Kesan metodologi TRIZ terhadap kemahiran penyelesaian masalah dalam kalangan pelajar komputeran
Effects of TRIZ Methodology on Problem Solving Skills among Computing Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol9.1.6.2022Keywords:
TRIZ, inovatif, penyelesaian masalah, kemahiran penyelesaian masalah, pelajar pengkomputeranAbstract
Kemahiran penyelesaian masalah adalah suatu kemahiran yang diperlukan di semua peringkat umur bagi membolehkan penyelesaian masalah dalam pelbagai perkara sama ada dalam kehidupan sehari-harian mahupun bidang pembelajaran dan pekerjaan. Dalam konteks keperluan kemahiran penyelesaian masalah yang diperlukan oleh para pelajar kemahiran penyelesaian masalah ini berhubung kait dengan proses kognitif dan meta kognitif seperti penaakulan, pemahaman, pengumpulan maklumat, menganalisis, membuat penyelesaian, membuat keputusan, merancang, meninjau dan menilai. Justeru itu, kajian ini bertujuan mengkaji mengenai kesan penggunaan metodologi TRIZ sebagai metod penyelesaian masalah terhadap kemahiran penyelesaian masalah dalam kalangan pelajar komputeran. Selain itu, kajian ini juga meliputi kesan perbezaan penggunaan metodologi TRIZ terhadap kemahiran penyelesaian masalah dalam kalangan pelajar komputeran yang berbeza tahap peribadi inovatif. Pendekatan eksperimen kuasi dan analisis teks telah diaplikasikan. Seramai 41 orang pelajar komputeran terlibat dalam kajian ini. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam kajian ini adalah soal selidik Computational Thinking Scale, Problem Solving Inventory, Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology dan borang tinjauan persepsi terhadap metodologi penyelesaian masalah TRIZ. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan ujian pra dan ujian pasca bagi analisis soalan soal selidik dan analisis tematik bagi analisis teks. Hasil dapatan kajian, memaparkan bahawa metodologi TRIZ berupaya membantu pelajar untuk menyelesaikan masalah dalam bidang teknologi maklumat dan sains komputer. Kesimpulannya, jelas membuktikan bahawa metodologi TRIZ berpotensi untuk meningkatkan kemahiran penyelesaian masalah dalam kalangan pelajar komputeran.
Abstract
Problem solving skills are essential ability in all stages of age to making able problem solving in numerous circumstances in daily lives neither in education nor profession. In problem solving skills requirement context, students are required to have these skills connected to the process of cognitive and metacognitive such as reasoning, comprehension, information gathering, analysis, solution making, decision making, planning, reviewing, and evaluating. Hence, this study aims to examine the effect of using TRIZ methodology as a problem solving method towards problem solving skills among computing students. Other than that, this study also includes the different effects of TRIZ usage towards problem solving skills with different levels of innovative personalities among computing students. Quasi-experimental approach together with text analysis has been applied. A total of 41 computing students involved in this study. Instruments used in this study consist of a questionnaire Computational Thinking Scale, Problem Solving Inventory, Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology, and a survey form on TRIZ problem solving methodology. Data were analysed using pre-test and post-test analysis for questionnaire and thematic analysis for text analysis. The findings indicate that TRIZ methodology has been proven to help problem solving skills among students in information technology and computer science. In conclusion, it is clearly proven that the TRIZ methodology has the potential to improve problem solving skills among computing students.
Downloads
References
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of Information Technology. Information System Research, 9(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Walker, D. A. (2014). Introduction to Research in Education. (9h Edition). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Ary, D., Lucy Cheser, Jacobs, Christine, K. S. I., & David, W. (2018). Introduction to Research in Education (10th Editi). Cengage Learning.
Cerit, B., Küçükyazıcı, G., & Şener, D. (2014). TRIZ : Theory of inventive problem solving and comparison of TRIZ with the other problem solving techniques. Balkan Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470209943.ch1
Chamoux, J.P. (2019). Conclusion Wealthy Nations, Healthy Global Firms. The Digital Era 2: Political Economy Revisited. ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc. . https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119468967.oth1
Chaudhry, N. G., & Rasool, G. (2012). A case study on improving problem solving skills of undergraduate computer science students. World Applied Sciences Journal, 20(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.20.01.1778
Chongo, S., Osman, K., & Nazrul, A. N. (2020). Level of computational thinking skills among secondary science student: variation across gender and mathematics achievement. Science Education International, 31(2), 159–163.
https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i2.4
Csizmadia, A., Curzon, P., Dorling, M., Humphreys, S., Ng, T., Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2015). Computational thinking - A guide for teachers. Computing At School.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Ekmekci, I., & Nebati, E. E. (2019). Triz Methodology and Applications. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.056
Espacios, H. R., Autores, L. O. S., Nesterenko, A., & Terekhova, V. (2017). Creation of the environment for the development of inventive abilities in subjects of education. 38(40). Revista ESPACIOS.
