Can teacher collaboration improve students’ academic achievement in junior secondary mathematics? Asian Journal of University Education, 17(1), 33-46. doi:10.19126/suje.980052

Salifu AS, Bakari A. (2022). Exploring the relationship between students’ perception, interest and mathematics achievement. Mediterranean Journal of Social and Behavioral Research, 6(1), 13-20. doi:10.30935/mjosbr/11491

Schoen RC, Rhoads C, Perez AL, Tazaz AM, Secada WG. (2024). Impact of cognitively guided instruction on elementary school mathematics achievement: Five years after the initial opportunity. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 17(3), 245-268. doi:10.1080/19345747.2024.2419396

Tatar AE, Düştegör D. (2020). Prediction of academic performance at undergraduate graduation: Course grades or grade point average? Applied Sciences, 10(14), 4900. doi:10.3390/app10144967

Tyminski AM, Brittain M. (2022). Scholarly practice and inquiry: Dynamic interactions in an elementary mathematics methods course. The Mathematics Educator, 30(2), 64-93. doi:10.63301/tme.v30i2.2454

Wang XS, Perry LB, Malpique A, Ide T. (2023). Factors predicting mathematics achievement in PISA: A systematic review. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 11, 24. doi:10.1186/s40536-023-00174-8

Wu X, Wu R, Chang HH, Kong Q, Zhang Y. (2020). International comparative study on PISA mathematics achievement test based on cognitive diagnostic models. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2230. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02230

Yasin GM. (2021). Teacher qualifications and academic performance of pupils in public primary schools in Hargeisa District. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(3), 39-44. doi:10.31014/aior.1993.04.03.315

Yildirim I, Seckin-Kapucu M. (2021). The effect of augmented reality applications in science education on academic achievement and retention of 6th grade students. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 7(1), 56-71. doi:10.21891/jeseh.744351

Downloads

Published

2025-12-07

How to Cite

Banot, V. (2025). Assessment Convergence: Teachers’ Praxis and Professional Needs in Mathematics. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 13(2), 184-197. https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol13.2.14.2025

Similar Articles

1-10 of 195

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.