Dimensions of Students’ Academic Engagement as Predictors of Senior Secondary School Mathematics Achievement

Authors

  • Akorede Ayoola Asanre Department of Mathematics, Tai Solarin University of Education, Ijagun, Ijebu-Ode, Ogun-State, Nigeria
  • Adebola Sunday Ifamuyiwa Department of Science and Technology Education, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria
  • Taiwo Oluwadayo Abiodun Department of Mathematics, Tai Solarin University of Education, Ijagun, Ijebu-Ode, Ogun-State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol12.1.4.2024

Keywords:

achievement, heuristic problem-solving, retention, strategies

Abstract

Academic engagement has been a persistent problem and potentially more harmful to the future well-being of the educational system in Nigeria, as students show low turnout in achievement. It is in the light of this, that this study investigated student academic engagement dimensions as predictors of Mathematics achievement in senior secondary school. A descriptive survey research approach was used for the investigation. Sample used in the research comprised 1680 senior secondary school 2 (SS2) offering Mathematics from the twenty one randomly selected schools in the three local government areas of Ogun State's Remo division. The instruments for the collection of data are Mathematics Student Academic Engagement Scale (MSAES) with and Mathematics Achievement Test (MAT) with 0.88. Five hypotheses were developed and put to the test at a significant level. Results indicated that cognitive engagement significantly predicts Mathematics achievement (F = 8.950, p<0.05). The study also revealed that behavioural engagement significantly contribute to the variation in learners' mathematical achievement (F = 17.474, p<0.05), Further more emotional engagement significantly contribute to the variation in learners' mathematical achievement (F = 6.393, p<0.05). Result also revealed that the predictor variables cognitive, behavioural and emotional engagement when taken together significantly contribute to the variance in students’ Mathematics achievement (F = 6.205, p<0.05). This study concluded that Mathematics achievement is well predicted by student's dimension of academic engagement. Hence it is recommended that stakeholders in Nigeria secondary schools should ensure that the students are academically engaged.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L. & Furlong, M. J. 2008. "Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct," Psychology in the Schools 45(5), 369- 386.Archambault, I., Janosz, M. & Chouinard, R., (2012). Teacher beliefs as predictors of adolescents’ cognitive engagement and achievement in mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(5), 319-328. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2011.629694.Bello, T. O. & Ariyo, B. D. (2014). Secondary School Mathematics as Determinant of Academic Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Furlong MJ. (2008). Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.

Archambault I, Janosz M, Chouinard R. (2012). Teacher beliefs as predictors of adolescents’ cognitive engagement and achievement in mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(5), 319-328.

Bello TO, Ariyo BD. (2014). Secondary School Mathematics as Determinant of Academic Performance in University Introductory Physics Journal of Education and Practice, 5(39), 102.

Boaler J. (2009). The Elephant in the Classroom: Helping Children Learn and Love Maths. London: Souvenir Press Ltd.

Dunleavy J, Williams JD, Milton P, Friesen S. (2012). The relationship between student engagement and academic outcomes. What did you do in school today? Research series report number one, Toronto: Canadian Education Association.

Gunuc, S. & Kuzu, A. (2014). Student engagement scale: Development, reliability and validity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 587-610.

Helme S, Clark D. (2001). Identifying cognitive engagement in the mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13(2), 133-153.

Hume K. (2011). Tuned out. Engaging the 21st century learner. Toronto, Ontario: Pearson.

Ifamuyiwa AS. (2006). Effect of Self and Cooperative Instructional Strategies on Senior Secondary School Students Learning Outcome in Mathematics. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ibadan.

Ifamuyiwa AS, Taiwo OA, Akorede AA. (2018). Students’ Representation ability in some secondary school Mathematics themes involving word problems as related to achievement in Mathematics. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 53, 125-135.

Imaobong DA, Mfonobong EU. (2013). Analysis of achievement motivation and academic engagement of students in the Nigerian Classroom. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(3), 385-390.

Kulbir SS. (2006). Teaching of Mathematics. New Delhi, India Sterling Publishers.

Maria RR, Marc AB, Susan E, Mark W, Peter S. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700-712.

Muraina KO, Muraina MB, Amao OZK, Oyelade O. (2013). Parental educational background and socioeconomic status as factors enhancing students’ performance in Itesiwaju local government area of Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Education, 16, 101-113.

National Policy on Education. (2014). Nigeria Educational Policy 6th Edition, NERDC Press.

Oqab A, Huy PP, Bing HN. (2016). Academic Engagement: An overview of its definitions, dimensions and major conceptualisations. International Journal of Education Studies, 9(12), 41-52

Oyedeji OA. (2000). Effective Teaching of Mathematics, Ibadan Sam Bookman Publisher.

Park SY. (2005). Student engagement and classroom variables in improving mathematics achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 87-97.

Rotgans J, Schmidt H. (2011). Cognitive engagement in the problem-based learning classroom. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(4), 465-479.

Salmela‐Aro K, Upadyaya K. (2014). School burnout and engagement in the context of demands–resources model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 137-151.

Vicki T. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University Press.

Wang M, Eccles JS. (2012). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 31- 39.

Wei H, Rui Z, Ru-De L, Ming-Te W, Yi D, Jia W. (2020). The longitudinal linkages among Chinese children’s behavioural, cognitive, and emotional engagement within a mathematics context. Educational Psychology, 40(6), 666-680.

Wiliam D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington IN: Solution Tree Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-05

How to Cite

Asanre, A. A., Ifamuyiwa, A. S., & Abiodun, T. O. (2024). Dimensions of Students’ Academic Engagement as Predictors of Senior Secondary School Mathematics Achievement . Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 12(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol12.1.4.2024