Modul Hayati, Eksplorasi, Berfikir Aras Tinggi (HEBAT) Bacaan: Strategik pengajaran dan pembelajaran membaca

Strategic teaching and learning of reading through the Appreciation, Exploration and HOTs Module (HEBAT)

Authors

  • Rusdi Mat Nor Universiti Malaya
  • Normarini Norzan Universiti Malaya
  • Abdul Jalil Othman Universiti Malaya
  • Mohd Rashid Mohd Saad Universiti Malaya
  • Riyan Hidayat Universiti Malaya
  • Ahmad Rozi Abu Universiti Malaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol8.no2.7.2018

Keywords:

Modul HEBAT Bacaan, Membaca, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Membaca, Pedagogi Abad ke 21, Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi, HEBAT Reading Module, Reading, Teaching and Learning of Reading, 21st Century Pedagogy, Higher Order Thinking Skills

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan tentang Modul HEBAT Bacaan sebagai satu strategik pengajaran dan pembelajaran membaca dalam usaha meningkatkan literasi bacaan murid sekolah menengah daripada murid Tingkatan Satu hingga murid Tingkatan Empat. Modul HEBAT bacaan adalah wardah yang disediakan oleh KPM bagi menyediakan murid untuk menjawab Literasi Bacaan PISA. Pembinaan Modul HEBAT Modul ini telah dibangunkan menggunakan pendekatan bertema dan memberi penekanan tentang teknik serta proses membaca sebagai panduan pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru di dalam kelas. Oleh itu dalam penulisan ini dibincangkan tentang pemikiran modul HEBAT bacaan, kebolehlaksanaan Modul HEBAT Bacaan dan Pedagogi Abad ke-21 (PAK 21) serta Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT). Secara keseluruhannya modul ini mempunyai nilai tambah dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran (P&P) membaca Bahasa Melayu  kerana pendekatan yang digunakan adalah menyeluruh mencakupi aspek strategik P&P, cadangan aktiviti, bahan rangsangan/ simulasi dan projek penilaian pembelajaran. Selain itu penekanan PAK 21 dan KBAT juga menjadikan modul ini lebih sesuai dengan situasi P&P masa kini.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This article aims to clarify the HEBAT module (Appreciation, Exploration and HOTs) for reading. The Module is an approach to teaching and learning to read in the attempt to improve reading literacy among Secondary One to Secondary Four school students. The HEBAT module has beenbestablished by the Ministry of Education in preparing students for the PISA Reading Literacy. This module has been developed based on a thematic approach and emphasizes on the techniques and processes of reading as a guide for classroom teaching and learning. Therefore, this paper discusses the literature related to the HEBAT module, the feasibility of the HEBAT module and the 21st century pedagogies as well as Higher Order Thinking Skills (HoTS). Overall, this module has an added value towards teaching and learning of reading of the Malay language. It integrates approaches, covers the strategic aspects of teaching and learning, suggests activities, and provides stimulation and simulating materials as well as learning evaluation projects. Since the module emphasis on 21st century learning and HoTS, this module is an apt choice for the current teaching and learning situation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Jalil Othman, Normarini Norzan, Ghazali Darussalam dan Saedah Siraj. (2011). Cabaran Guru Program LINUS dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Bahasa. Jurnal Masalah Pendidikan Bil. 34. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya. 37-51.

Abdul Jalil Othman, Normarini Norzan, Rahmad Sukur Abd Samad, Ghazali Darusalam,

Shanina Sharatol. (2012). Application of constructivism learning in guided essay writing. Journal Issues in Education, Vol. 35. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya. 136-146.

Abdul Jalil Othman, Normarini Norzan, Megat Ahmad Kamaluddin Megat Daud, Chin Hai Leng, dan Ghazali Darusalam. (2013). Daya saing Bahasa Melayu dalam transformasi kurikulum di Malaysia. Jurnal Isu dalam Pendidikan, Jld. 37. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya. 287-305.

Biancarosa, C., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Reading next – A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

Boardman, A. G., Vaughn, S. R., Buckley, P. Reutebuch, C., Roberts, G., & Klingner, J.K. (2016). Collaborative strategic reading for students with learning disabilities in upper elementary classrooms. Exceptional Children, 82, 409-427.

