The Content Domain Analysis of the Revised KSSR Standard 4 Mathematics Textbook Version 2017
Analisis Domain Kandungan Buku Teks Matematik Tahun 4 KSSR Semakan 2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol11.2.5.2021Keywords:
mathematics textbook, content domain, topic fields, TIMSS 2019 mathematics framework, standard fourAbstract
Textbooks are the leading resources for teachers and students in teaching and learning. Thus, this study was conducted to analyse the content of the revised KSSR standard four mathematics textbook version 2017 based on the content domains in the TIMSS 2019 mathematics framework. This study adapted content analysis of survey design using quantitative and qualitative approaches. The study results showed that most of the topics in the standard four mathematics textbook fulfilled the content domains and topic fields stated in TIMSS 2019 mathematics framework. However, some of the content domains and topic fields did not fulfill the minimum percentage as stated in the TIMSS 2019 mathematics framework. The situation was due to some of the content domains, and topic fields exceeding the specific percentage caused others not to reach the fixed percentage level. Consequently, the division of content in the standard four mathematics textbook was less satisfactory. Therefore, this study gave a general view and implications to mathematics textbook writers and curriculum developers to realize the gap between the content in standard four mathematics textbook and TIMSS 2019 mathematics framework, which must be given more attention to overcome the deficiency of standard four mathematics textbook. This study improved space towards creating a standard four mathematics textbook that parallels TIMSS 2019 mathematics framework so that teachers’ teaching and students’ learning can achieve at the optimum level. Indirectly, the stakeholders have an early preparation to face the TIMSS test which will be held in 2023.
Downloads
References
Adu, K. O., Mathwasa, J., & Adu, E. (2020). Textbook utilisation in teaching mathematics in selected primary schools in East London education district. e-Bangi, 17(2), 156–170.
Annis, P., & Wahidin. (2020). Are the mathematics textbooks for eighth-grade meet the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2019 mathematics framework? Edumatika : Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 129–135.
Asri, L., Oktalidiasari, D., & Darmawijoyo. (2020). Students’ perception of reading and understanding mathematics textbook. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1480(1).
Asyrani, A. S., & Roslinda, R. (2020). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of primary school mathematics textbook. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(1), 286-300.
Behnke, Y. (2018). Textbook effects and efficacy. The Palgrave Handbook of Textbook Studies, 383-398.
Cheng, C. C., & Silalahi, S. M. (2017). A review and content analysis of mathematics textbooks in educational research. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 75(3), 235–251.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. Edisi ke-8. London: Routledge.
Engbrecht, J. R. (2018). Digital textbooks versus print textbooks. Culminating Projects in Teacher Development, 35.
Even, R. (2020). Mathematics teachers edits textbooks: Opportunities and challenges. In Ben-David Kolikant, Y., Martinovic, D., & Milner-Bolotin, M. (Eds.), STEM Teachers and Teaching in the Digital Era (pp. 37-52). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Fan, L., Trouche, L., Qi, C., Rezat, S., & Visnovska, J. (2018). Research on Mathematics Textbooks and Teachers’ Resources. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Glasnovic, G. D. (2018). Requirements in mathematics textbooks: A five-dimensional analysis of textbook exercises and examples. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(7), 1003–1024.
Gobi, K., Rozaili, M. A., & Mutharasan S. S. @ Sellaiah. (2019). Buku Teks Matematik Tahun 4 Sekolah Kebangsaan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Ikhsan, O., & Wan Azimah, W. K. (2017). Teachers’ view on KSSR mathematics document standard of curriculum. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 7(2), 19-30.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2018). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun 4. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, KPM.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2020). Laporan Kebangsaan TIMSS 2019. Putrajaya: Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan, KPM.
Kristanto, Y. D., & Santoso, E. B. (2020). Towards a mathematics textbook for supporting 21st century learning: The student perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1).
Lessani, A., Yunus, A. S., Tarmiz, R. A., & Mahmud, R. (2014). Investigating the content of mathematics textbook used in 8 th grade in Malaysia based on content domain of TIMSS . International Journal of Education and Research, 2(9), 71–84.
Lindquist, M., Philpot, R., Mullis, I. V. S., & Cotter, K. E. (2017). TIMSS 2019 mathematics framework. In Mullis, I.V.S., & Martin, M.O. (Eds.), TIMSS 2019 Assessment Frameworks (pp. 11–25). Boston College: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Mullis, I. V. S. (2017). Introduction. In Mullis, I.V.S., & Martin, M.O. (Eds.), TIMSS 2019 Assessment Frameworks (pp. 11–25). Boston College: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Nik Azis, N. P. (2016). Penghasilan Disertasi Berkualiti dalam Pendidikan Matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Norazlin, M. R., & Siti Rahaimah, A. (2019). Amalan dan cabaran pelaksanaan pembelajaran abad ke-21. Proceedings of Islamic Civilization and Technology Management, 87–105.
Norfadillah Zalina, M. Z., & Najihah, A. W. (2017). Cabaran dalam pengajaran matematik kurikulum standard sekolah menengah (KSSM). Proceeding of International of Empowering Islamic Civilization, 141-145.
Noriati, A. R., Boon, P. Y., & Sharifah, F. S. A. (2017). Murid dan Pembelajaran. Selangor: Oxford Fajar.
Parmjit Singh, Yusoff, N. M., & Hoon, T. S. (2020). Content analysis of primary school mathematics textbooks and its relationship with pupils achievement. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 15–25.
Raja Harun, R. N. S., Fook Lee, J. L., Omar, A., Hanif, M. H., & M. Pillay Arumugam, L. (2018). Developing and validating a curriculum framework for preparing quality teachers for the future. INTED2018 Proceedings, 7845–7853.
Rowlett, P., Smith, E., Corner, A. S., O’Sullivan, D., & Waldock, J. (2019). The potential of recreational mathematics to support the development of mathematical learning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(7), 972–986.
Schubring, G., & Fan, L. (2018). Recent advances in mathematics textbook research and development: An overview. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 50(5), 765–771.
Stará, J., Chvál, M., & Starý, K. (2017). The role of textbooks in primary education. e-Pedagogium, 17(4), 60–69.
van den Ham, A. K., & Heinze, A. (2018). Does the textbook matter? Longitudinal effects of textbook choice on primary school students’ achievement in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 133-140.
Woolfolk, A. (2016). Educational Psychology. Edisi ke-13. Amerika Syarikat: Pearson Education.
Yadav, S. (2019). Role of mathematics in the development of society. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR), 6(4), 295-298.