Ferrari, A., Cachia, R., & Punie, Y. (2009). Innovation and creativity in education and training in the EU member states : Fostering creative learning and supporting innovative teaching. Literature review on Innovation and Creativity in E & T in the EU Member States (ICEAC). European Communities.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step. In IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765
Heppner, P. P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.29.1.66
Ho, M. (2016). Exploring Writing Anxiety and Self-Efficacy among EFL Graduate Students in Taiwan. Higher Education Studies, 6(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v6n1p24
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (6th edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Kreativiti dan inovasi: elemen merentas kurikulum dalam KSSR. https://dokumen.tips/documents/emk-kreativiti-dan-inovasi.html
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah. Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran. https://www.moe.gov.my/menumedia/media-cetak/penerbitan/dskp-kssr/
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Buku Penerangan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah. https://www.academia.edu/32045741/Buku_Penerangan_KSSM
Keong, C. S., Yip, M. W., Shu, N., Swee, L., Toh, G. G., & Tai, S. C. (2017). A review of TRIZ and its bene its & challenges in stimulating creativity in problem solving of pre-university students : A TARUC case study. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(5), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-3.5.2
Kiong, T. T., Saien, S., & Heong, Y. M. (2017). TRIZ : An alternate way to solve problem for student. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2). https://doi.org/ 10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i2/2658
Korkmaz, Ö., Çakir, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005
Korucu, A. T., Gencturk, A. T., & Gundogdu, M. M. (2017). Examination of the Computational Thinking Skills of Students. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age (JOLTIDA), 2(1), 11–19.
Masila, A., Aidah, A. K., & Zanaton, I. (2019). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen kemahiran menyelesaikan masalah untuk murid sekolah menengah berdasarkan model pengukuran Rasch (Validity and reliability of problem-solving skill instrument for secondary school pupils based on Rasch assessment mode. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 44(01SI), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.17576/jpen-2019-44.01si-01
Mcclelland, K., & Grata, L. (2018). A review of the importance of computational thinking in K-12. The Tenth International Conference on Mobile, Hybrid, and On-Line Learning, 32–34. IARIA. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-
Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2019). Competencies for analysis and application. Educational Research (Twelfth Ed). Pearson Education, Inc.
MQA. (2014). Guidelines to good practices: Assessment of students. https://www2.mqa.gov.my/qad/garispanduan/ MR%20CIIQ%20BI.pdf
MQA. (2016). Advisory note no. 7/2016 . Panduan pendidikan fleksibel dalam penawaran program. https://www.mqa.gov.my/pv4/bm/pubs_adv_notes.cfm
MQA. (2017). Malaysian Qualifications Framework (MQF) Second Edition. https://www.mqa.gov.my/pv4/document/mqf/2019/Oct/updated024102019.pdf
Noor Desiro, S., Fariza, K., Rohanilah, M., Yogeswary, K., & Nalini, A. M. (2021). Benefits and challenges of applying computational thinking in education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(5), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.5.1519
Rosen, P. A. (2005). The effect of personal innovativeness on technology acceptance and use [Doctoral dissertation. Oklahoma State University]. https://hdl.handle.net/11244/6811
Seo, Y. H., & Kim, J. H. (2016). Analyzing the effects of coding education through pair programming for the computational thinking and creativity of elementary school students. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(46), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i46/107837
Sharda, R., Delen, D., & Turban, E. (2018). Business intelligence and data analytics. Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108537-4
Sharma, P., Khanna, R. R., & Bhatnagar, V. (2017). Application of TRIZ framework for resolving security issues in IOT. Proceeding - IEEE International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation, ICCCA 2016, 1182–1186. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAA.2016.7813921
Simarmata, M. T. A., & Hia, I. J. (2020). The role of personal innovativeness on behavioral intention of Information Technology. Journal of Economics AndBusiness, 1(2), 18–29.
Spreafico, C., & Russo, D. (2016). TRIZ Industrial Case Studies: A Critical Survey. Procedia CIRP, 39, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.165
United Nations. (2019). Sustainable Development Goal 16: Focus on Public Institutions World Public Sector Report 2019. https://publicadministration.un.org/publications/content/PDFs/World%20Public%20Sector%20Report2019.pdf
Valachich, J., & Schneider, C. (2016). System Information Today Managing In The Digital World (Eighth Edition). Pearson Education Limited.
Yahaya, B., & Noor Sharliana, M. N. (2011). Faktor-faktor yang mendorong kreativiti di kalangan pelajar, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Journal Educational Psychology and Counseling, 2, 175–208. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2020.3.2.210
Yee, M. H., Abu Bakar, N. H., Sharberi, S. N. M., & Tee, T. K. (2020). Analisis keperluan pembangunan modul Teori Penyelesaian Masalah Inventif (TRIZ) secara pencantasan dalam pembelajaran berasaskan masalah (PBM). Proceeding of International Conference on Islamic Education (ICEID). 6(1).
