The effectiveness of using scaffolding strategy to develop introduction writing in Tamil essays
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/jvt.vol6.1.9.2025Keywords:
Vygotsky’s, Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), Tamil languageAbstract
The purpose of this study is to determine how effective the application of the scaffolding strategy basically anchored within Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) model or framework is in improving students’ introduction writing skills in Tamil essays of Form 3 students. The foremost task faced by students in reading and writing activities here in is formulating an appropriate introduction which draws in readers and outlines and gives order to the entire essay. Nonetheless, this gap is a common challenge that most students face as it takes them longer to achieve understanding of critical components such as the outlining of a main idea, the inclusion of background information, and the presentation of an argument in a clear thesis statement. The scaffolding strategy involved in the study also provided structured guidance to the students throughout the learning process, which slowly but surely gave them the ability to write on their own. The analysis for this study strongly suggests that scaffolding improved the writing skills and writing confidence of the students and these are important for understanding how to teach Tamil language.
Downloads
References
Alber, R. (2011). Scaffolding in the classroom: The key to helping students reach higher levels of thinking and understanding. Edutopia. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org
Barkley, E. F. (2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. Jossey-Bass.
Billings, E., & Walqui, A. (2024). Zone of proximal development in teaching writing to English language learners. Journal of Language Education, 8(4), 112-124.
Cherry, K. (2023). Zone of proximal development (ZPD): The scaffolding effect on learning. Verywell Mind. Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com
Coffin, C., Curry, M., Hewings, A., Lillis, T., & Swann, J. (2003). Teaching academic writing: A toolkit for higher education. Routledge.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Ablex Publishing.
Ellis, M. (2022). Effective scaffolding and writing instruction: A cross-language comparison. Journal of Writing Pedagogy, 14(1), 42-58.
Foss, K. A. (2020). How to structure a strong introduction for any essay. The Writing Center Journal, 18(2), 59-76.
Hidi, S., & Boscolo, P. (2006). Motivation and writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 155-170). Guilford Press.
Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16(1), 1-20.
Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Cultural differences and writing in a second language. In D. L. G. (Ed.), Language and communication in second language education (pp. 15-28). Cambridge University Press.
McKenzie, W. (1999). Scaffolding for success: How teachers can help students reach their potential. Curriculum and Instruction Journal, 27(3), 204-217.
Vacca, J. S. (2012). Scaffolding writing skills in content areas. Language Arts Journal, 59(4), 56-74.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 165-179.
Zarandi, M. (2014). Scaffolding writing in ESL classes: Improving writing skills using scaffolding techniques. English Language Teaching Journal, 8(4), 123-135.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 S. Kavimalar , K. Muniisvaran

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