Brooks, J.G., and Books, M.G. (1999). The courage to be contructivist. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 23-25.

Carrell, O. (1992). Awareness of text structure: Effect on recall. Language Learning, 42, 1-20.

Cartwright, K. B., Marshall, T. R., Dandy, K. L., & Isaac, M. C. (2010). The development of graphophonological semantic cognitive flexibility and its contribution to reading comprehension in beginning readers. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11 (1), 61-85.

Chang Lee Hoon, Mohd Faris Dziauddin, Baharuddin Jabar, Mohd Noor Daud, Nurul Firdauz Abd rahman dan Zainuddin Othman. (2014). Social science literacy among form four student in Malaysian secondary schools. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, Vol. 4, No. 2, December 2014, 59-72.

Goldman, S. R., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). Managing, understanding, applying, and creating knowledge in the information age: Next-generation challenges and opportunities. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 255–269.

Grohe, M., & Segoyfin, L. (2000). On First order Topologies Queries. 15th Annual IEEE symposium on logic in computer Science (LICS ‘00): 349-361.

Halim Arifin. (2013). Kemahiran berfikir dalam pengajaran pemahaman bacaan. (Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan).Universiti Malaya. Kuala Lumpur.

Hirschman, Lynette, Marc Light, Eric Breck, John D. Burger. (1999). Deep Read: A Reading Comprehension System. In proceedings of the 37th Annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (COLING-96). Copenhagen Denmark the internasional committee on computational linguistics.

Irwin J.W. (1991). Teaching reading comprehension process. (2nd ed.). Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Ishak Haron. (2005). Pengalaman mengajar di Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Pyt: Mohd. Syariefudin Abdullah et.al. Tanjung Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Hlm. 59-68.

Kidd, V.S. and Greene, B.E. (2002). Comprehension istruction: Beyond strategies. Reading Teachers, 55(7), 672-676.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Panduan penggunaan bahan sumber HEBAT bacaan Bahasa Melayu. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Laporan Tahunan 2016 Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013 - 2025. Unit Pelaksanaan dan Prestasi Pendidikan: Putrajaya.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). PISA 2015. Programme for International Student Assessment. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan: Putrajaya.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (1999). Surat Perkeliling Ikhtisas Bil. 3/1999: KP(BS) 8591/ Jilid XV/ (3).

Lehnert & Wendy, G. (1978). The Process of question answering: computer simulation of cognition. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates.

Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.

Leslie, L. & Caldwell, J. (2006). Qualitative reading inventory-4. Boston: Pearson Education.

Lewis, J. (1991). Redefining criticalreading for college critical thinking course. Journal of Reading 34(6):420423.

Marohaini Yusoff. (1989). Strategi pengajaran bacaan dan kefahaman. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Ness, M. K. (2009). Reading comprehension strategy instruction in secondary content area classrooms: Teachers’ use of and attitudes toward reading comprehension instruction. Reading Horizons, 49, 143166.

Ness, M. K. (2016). Reading comprehension strategies in secondary content area classrooms.

Raymond. E. (2000). Cognitive Characteristics. Learners with Mild Disabilities Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, New York: A Pearson Education Company.

Safiah Osman. (1990). Kanak-kanak dan pembacaan dlm. Membaca: Satu Pengenalan. (Safiah Osman, Ed.): 20-45. Kuala Lumpur: Berita Publishing.

Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 40–59.

Silva, M., & Cain, K. (2015). The relations between lower and higher-level comprehension skills and their role in prediction of early reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 321-331.

Zulkifley Hamid. (2007). Aplikasi psikolinguistik dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran bahasa. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publishing sdn. Bhd.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-01

How to Cite

Mat Nor, R., Norzan, N., Othman, A. J., Mohd Saad, M. R., Hidayat, R., & Abu, A. R. (2018). Modul Hayati, Eksplorasi, Berfikir Aras Tinggi (HEBAT) Bacaan: Strategik pengajaran dan pembelajaran membaca: Strategic teaching and learning of reading through the Appreciation, Exploration and HOTs Module (HEBAT). Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education, 8(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol8.no2.7.2018